[寿命延长的选择是否可能通过衰老的规律性来实现?]

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie Pub Date : 1994-05-01
H Niedermüller, G Hofecker
{"title":"[寿命延长的选择是否可能通过衰老的规律性来实现?]","authors":"H Niedermüller,&nbsp;G Hofecker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To answer this question it is important to explain the mode of development of the different maximum life span potentials (MLP) during evolution. We know by empiric-historical investigations, that at least later in evolution appearing species of mammals possess a higher MLP. What does then mean a \"regular process\"? The aging process is a regular one, being a physiologic event, in the character of that what all we can determine at it, as far as it allows explanation and prediction. This did succeed in a high degree during the until now short tradition of experimental gerontology. We refer to experimental results not only from the literature but also from our own work on repair, genetic and metabolic changes and multivariate investigations into the biological age, to decide from two hypotheses of the causes of aging, how the title question can be answered: a) aging as a programmed event, brought about by aging genes, controlled by an intrinsic clock. These genes should restrict life expectancy or the replicative capacity of cells--hence the adaptive hypothesis; b) aging as a consequence of the accumulation of errors counteracted by antibiosenescent strategies (AS)--hence nonadaptive hypotheses, the most plausible one being that of the disposable soma. Later species are adapted better to changing environmental conditions by their other development, their ecological niches are larger, their environment contains specifically lesser dangers and risks, because they better cope with them--therefore it is worth while to spend more energy for the maintenance of their soma than for their reproduction: they develop better and more AS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76845,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie","volume":"27 3","pages":"166-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Is selection for extended life expectancy possible by regularity in aging?].\",\"authors\":\"H Niedermüller,&nbsp;G Hofecker\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To answer this question it is important to explain the mode of development of the different maximum life span potentials (MLP) during evolution. We know by empiric-historical investigations, that at least later in evolution appearing species of mammals possess a higher MLP. What does then mean a \\\"regular process\\\"? The aging process is a regular one, being a physiologic event, in the character of that what all we can determine at it, as far as it allows explanation and prediction. This did succeed in a high degree during the until now short tradition of experimental gerontology. We refer to experimental results not only from the literature but also from our own work on repair, genetic and metabolic changes and multivariate investigations into the biological age, to decide from two hypotheses of the causes of aging, how the title question can be answered: a) aging as a programmed event, brought about by aging genes, controlled by an intrinsic clock. These genes should restrict life expectancy or the replicative capacity of cells--hence the adaptive hypothesis; b) aging as a consequence of the accumulation of errors counteracted by antibiosenescent strategies (AS)--hence nonadaptive hypotheses, the most plausible one being that of the disposable soma. Later species are adapted better to changing environmental conditions by their other development, their ecological niches are larger, their environment contains specifically lesser dangers and risks, because they better cope with them--therefore it is worth while to spend more energy for the maintenance of their soma than for their reproduction: they develop better and more AS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"166-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了回答这个问题,解释进化过程中不同最大寿命潜能(MLP)的发展模式是很重要的。根据经验历史调查,我们知道,至少在后来的进化中,出现的哺乳动物物种拥有更高的MLP。那么“常规过程”是什么意思呢?衰老过程是有规律的,是一种生理事件,就其特征而言,我们所能确定的是,只要它允许解释和预测。在实验老年学的短暂传统中,这在很大程度上取得了成功。我们不仅参考了文献中的实验结果,还参考了我们自己在修复、遗传和代谢变化以及对生物年龄的多变量调查方面的工作,以确定衰老原因的两种假设,如何回答标题问题:a)衰老是一个程序化的事件,由衰老基因带来,由内在时钟控制。这些基因应该会限制细胞的预期寿命或复制能力——因此有了适应性假说;b)衰老是由抗生素衰老策略(as)抵消的错误积累的结果——因此是非适应性假设,最合理的假设是一次性躯体。后来的物种通过其他发展更好地适应了不断变化的环境条件,它们的生态位更大,它们的环境包含的危险和风险更小,因为它们能更好地应对它们——因此,花更多的精力来维持它们的躯体比花更多的精力来繁殖是值得的:它们发育得更好,更AS。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Is selection for extended life expectancy possible by regularity in aging?].

To answer this question it is important to explain the mode of development of the different maximum life span potentials (MLP) during evolution. We know by empiric-historical investigations, that at least later in evolution appearing species of mammals possess a higher MLP. What does then mean a "regular process"? The aging process is a regular one, being a physiologic event, in the character of that what all we can determine at it, as far as it allows explanation and prediction. This did succeed in a high degree during the until now short tradition of experimental gerontology. We refer to experimental results not only from the literature but also from our own work on repair, genetic and metabolic changes and multivariate investigations into the biological age, to decide from two hypotheses of the causes of aging, how the title question can be answered: a) aging as a programmed event, brought about by aging genes, controlled by an intrinsic clock. These genes should restrict life expectancy or the replicative capacity of cells--hence the adaptive hypothesis; b) aging as a consequence of the accumulation of errors counteracted by antibiosenescent strategies (AS)--hence nonadaptive hypotheses, the most plausible one being that of the disposable soma. Later species are adapted better to changing environmental conditions by their other development, their ecological niches are larger, their environment contains specifically lesser dangers and risks, because they better cope with them--therefore it is worth while to spend more energy for the maintenance of their soma than for their reproduction: they develop better and more AS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Determinants of nursing home admission of elderly patients and chances for prevention. A longitudinal study in Germany]. [Extended family, immediate family and caregiver contacts of 100-year-old patients in Hungary]. [Demography of aging in Spain]. [Assisted living: possibilities, limits and architectural requirements--considerations from the viewpoint of an architect with ecopsychological orientation]. [Suitable housing--experiences of counseling facilities in Austria and Germany].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1