护士对艾滋病信息来源的评价。

K L Irving, E Ferguson, T Cox, W J Farnsworth
{"title":"护士对艾滋病信息来源的评价。","authors":"K L Irving,&nbsp;E Ferguson,&nbsp;T Cox,&nbsp;W J Farnsworth","doi":"10.1177/146642409711700507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reviews of the literature indicate that nurses feel ill-informed about HIV/AIDS and that poor knowledge is associated with anxiety and negative attitudes towards infected patients and their care. Although some studies have sought to identify the sources of HIV/AIDS information available to nurses, few have attempted to understand how nurses evaluate such sources. In this study in 1992, 15 sources of HIV/AIDS information were identified during group discussions with nursing staff and nurse tutors. 277 nursing staff evaluated each of the sources in terms of perceived frequency (how often the source is used) and six items chosen to assess the usability and usefulness of each source (e.g. how informative the source is, how easy it is to understand). The results indicate that in-service training, basic training and professional colleagues are the sources evaluated most highly while posters and advertisements, television and radio and popular newspapers are the most frequently used sources of information. Trades unions' journals and pamphlets are the least frequently used sources of information and receive only modest evaluations. 20% of respondents report never having received any training regarding HIV and AIDS. Implications for the future provision of HIV/AIDS information and directions for further research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of Health","volume":"117 5","pages":"298-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/146642409711700507","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' evaluations of sources of information about HIV and AIDS.\",\"authors\":\"K L Irving,&nbsp;E Ferguson,&nbsp;T Cox,&nbsp;W J Farnsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/146642409711700507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reviews of the literature indicate that nurses feel ill-informed about HIV/AIDS and that poor knowledge is associated with anxiety and negative attitudes towards infected patients and their care. Although some studies have sought to identify the sources of HIV/AIDS information available to nurses, few have attempted to understand how nurses evaluate such sources. In this study in 1992, 15 sources of HIV/AIDS information were identified during group discussions with nursing staff and nurse tutors. 277 nursing staff evaluated each of the sources in terms of perceived frequency (how often the source is used) and six items chosen to assess the usability and usefulness of each source (e.g. how informative the source is, how easy it is to understand). The results indicate that in-service training, basic training and professional colleagues are the sources evaluated most highly while posters and advertisements, television and radio and popular newspapers are the most frequently used sources of information. Trades unions' journals and pamphlets are the least frequently used sources of information and receive only modest evaluations. 20% of respondents report never having received any training regarding HIV and AIDS. Implications for the future provision of HIV/AIDS information and directions for further research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of Health\",\"volume\":\"117 5\",\"pages\":\"298-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/146642409711700507\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Society of Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/146642409711700507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/146642409711700507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

文献综述表明,护士对艾滋病毒/艾滋病知之甚少,知识匮乏与对受感染患者及其护理的焦虑和消极态度有关。尽管一些研究试图确定护士可获得的艾滋病毒/艾滋病信息的来源,但很少有人试图了解护士如何评估这些来源。在1992年的这项研究中,在与护理人员和护士导师的小组讨论中确定了15个艾滋病毒/艾滋病信息来源。277名护理人员根据感知频率(使用频率)和选择六个项目来评估每个来源的可用性和有用性(例如,信息来源的信息量,理解的容易程度)来评估每个来源。结果表明,在职培训、基础培训和专业同事是评价最高的来源,而海报和广告、电视和广播以及通俗报纸是最常用的信息来源。工会的期刊和小册子是最不常用的信息来源,得到的评价也不高。20%的答复者报告从未接受过有关艾滋病毒和艾滋病的任何培训。讨论了今后提供艾滋病毒/艾滋病信息的意义和进一步研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses' evaluations of sources of information about HIV and AIDS.

Reviews of the literature indicate that nurses feel ill-informed about HIV/AIDS and that poor knowledge is associated with anxiety and negative attitudes towards infected patients and their care. Although some studies have sought to identify the sources of HIV/AIDS information available to nurses, few have attempted to understand how nurses evaluate such sources. In this study in 1992, 15 sources of HIV/AIDS information were identified during group discussions with nursing staff and nurse tutors. 277 nursing staff evaluated each of the sources in terms of perceived frequency (how often the source is used) and six items chosen to assess the usability and usefulness of each source (e.g. how informative the source is, how easy it is to understand). The results indicate that in-service training, basic training and professional colleagues are the sources evaluated most highly while posters and advertisements, television and radio and popular newspapers are the most frequently used sources of information. Trades unions' journals and pamphlets are the least frequently used sources of information and receive only modest evaluations. 20% of respondents report never having received any training regarding HIV and AIDS. Implications for the future provision of HIV/AIDS information and directions for further research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New treatment for Parkinson's disease. Lessons to be learned: a case study approach. Primary hyperparathyroidism simulating an acute severe polyneuritis. The growing influence of non governmental organisations (NGOs) in international health: challenges and opportunities. Historical perspectives on health. A historical approach to study of the function and dysfunction of the thyroid gland realised? Re: Essential oils and 'aromatherapy' their modern role in healing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1