Adam Darcy , Alema Galijatovic , Ronald Barth , Timothy Kenny , Kristin D. Krantzman , Tracy A. Schoolcraft
{"title":"硅氟蚀刻的分子动力学模拟","authors":"Adam Darcy , Alema Galijatovic , Ronald Barth , Timothy Kenny , Kristin D. Krantzman , Tracy A. Schoolcraft","doi":"10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00080-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Molecular dynamics simulations of the reactions between gaseous fluorine atoms and (SiF<sub><em>x</em></sub>)<sub><em>n</em></sub> adsorbates on the Si{100} — (2 × 1) surface are performed using the SW potential and compared to simulations with the WWC reparameterization of the SW potential. Theoretical and experimental work has demonstrated that the reactive fluorosilyl layer during siliconfluorine etching is composed of tower-like adspecies of SiF, SiF<sub>2</sub>, and SiF<sub>3</sub> groups. The objective of the simulations is to determine how the chemical composition, mechanism of formation, and energy distribution of the etched gas-phase products depend on the identity of the reacting adsorbate, the incident kinetic energy, and the parameterization of the potential energy function. Three reactions are simulated: F(g) + SiF<sub>3</sub>(a), F(g) + SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>3</sub>(a), and F(g) + SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>3</sub>(a). SiF<sub>4</sub> is the major product and Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub> and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> are minor products. In Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub> and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>, the silicon-fluorine bond that is formed is stronger than the silicon-silicon bond in the molecule and, therefore, the majority of these products have enough energy to dissociate and will fragment before reaching the detector. An S<sub>N</sub>2-like mechanism is the primary mechanism responsible for the formation of SiF<sub>4</sub>, Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub>, and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>. In addition, at higher energies, the simulations have discovered a previously unknown mechanism for the formation of SiF<sub>4</sub>, which involves an insertion between a silicon-silicon bond. The results of the simulations with the two potentials differ quite substantially in their prediction of the reactivity of the adsorbates. The SW potential predicts a 2- to 3-eV lower energy threshold for reaction and a much higher reaction cross-section, especially for the SiF<sub>4</sub> product. These results are explained in terms of the differences in the potential energy functions used to describe the silicon-fluorine interactions. In addition, the results are compared to experimental data on silicon-fluorine etching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular graphics","volume":"14 5","pages":"Pages 260-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00080-X","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular dynamics simulations of silicon-fluorine etching\",\"authors\":\"Adam Darcy , Alema Galijatovic , Ronald Barth , Timothy Kenny , Kristin D. Krantzman , Tracy A. Schoolcraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00080-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Molecular dynamics simulations of the reactions between gaseous fluorine atoms and (SiF<sub><em>x</em></sub>)<sub><em>n</em></sub> adsorbates on the Si{100} — (2 × 1) surface are performed using the SW potential and compared to simulations with the WWC reparameterization of the SW potential. Theoretical and experimental work has demonstrated that the reactive fluorosilyl layer during siliconfluorine etching is composed of tower-like adspecies of SiF, SiF<sub>2</sub>, and SiF<sub>3</sub> groups. The objective of the simulations is to determine how the chemical composition, mechanism of formation, and energy distribution of the etched gas-phase products depend on the identity of the reacting adsorbate, the incident kinetic energy, and the parameterization of the potential energy function. Three reactions are simulated: F(g) + SiF<sub>3</sub>(a), F(g) + SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>3</sub>(a), and F(g) + SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>2</sub>SiF<sub>3</sub>(a). SiF<sub>4</sub> is the major product and Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub> and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub> are minor products. In Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub> and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>, the silicon-fluorine bond that is formed is stronger than the silicon-silicon bond in the molecule and, therefore, the majority of these products have enough energy to dissociate and will fragment before reaching the detector. An S<sub>N</sub>2-like mechanism is the primary mechanism responsible for the formation of SiF<sub>4</sub>, Si<sub>2</sub>F<sub>6</sub>, and Si<sub>3</sub>F<sub>8</sub>. In addition, at higher energies, the simulations have discovered a previously unknown mechanism for the formation of SiF<sub>4</sub>, which involves an insertion between a silicon-silicon bond. The results of the simulations with the two potentials differ quite substantially in their prediction of the reactivity of the adsorbates. The SW potential predicts a 2- to 3-eV lower energy threshold for reaction and a much higher reaction cross-section, especially for the SiF<sub>4</sub> product. These results are explained in terms of the differences in the potential energy functions used to describe the silicon-fluorine interactions. In addition, the results are compared to experimental data on silicon-fluorine etching.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of molecular graphics\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 260-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00080-X\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of molecular graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026378559600080X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026378559600080X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Molecular dynamics simulations of silicon-fluorine etching
Molecular dynamics simulations of the reactions between gaseous fluorine atoms and (SiFx)n adsorbates on the Si{100} — (2 × 1) surface are performed using the SW potential and compared to simulations with the WWC reparameterization of the SW potential. Theoretical and experimental work has demonstrated that the reactive fluorosilyl layer during siliconfluorine etching is composed of tower-like adspecies of SiF, SiF2, and SiF3 groups. The objective of the simulations is to determine how the chemical composition, mechanism of formation, and energy distribution of the etched gas-phase products depend on the identity of the reacting adsorbate, the incident kinetic energy, and the parameterization of the potential energy function. Three reactions are simulated: F(g) + SiF3(a), F(g) + SiF2SiF3(a), and F(g) + SiF2SiF2SiF3(a). SiF4 is the major product and Si2F6 and Si3F8 are minor products. In Si2F6 and Si3F8, the silicon-fluorine bond that is formed is stronger than the silicon-silicon bond in the molecule and, therefore, the majority of these products have enough energy to dissociate and will fragment before reaching the detector. An SN2-like mechanism is the primary mechanism responsible for the formation of SiF4, Si2F6, and Si3F8. In addition, at higher energies, the simulations have discovered a previously unknown mechanism for the formation of SiF4, which involves an insertion between a silicon-silicon bond. The results of the simulations with the two potentials differ quite substantially in their prediction of the reactivity of the adsorbates. The SW potential predicts a 2- to 3-eV lower energy threshold for reaction and a much higher reaction cross-section, especially for the SiF4 product. These results are explained in terms of the differences in the potential energy functions used to describe the silicon-fluorine interactions. In addition, the results are compared to experimental data on silicon-fluorine etching.