进行性肾病患者的盐摄入量与肾脏预后

B Cianciaruso, V Bellizzi, R Minutolo, A Tavera, A Capuano, G Conte, L De Nicola
{"title":"进行性肾病患者的盐摄入量与肾脏预后","authors":"B Cianciaruso,&nbsp;V Bellizzi,&nbsp;R Minutolo,&nbsp;A Tavera,&nbsp;A Capuano,&nbsp;G Conte,&nbsp;L De Nicola","doi":"10.1159/000057385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experimental studies suggest that salt intake plays a critical role in the progressive glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss of established renal disease; however, this issue has never been addressed in humans. To this aim, we have retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), in whom a low-protein diet was prescribed, over a period of about 3 years. On the basis of the daily urinary sodium output, the patients were divided into two groups: a group of patients constantly ingesting > 200 mEq NaCl/day (high sodium intake, HSD, n = 30) and a group in which salt intake was < 100 mEq/day (low sodium intake, LSD, n = 27). Patients taking diuretics or ACE inhibitors were excluded. At baseline, the LSD group, as compared to the HSD group, was characterized by significantly lower creatinine clearance (24 +/- 2 vs. 28 +/- 2 ml/min) and higher proteinuria (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.2 g/day). Despite the presence of these risk factors for progression, and a similar control of blood pressure (the average of the mean arterial pressure during follow-up was 111 +/- 2 mm Hg in LSD and 107 +/- 2 mm Hg in HSD), the LSD patients showed a better renal outcome: in this group, as compared to HSD, the GFR decline was lower (0.25 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.51 +/- 0.09 ml/min/month, p < 0.05), and proteinuria did not change while it markedly increased in HSD. During follow-up, LSD patients also ingested a significantly lower amount of protein. This study therefore suggests that efficacious salt restriction in CRF patients improves the outcome of renal disease independent from its antihypertensive effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":18722,"journal":{"name":"Mineral and electrolyte metabolism","volume":"24 4","pages":"296-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000057385","citationCount":"167","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salt intake and renal outcome in patients with progressive renal disease.\",\"authors\":\"B Cianciaruso,&nbsp;V Bellizzi,&nbsp;R Minutolo,&nbsp;A Tavera,&nbsp;A Capuano,&nbsp;G Conte,&nbsp;L De Nicola\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000057385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Experimental studies suggest that salt intake plays a critical role in the progressive glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss of established renal disease; however, this issue has never been addressed in humans. To this aim, we have retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), in whom a low-protein diet was prescribed, over a period of about 3 years. On the basis of the daily urinary sodium output, the patients were divided into two groups: a group of patients constantly ingesting > 200 mEq NaCl/day (high sodium intake, HSD, n = 30) and a group in which salt intake was < 100 mEq/day (low sodium intake, LSD, n = 27). Patients taking diuretics or ACE inhibitors were excluded. At baseline, the LSD group, as compared to the HSD group, was characterized by significantly lower creatinine clearance (24 +/- 2 vs. 28 +/- 2 ml/min) and higher proteinuria (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.2 g/day). Despite the presence of these risk factors for progression, and a similar control of blood pressure (the average of the mean arterial pressure during follow-up was 111 +/- 2 mm Hg in LSD and 107 +/- 2 mm Hg in HSD), the LSD patients showed a better renal outcome: in this group, as compared to HSD, the GFR decline was lower (0.25 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.51 +/- 0.09 ml/min/month, p < 0.05), and proteinuria did not change while it markedly increased in HSD. During follow-up, LSD patients also ingested a significantly lower amount of protein. This study therefore suggests that efficacious salt restriction in CRF patients improves the outcome of renal disease independent from its antihypertensive effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mineral and electrolyte metabolism\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"296-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000057385\",\"citationCount\":\"167\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mineral and electrolyte metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000057385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineral and electrolyte metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000057385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 167

摘要

实验研究表明,盐摄入在肾脏疾病的进行性肾小球滤过率(GFR)损失中起关键作用;然而,这个问题从未在人类中得到解决。为此,我们回顾性分析了慢性肾衰竭(CRF)患者的临床资料,这些患者在大约3年的时间里服用了低蛋白饮食。根据每日尿钠排泄量将患者分为两组:持续摄入> 200 mEq NaCl/d组(高钠摄入量,HSD, n = 30)和盐摄入量< 100 mEq/d组(低钠摄入量,LSD, n = 27)。排除服用利尿剂或ACE抑制剂的患者。基线时,与HSD组相比,LSD组的特点是肌酐清除率显著降低(24 +/- 2 vs 28 +/- 2 ml/min),蛋白尿较高(2.9 +/- 0.3 vs 1.5 +/- 0.2 g/day)。尽管这些进展的风险因素的存在,和一个类似的控制血压(随访期间平均动脉压的平均值是111 + / - 2毫米汞柱LSD和HSD 107 + / - 2毫米汞柱),迷幻药的患者表现出更好的肾的结果:在这个组,HSD相比,肾小球滤过率(GFR)下降较低(0.25 + / - 0.07和0.51 + / - 0.09毫升/分钟/月,p < 0.05),和蛋白尿没有改变,它在HSD明显增加。在随访期间,LSD患者摄入的蛋白质也明显减少。因此,这项研究表明,有效的限盐治疗可以改善慢性肾功能衰竭患者的预后,而不依赖于其降压作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Salt intake and renal outcome in patients with progressive renal disease.

Experimental studies suggest that salt intake plays a critical role in the progressive glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss of established renal disease; however, this issue has never been addressed in humans. To this aim, we have retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), in whom a low-protein diet was prescribed, over a period of about 3 years. On the basis of the daily urinary sodium output, the patients were divided into two groups: a group of patients constantly ingesting > 200 mEq NaCl/day (high sodium intake, HSD, n = 30) and a group in which salt intake was < 100 mEq/day (low sodium intake, LSD, n = 27). Patients taking diuretics or ACE inhibitors were excluded. At baseline, the LSD group, as compared to the HSD group, was characterized by significantly lower creatinine clearance (24 +/- 2 vs. 28 +/- 2 ml/min) and higher proteinuria (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.2 g/day). Despite the presence of these risk factors for progression, and a similar control of blood pressure (the average of the mean arterial pressure during follow-up was 111 +/- 2 mm Hg in LSD and 107 +/- 2 mm Hg in HSD), the LSD patients showed a better renal outcome: in this group, as compared to HSD, the GFR decline was lower (0.25 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.51 +/- 0.09 ml/min/month, p < 0.05), and proteinuria did not change while it markedly increased in HSD. During follow-up, LSD patients also ingested a significantly lower amount of protein. This study therefore suggests that efficacious salt restriction in CRF patients improves the outcome of renal disease independent from its antihypertensive effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Index Vol. 25, 1999 Manuscript Consultants Contents Vol. 25, 1999 Subject Index Vol. 25, 1999 Subject Index Vol. 25, No. 4–6, 1999
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1