气管内吸入与气管内灌注:颗粒效应的差异

M. Osier, G. Oberdörster
{"title":"气管内吸入与气管内灌注:颗粒效应的差异","authors":"M. Osier,&nbsp;G. Oberdörster","doi":"10.1006/faat.1997.2390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our laboratory has developed a method of intratracheal inhalation whereby rats can be exposed to high aerosol concentrations, resulting in high lung particle burdens in a short time period with deposition occurring directly in the lower respiratory tract, thus avoiding many drawbacks of larger nose-only or whole body inhalation systems. In this report, we compare the response of rats exposed by intratracheal inhalation to “fine” (∼250 nm) and “ultrafine” (∼21 nm) titanium dioxide particles with rats exposed to similar doses by intratracheal instillation. Animals receiving particles through inhalation showed a decreased pulmonary response, measured by bronchoalveolar lavage parameters, in both severity and persistence, when compared with those receiving particles through instillation. These results demonstrate a difference in pulmonary response to an inhaled vs an instilled dose, which may be due to differences in dose rate, particle distribution, or altered clearance between the two methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100557,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 220-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2390","citationCount":"147","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intratracheal Inhalation vs Intratracheal Instillation: Differences in Particle Effects\",\"authors\":\"M. Osier,&nbsp;G. Oberdörster\",\"doi\":\"10.1006/faat.1997.2390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Our laboratory has developed a method of intratracheal inhalation whereby rats can be exposed to high aerosol concentrations, resulting in high lung particle burdens in a short time period with deposition occurring directly in the lower respiratory tract, thus avoiding many drawbacks of larger nose-only or whole body inhalation systems. In this report, we compare the response of rats exposed by intratracheal inhalation to “fine” (∼250 nm) and “ultrafine” (∼21 nm) titanium dioxide particles with rats exposed to similar doses by intratracheal instillation. Animals receiving particles through inhalation showed a decreased pulmonary response, measured by bronchoalveolar lavage parameters, in both severity and persistence, when compared with those receiving particles through instillation. These results demonstrate a difference in pulmonary response to an inhaled vs an instilled dose, which may be due to differences in dose rate, particle distribution, or altered clearance between the two methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 220-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/faat.1997.2390\",\"citationCount\":\"147\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental and Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272059097923903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 147

摘要

我们实验室开发了一种气管内吸入方法,使大鼠暴露于高浓度的气溶胶中,在短时间内导致高肺颗粒负荷,沉积直接发生在下呼吸道,从而避免了大鼻子或全身吸入系统的许多缺点。在本报告中,我们比较了通过气管内吸入暴露于“细”(~ 250 nm)和“超细”(~ 21 nm)二氧化钛颗粒的大鼠与通过气管内注射暴露于相似剂量的大鼠的反应。通过支气管肺泡灌洗参数测量,与通过注射接受颗粒的动物相比,通过吸入接受颗粒的动物在严重程度和持久性方面表现出降低的肺反应。这些结果表明肺部对吸入和灌注剂量的反应不同,这可能是由于两种方法在剂量率、颗粒分布或清除率上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intratracheal Inhalation vs Intratracheal Instillation: Differences in Particle Effects

Our laboratory has developed a method of intratracheal inhalation whereby rats can be exposed to high aerosol concentrations, resulting in high lung particle burdens in a short time period with deposition occurring directly in the lower respiratory tract, thus avoiding many drawbacks of larger nose-only or whole body inhalation systems. In this report, we compare the response of rats exposed by intratracheal inhalation to “fine” (∼250 nm) and “ultrafine” (∼21 nm) titanium dioxide particles with rats exposed to similar doses by intratracheal instillation. Animals receiving particles through inhalation showed a decreased pulmonary response, measured by bronchoalveolar lavage parameters, in both severity and persistence, when compared with those receiving particles through instillation. These results demonstrate a difference in pulmonary response to an inhaled vs an instilled dose, which may be due to differences in dose rate, particle distribution, or altered clearance between the two methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rat Olfactory Mucosa Displays a High Activity in Metabolizing Methyltert-butyl Ether and Other Gasoline Ethers Assessment of Respiratory Hypersensitivity in Guinea Pigs Sensitized to Toluene Diisocyanate: Improvements on Analysis of Respiratory Response Intratracheal Inhalation vs Intratracheal Instillation: Differences in Particle Effects Differences in Caffeine 3-Demethylation Activity among Inbred Mouse Strains: A Comparison of HepaticCyp1a2Gene Expression between Two Inbred Strains Ketoconazole Impairs Early Pregnancy and the Decidual Cell Response via Alterations in Ovarian Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1