{"title":"上颌骨vs下颌骨:为什么使用HA?","authors":"R M Meffert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various studies have shown that noncoated, metallic screw-type implants have been highly successful in types 1, 2, and 3 bone. However, in type 4 bone, such as that found in the maxilla, these implants have not been as successful. In the maxilla, HA-coated implants have shown better results than noncoated implants, particularly with regard to bone-to-implant contact, shear strength, and fixation. The author therefore concludes that the HA-coated implant may have better long-term success when shorter implants are needed, and when treating patients with poor, low density, and cancellous bone.</p>","PeriodicalId":77696,"journal":{"name":"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement","volume":" 15","pages":"S533-8; quiz S565-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maxilla vs mandible: why use HA?\",\"authors\":\"R M Meffert\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Various studies have shown that noncoated, metallic screw-type implants have been highly successful in types 1, 2, and 3 bone. However, in type 4 bone, such as that found in the maxilla, these implants have not been as successful. In the maxilla, HA-coated implants have shown better results than noncoated implants, particularly with regard to bone-to-implant contact, shear strength, and fixation. The author therefore concludes that the HA-coated implant may have better long-term success when shorter implants are needed, and when treating patients with poor, low density, and cancellous bone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement\",\"volume\":\" 15\",\"pages\":\"S533-8; quiz S565-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Various studies have shown that noncoated, metallic screw-type implants have been highly successful in types 1, 2, and 3 bone. However, in type 4 bone, such as that found in the maxilla, these implants have not been as successful. In the maxilla, HA-coated implants have shown better results than noncoated implants, particularly with regard to bone-to-implant contact, shear strength, and fixation. The author therefore concludes that the HA-coated implant may have better long-term success when shorter implants are needed, and when treating patients with poor, low density, and cancellous bone.