N P Koper, C M Thomas, L F Massuger, M F Segers, L A Kiemeney, A L Verbeek
{"title":"四种“第二代”免疫分析系统测定血清中CA 125的比较,采用图形方法进行方法比较分析。","authors":"N P Koper, C M Thomas, L F Massuger, M F Segers, L A Kiemeney, A L Verbeek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical management of ovarian cancer patients is facilitated by CA 125 determinations in serum. Presently, several assay systems based on different concepts and different methodologies are available to measure CA 125. Method comparison analysis of such assay systems is usually performed through (linear) regression analysis, which requires assumptions about the distribution of experimental data and its measurement error. The aim of the present study was to compare four newly developed second generation assay systems for quantitation of CA 125 by utilizing an alternative simple approach to method comparison analysis. This alternative comprises the construction of relative difference plots and mountain plots, previously described by Krouwer et al. (Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995; 33:525-7). In addition, the diagnostic value of the assays was illustrated through receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves. Sera obtained from 300 women were assayed for CA 125 using the Abbott IMx CA 125 assay (Abbott), the Centocor CA 125 II RIA assay (Centocor), the Berilux Ov testing kit for CA 125 (Behringwerke), and the CA 125 TR-FIA assay (Wallac Oy). Both the relative difference plots and the mountain plots revealed higher serum concentrations with the Centocor RIA II (Median +33%, P2.5 to P97.5: -25% to 161%) and Berilux (Median +28%, P2.5 to P97.5: -17% to 108%) compared to the Abbott IMx system. The TR-FIA assay system showed lower serum concentrations (Median - 17%, P2.5 to P97.5: -74% to 229%). The combination of relative difference plots and mountain plots demonstrated clearly the wide range of differences between CA 125 assays measuring the same analyte. The relative difference plots provided insight into the distribution of the differences over the range of measurement as well as the identification of outliers. A simple quantitative assessment of the median differences could be made from the overlaying mountain plots. The close correspondence observed between the ROC curves illustrated that assay systems for CA 125 differing in design (type of antibodies used) and format can produce similar results on group level. However, the results of the clinical evaluation underline the importance of the application of assay specific cut-off values.</p>","PeriodicalId":77119,"journal":{"name":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","volume":"35 8","pages":"617-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of four 'second generation' immunoassay systems to determine CA 125 in serum by using a graphical approach to method comparison analysis.\",\"authors\":\"N P Koper, C M Thomas, L F Massuger, M F Segers, L A Kiemeney, A L Verbeek\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical management of ovarian cancer patients is facilitated by CA 125 determinations in serum. Presently, several assay systems based on different concepts and different methodologies are available to measure CA 125. Method comparison analysis of such assay systems is usually performed through (linear) regression analysis, which requires assumptions about the distribution of experimental data and its measurement error. The aim of the present study was to compare four newly developed second generation assay systems for quantitation of CA 125 by utilizing an alternative simple approach to method comparison analysis. This alternative comprises the construction of relative difference plots and mountain plots, previously described by Krouwer et al. (Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995; 33:525-7). In addition, the diagnostic value of the assays was illustrated through receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves. Sera obtained from 300 women were assayed for CA 125 using the Abbott IMx CA 125 assay (Abbott), the Centocor CA 125 II RIA assay (Centocor), the Berilux Ov testing kit for CA 125 (Behringwerke), and the CA 125 TR-FIA assay (Wallac Oy). Both the relative difference plots and the mountain plots revealed higher serum concentrations with the Centocor RIA II (Median +33%, P2.5 to P97.5: -25% to 161%) and Berilux (Median +28%, P2.5 to P97.5: -17% to 108%) compared to the Abbott IMx system. The TR-FIA assay system showed lower serum concentrations (Median - 17%, P2.5 to P97.5: -74% to 229%). The combination of relative difference plots and mountain plots demonstrated clearly the wide range of differences between CA 125 assays measuring the same analyte. The relative difference plots provided insight into the distribution of the differences over the range of measurement as well as the identification of outliers. A simple quantitative assessment of the median differences could be made from the overlaying mountain plots. The close correspondence observed between the ROC curves illustrated that assay systems for CA 125 differing in design (type of antibodies used) and format can produce similar results on group level. However, the results of the clinical evaluation underline the importance of the application of assay specific cut-off values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies\",\"volume\":\"35 8\",\"pages\":\"617-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血清ca125检测有助于卵巢癌患者的临床管理。目前,几种基于不同概念和不同方法的分析系统可用于测量CA 125。这种检测系统的方法比较分析通常通过(线性)回归分析进行,这需要对实验数据的分布及其测量误差进行假设。本研究的目的是比较四种新开发的第二代定量分析系统,利用一种替代的简单方法进行方法比较分析。这种选择包括相对差异样地和山地样地的构建,Krouwer等人之前描述过(Eur J clinchem clinbiochem 1995;33:525-7)。此外,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线说明了检测的诊断价值。使用雅培IMx CA 125测定法(Abbott)、Centocor CA 125 II RIA测定法(Centocor)、Berilux Ov CA 125检测试剂盒(Behringwerke)和CA 125 TR-FIA测定法(Wallac Oy)对300名妇女的血清进行CA 125检测。相对差异图和山区图均显示,与雅培IMx系统相比,Centocor RIA II(中位数+33%,P2.5至P97.5: -25%至161%)和Berilux(中位数+28%,P2.5至P97.5: -17%至108%)的血清浓度较高。TR-FIA检测系统显示较低的血清浓度(中位数- 17%,P2.5至P97.5: -74%至229%)。相对差样图和山样图的组合清楚地表明,测量同一分析物的CA 125测定法之间存在很大的差异。相对差异图提供了对测量范围内差异分布的深入了解以及异常值的识别。通过叠加的山地样地,可以对中值差异进行简单的定量评估。在ROC曲线之间观察到的密切对应表明,不同设计(使用的抗体类型)和格式的ca125检测系统可以在组水平上产生相似的结果。然而,临床评估的结果强调了应用测定特定临界值的重要性。
Comparison of four 'second generation' immunoassay systems to determine CA 125 in serum by using a graphical approach to method comparison analysis.
Clinical management of ovarian cancer patients is facilitated by CA 125 determinations in serum. Presently, several assay systems based on different concepts and different methodologies are available to measure CA 125. Method comparison analysis of such assay systems is usually performed through (linear) regression analysis, which requires assumptions about the distribution of experimental data and its measurement error. The aim of the present study was to compare four newly developed second generation assay systems for quantitation of CA 125 by utilizing an alternative simple approach to method comparison analysis. This alternative comprises the construction of relative difference plots and mountain plots, previously described by Krouwer et al. (Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995; 33:525-7). In addition, the diagnostic value of the assays was illustrated through receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves. Sera obtained from 300 women were assayed for CA 125 using the Abbott IMx CA 125 assay (Abbott), the Centocor CA 125 II RIA assay (Centocor), the Berilux Ov testing kit for CA 125 (Behringwerke), and the CA 125 TR-FIA assay (Wallac Oy). Both the relative difference plots and the mountain plots revealed higher serum concentrations with the Centocor RIA II (Median +33%, P2.5 to P97.5: -25% to 161%) and Berilux (Median +28%, P2.5 to P97.5: -17% to 108%) compared to the Abbott IMx system. The TR-FIA assay system showed lower serum concentrations (Median - 17%, P2.5 to P97.5: -74% to 229%). The combination of relative difference plots and mountain plots demonstrated clearly the wide range of differences between CA 125 assays measuring the same analyte. The relative difference plots provided insight into the distribution of the differences over the range of measurement as well as the identification of outliers. A simple quantitative assessment of the median differences could be made from the overlaying mountain plots. The close correspondence observed between the ROC curves illustrated that assay systems for CA 125 differing in design (type of antibodies used) and format can produce similar results on group level. However, the results of the clinical evaluation underline the importance of the application of assay specific cut-off values.