I Kajimoto, Y Hino, S Matsumoto, Y Miyatake, S Nojima
{"title":"[血液透析患者的决策方式]。","authors":"I Kajimoto, Y Hino, S Matsumoto, Y Miyatake, S Nojima","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the decision-making style among the dialysis patients. Subjects were a Convenience sample of hemodialysis patients who agreed to participate this study. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded on the tape and transcribed. Decision-making episodes were picked and interpreted by searchers. Data was analyzed based on the Inductive Theory Approach.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Subject were 21 patients from 4 hospitals. The mean age was 51.1 and the mean duration after they started the hemodialysis was 9.1 years. The 16 decision-making styles were identified: accept, unvacillate, resignation, compromise, perseverance, challenge, self-activation, groupie, crisis-avoidance, withdrawal, prudent, reserve, escape, refusal, dogmatic, and entrust. These 16 decision-making styles were characterized by the reality oriented perception, the constructive regimes, the higher quality of social support. On the other hand, the passive decision-making styles were characterized by the distorted perception, the passive regimes, and the poor social support.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The reality orientation, energy, openness, values system were discussed as key factors which determined the decision-making style among hemodialysis patients. The nursing approach supporting the patients to make their decision were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76067,"journal":{"name":"Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research","volume":"30 2","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Decision-making style among hemodialysis patients].\",\"authors\":\"I Kajimoto, Y Hino, S Matsumoto, Y Miyatake, S Nojima\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the decision-making style among the dialysis patients. Subjects were a Convenience sample of hemodialysis patients who agreed to participate this study. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded on the tape and transcribed. Decision-making episodes were picked and interpreted by searchers. Data was analyzed based on the Inductive Theory Approach.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Subject were 21 patients from 4 hospitals. The mean age was 51.1 and the mean duration after they started the hemodialysis was 9.1 years. The 16 decision-making styles were identified: accept, unvacillate, resignation, compromise, perseverance, challenge, self-activation, groupie, crisis-avoidance, withdrawal, prudent, reserve, escape, refusal, dogmatic, and entrust. These 16 decision-making styles were characterized by the reality oriented perception, the constructive regimes, the higher quality of social support. On the other hand, the passive decision-making styles were characterized by the distorted perception, the passive regimes, and the poor social support.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The reality orientation, energy, openness, values system were discussed as key factors which determined the decision-making style among hemodialysis patients. The nursing approach supporting the patients to make their decision were discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"47-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Decision-making style among hemodialysis patients].
Unlabelled: The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the decision-making style among the dialysis patients. Subjects were a Convenience sample of hemodialysis patients who agreed to participate this study. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews. The interviews were recorded on the tape and transcribed. Decision-making episodes were picked and interpreted by searchers. Data was analyzed based on the Inductive Theory Approach.
Result: Subject were 21 patients from 4 hospitals. The mean age was 51.1 and the mean duration after they started the hemodialysis was 9.1 years. The 16 decision-making styles were identified: accept, unvacillate, resignation, compromise, perseverance, challenge, self-activation, groupie, crisis-avoidance, withdrawal, prudent, reserve, escape, refusal, dogmatic, and entrust. These 16 decision-making styles were characterized by the reality oriented perception, the constructive regimes, the higher quality of social support. On the other hand, the passive decision-making styles were characterized by the distorted perception, the passive regimes, and the poor social support.
Discussion: The reality orientation, energy, openness, values system were discussed as key factors which determined the decision-making style among hemodialysis patients. The nursing approach supporting the patients to make their decision were discussed.