生态系统损害评估:生态毒理学研究中的一个重要问题。

F Ramade
{"title":"生态系统损害评估:生态毒理学研究中的一个重要问题。","authors":"F Ramade","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of the environmental impact of pollutants at the ecosystem level raises theoretical and methodological problems of substantial magnitude. Despite the usefulness of a more reductionist approach related to the measure of the effects of pollutant on populations, such as specific toxicity testing or--regarding the assessment of impact of chronic exposure--the use of various biomarkers, these measures do not provide data relevant to conclusions at the community and ecosystem level. The assessment of effect on entire ecosystems requires two kinds of information: (1) What are the consequences of pollutant exposure on the community structure, and (2) what is its impact on fundamental ecological processes that control the ecosystem functioning? Disturbances of structure may be appraised in terms of the major parameters that currently describe it at the community level, such as species richness, ecological diversity, and dominance. The assessment of pollutant effect on ecosystem biodiversity, though underestimated for a long time, is a major issue in applied ecotoxicological research. Accurate attention must be given to keystone species, which in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems control the diversification of the whole trophic web in a community. Therefore, if induced by a given pollutant, the decline of the populations of a keystone species may lead to a major destructing of the community. The second major issue in ecotoxicological research is assessment of damage to ecosystem functioning. Because productivity is of such practical importance, appraising changes in primary and secondary productivity is acutely needed. Indeed, chronic pollutant exposure is a permanent threat to biological natural resources as it impedes their production and renewal. Another major point in the assessment of effects at the ecosystem level is the effect of pollution on natural biogeochemical cycles, as well as the study of the ways through which a number of various and often common contaminants, some of them acting at global scale, interact with such cycles. It is also fundamental to assess the effects of pollutants on decomposer activity in both soil and natural waters and on its interaction with biogeochemical processes such as element recycling. In a larger context, though still almost unexplored, ecotoxicology is related to assessment of effects on complex ecosystem assemblages on a regional scale (i.e., landscape ecology and its relationship to functional ecotoxicology).</p>","PeriodicalId":77339,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","volume":"5 3","pages":"199-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of damage to ecosystems: a major issue in ecotoxicological research.\",\"authors\":\"F Ramade\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The assessment of the environmental impact of pollutants at the ecosystem level raises theoretical and methodological problems of substantial magnitude. Despite the usefulness of a more reductionist approach related to the measure of the effects of pollutant on populations, such as specific toxicity testing or--regarding the assessment of impact of chronic exposure--the use of various biomarkers, these measures do not provide data relevant to conclusions at the community and ecosystem level. The assessment of effect on entire ecosystems requires two kinds of information: (1) What are the consequences of pollutant exposure on the community structure, and (2) what is its impact on fundamental ecological processes that control the ecosystem functioning? Disturbances of structure may be appraised in terms of the major parameters that currently describe it at the community level, such as species richness, ecological diversity, and dominance. The assessment of pollutant effect on ecosystem biodiversity, though underestimated for a long time, is a major issue in applied ecotoxicological research. Accurate attention must be given to keystone species, which in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems control the diversification of the whole trophic web in a community. Therefore, if induced by a given pollutant, the decline of the populations of a keystone species may lead to a major destructing of the community. The second major issue in ecotoxicological research is assessment of damage to ecosystem functioning. Because productivity is of such practical importance, appraising changes in primary and secondary productivity is acutely needed. Indeed, chronic pollutant exposure is a permanent threat to biological natural resources as it impedes their production and renewal. Another major point in the assessment of effects at the ecosystem level is the effect of pollution on natural biogeochemical cycles, as well as the study of the ways through which a number of various and often common contaminants, some of them acting at global scale, interact with such cycles. It is also fundamental to assess the effects of pollutants on decomposer activity in both soil and natural waters and on its interaction with biogeochemical processes such as element recycling. In a larger context, though still almost unexplored, ecotoxicology is related to assessment of effects on complex ecosystem assemblages on a regional scale (i.e., landscape ecology and its relationship to functional ecotoxicology).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"199-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在生态系统水平上对污染物的环境影响的评估提出了重大的理论和方法问题。尽管在衡量污染物对人群的影响方面,有一种更简化的方法是有用的,比如具体的毒性测试,或者——关于长期接触的影响评估——使用各种生物标志物,但这些措施并没有提供与社区和生态系统层面的结论相关的数据。评估对整个生态系统的影响需要两类信息:(1)污染物暴露对群落结构的影响;(2)污染物暴露对控制生态系统功能的基本生态过程的影响。结构的扰动可以根据目前在群落水平上描述它的主要参数来评价,如物种丰富度、生态多样性和优势度。污染物对生态系统生物多样性的影响评价是应用生态毒理学研究的一个重要课题,但长期以来一直被低估。关键物种在陆地和水生生态系统中控制着整个群落营养网的多样化,必须给予准确的关注。因此,如果受到某种污染物的影响,关键物种种群数量的减少可能导致群落的重大破坏。生态毒理学研究的第二个主要问题是评估对生态系统功能的损害。由于生产力具有如此重要的现实意义,因此迫切需要对初级生产力和次级生产力的变化进行评估。事实上,长期接触污染物是对生物自然资源的永久威胁,因为它阻碍了生物自然资源的生产和更新。评估生态系统一级影响的另一个要点是污染对自然生物地球化学循环的影响,以及研究若干不同的、通常是常见的污染物(其中一些在全球范围内起作用)与这些循环相互作用的方式。评估污染物对土壤和自然水体中分解者活动的影响及其与元素循环等生物地球化学过程的相互作用也是至关重要的。在更大的背景下,生态毒理学与评估区域尺度上复杂生态系统组合的影响有关(即景观生态学及其与功能生态毒理学的关系)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of damage to ecosystems: a major issue in ecotoxicological research.

The assessment of the environmental impact of pollutants at the ecosystem level raises theoretical and methodological problems of substantial magnitude. Despite the usefulness of a more reductionist approach related to the measure of the effects of pollutant on populations, such as specific toxicity testing or--regarding the assessment of impact of chronic exposure--the use of various biomarkers, these measures do not provide data relevant to conclusions at the community and ecosystem level. The assessment of effect on entire ecosystems requires two kinds of information: (1) What are the consequences of pollutant exposure on the community structure, and (2) what is its impact on fundamental ecological processes that control the ecosystem functioning? Disturbances of structure may be appraised in terms of the major parameters that currently describe it at the community level, such as species richness, ecological diversity, and dominance. The assessment of pollutant effect on ecosystem biodiversity, though underestimated for a long time, is a major issue in applied ecotoxicological research. Accurate attention must be given to keystone species, which in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems control the diversification of the whole trophic web in a community. Therefore, if induced by a given pollutant, the decline of the populations of a keystone species may lead to a major destructing of the community. The second major issue in ecotoxicological research is assessment of damage to ecosystem functioning. Because productivity is of such practical importance, appraising changes in primary and secondary productivity is acutely needed. Indeed, chronic pollutant exposure is a permanent threat to biological natural resources as it impedes their production and renewal. Another major point in the assessment of effects at the ecosystem level is the effect of pollution on natural biogeochemical cycles, as well as the study of the ways through which a number of various and often common contaminants, some of them acting at global scale, interact with such cycles. It is also fundamental to assess the effects of pollutants on decomposer activity in both soil and natural waters and on its interaction with biogeochemical processes such as element recycling. In a larger context, though still almost unexplored, ecotoxicology is related to assessment of effects on complex ecosystem assemblages on a regional scale (i.e., landscape ecology and its relationship to functional ecotoxicology).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Establishing tolerance levels for customer complaints. Major issues in quality assessment and improvement of clinical hyperbaric services: an international perspective. The use of double anonymity in peer review: a decision whose time has come? Evaluation of customer satisfaction level of different projects. Peer Review as a QA Tool in Environmental Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1