[德国高血压患者血压自我测量。][1993年春/初夏问卷调查结果]。

H J Krecke, P Lütkes, M Maiwald, A Schultze-Rupp
{"title":"[德国高血压患者血压自我测量。][1993年春/初夏问卷调查结果]。","authors":"H J Krecke,&nbsp;P Lütkes,&nbsp;M Maiwald,&nbsp;A Schultze-Rupp","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 'cardiovascular hotline' in Heidelberg, established in April 1992, provides data concerning the self-measurement of blood pressure. For this purpose 277 hypertensives were asked from 15 April to 15 July 1993. 195 (70%) of those questioned (47% men, 53% women) practised home-recording, but only 17% on recommendation of their physician. Only 22% were introduced to the technique by experienced personnel; just 50% were adequately controlled. At least 35% of hypertensives used an oscillometric device and not more than 10% an auscultation device. 5 to 14% of the patients reported to have difficulties in handling their device. Approximately 60% of the patients practicing home-recording stated that this method enabled them to cope better with their disease. Compared with the 1987 pilot study in the Hamburg area, this percentage did not increase; however, it could be confirmed that only approximately 10% of the patients are unsuited for home-recording. 75% of the hypertensives measuring their own blood pressure documented their values, but in only 47% of all cases physicians drew conclusions from the data. 31% of the patients were unable to say whether their medication was adjusted on the basis of self-measured blood pressure values. In conclusion, many hypertensives practice self-measurement of blood pressure. Despite this fact, home-readings are not yet sufficiently accepted by physicians as a possible and desirable method to optimize high blood pressure treatment. This situation should be improved since compliance of physicians is the basis for a better education of hypertensive patients, thus optimizing patient compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21438,"journal":{"name":"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis","volume":"83 33","pages":"895-900"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Self-measurement of blood pressure in hypertensive subjects in Germany. Results of a questionnaire in Spring/early Summer 1993].\",\"authors\":\"H J Krecke,&nbsp;P Lütkes,&nbsp;M Maiwald,&nbsp;A Schultze-Rupp\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 'cardiovascular hotline' in Heidelberg, established in April 1992, provides data concerning the self-measurement of blood pressure. For this purpose 277 hypertensives were asked from 15 April to 15 July 1993. 195 (70%) of those questioned (47% men, 53% women) practised home-recording, but only 17% on recommendation of their physician. Only 22% were introduced to the technique by experienced personnel; just 50% were adequately controlled. At least 35% of hypertensives used an oscillometric device and not more than 10% an auscultation device. 5 to 14% of the patients reported to have difficulties in handling their device. Approximately 60% of the patients practicing home-recording stated that this method enabled them to cope better with their disease. Compared with the 1987 pilot study in the Hamburg area, this percentage did not increase; however, it could be confirmed that only approximately 10% of the patients are unsuited for home-recording. 75% of the hypertensives measuring their own blood pressure documented their values, but in only 47% of all cases physicians drew conclusions from the data. 31% of the patients were unable to say whether their medication was adjusted on the basis of self-measured blood pressure values. In conclusion, many hypertensives practice self-measurement of blood pressure. Despite this fact, home-readings are not yet sufficiently accepted by physicians as a possible and desirable method to optimize high blood pressure treatment. This situation should be improved since compliance of physicians is the basis for a better education of hypertensive patients, thus optimizing patient compliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis\",\"volume\":\"83 33\",\"pages\":\"895-900\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1992年4月在海德堡设立的“心血管热线”提供有关自我测量血压的数据。为此目的,从1993年4月15日至7月15日询问了277名高血压患者。195人(70%)的受访者(47%的男性,53%的女性)实行家庭录音,但只有17%的人听从医生的建议。只有22%的人是由经验丰富的人员介绍的;只有50%得到了充分的控制。至少35%的高血压患者使用示波仪,不超过10%的患者使用听诊仪。5%到14%的患者报告在操作设备时有困难。大约60%实行家庭记录的患者表示,这种方法使他们能够更好地应对疾病。与1987年汉堡地区的试点研究相比,这一比例没有增加;然而,可以确定的是,只有大约10%的患者不适合家庭记录。75%的高血压患者测量了自己的血压,但在所有病例中,只有47%的医生从数据中得出结论。31%的患者无法说出他们的药物是否根据自己测量的血压值进行了调整。总之,许多高血压患者自我测量血压。尽管如此,医生们还没有充分接受家庭读数作为一种可能的和理想的方法来优化高血压治疗。这种情况应该得到改善,因为医生的依从性是更好地教育高血压患者的基础,从而优化患者的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Self-measurement of blood pressure in hypertensive subjects in Germany. Results of a questionnaire in Spring/early Summer 1993].

The 'cardiovascular hotline' in Heidelberg, established in April 1992, provides data concerning the self-measurement of blood pressure. For this purpose 277 hypertensives were asked from 15 April to 15 July 1993. 195 (70%) of those questioned (47% men, 53% women) practised home-recording, but only 17% on recommendation of their physician. Only 22% were introduced to the technique by experienced personnel; just 50% were adequately controlled. At least 35% of hypertensives used an oscillometric device and not more than 10% an auscultation device. 5 to 14% of the patients reported to have difficulties in handling their device. Approximately 60% of the patients practicing home-recording stated that this method enabled them to cope better with their disease. Compared with the 1987 pilot study in the Hamburg area, this percentage did not increase; however, it could be confirmed that only approximately 10% of the patients are unsuited for home-recording. 75% of the hypertensives measuring their own blood pressure documented their values, but in only 47% of all cases physicians drew conclusions from the data. 31% of the patients were unable to say whether their medication was adjusted on the basis of self-measured blood pressure values. In conclusion, many hypertensives practice self-measurement of blood pressure. Despite this fact, home-readings are not yet sufficiently accepted by physicians as a possible and desirable method to optimize high blood pressure treatment. This situation should be improved since compliance of physicians is the basis for a better education of hypertensive patients, thus optimizing patient compliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Interventional cardiology]. [Pallor]. [Leukopenia]. [In Process Citation] [What is your diagnosis? Henoch-Schoenlein rheumatoid purpura].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1