抗生素介导的内毒素释放和革兰氏阴性脓毒症的发病机制。

D C Morrison
{"title":"抗生素介导的内毒素释放和革兰氏阴性脓毒症的发病机制。","authors":"D C Morrison","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the earliest days of antibiotic chemotherapy to treat infection with Gram-negative microbes, investigators have recognized that such treatments may result in the release of microbial constituents that might, in turn, exacerbate the pathophysiological manifestations of disease. Both in vitro studies and in vivo animal experiments have over the years provided evidence in support of this concept; however, the actual clinical importance of this phenomenon to patients with Gram-negative sepsis is unclear. Recently published reports from a number of laboratories have shown that cell wall-active antibiotics that differ in their fundamental mechanisms of action in disrupting microbial growth (via selective interactions with various penicillin binding proteins) also differ in their relative ability to induce the release of biologically active endotoxin both in vitro and in vivo. Further, quantitative differences in total endotoxin release correlate well with antibiotic-initiated morphological changes in the microbe. Of potential significance is the finding that these differences are also reflected in differential production of cytokines from endotoxin-stimulated mononuclear phagocytes and other host target cells, including 11-6 and TNF. Since these immunologic hormones have been strongly implicated as contributing factors to the pathogenesis of Gram-negative sepsis, interest in the potential use of this chemotherapeutic approach as a means of controlling the host immunopathologic response has increased. Carefully controlled clinical trials in which different antibiotic treatments are correlated with production of cytokines will be of significant potential value in evaluating the actual significance of this phenomenon in the Gram-negative septic patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":20686,"journal":{"name":"Progress in clinical and biological research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic-mediated release of endotoxin and the pathogenesis of gram-negative sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"D C Morrison\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the earliest days of antibiotic chemotherapy to treat infection with Gram-negative microbes, investigators have recognized that such treatments may result in the release of microbial constituents that might, in turn, exacerbate the pathophysiological manifestations of disease. Both in vitro studies and in vivo animal experiments have over the years provided evidence in support of this concept; however, the actual clinical importance of this phenomenon to patients with Gram-negative sepsis is unclear. Recently published reports from a number of laboratories have shown that cell wall-active antibiotics that differ in their fundamental mechanisms of action in disrupting microbial growth (via selective interactions with various penicillin binding proteins) also differ in their relative ability to induce the release of biologically active endotoxin both in vitro and in vivo. Further, quantitative differences in total endotoxin release correlate well with antibiotic-initiated morphological changes in the microbe. Of potential significance is the finding that these differences are also reflected in differential production of cytokines from endotoxin-stimulated mononuclear phagocytes and other host target cells, including 11-6 and TNF. Since these immunologic hormones have been strongly implicated as contributing factors to the pathogenesis of Gram-negative sepsis, interest in the potential use of this chemotherapeutic approach as a means of controlling the host immunopathologic response has increased. Carefully controlled clinical trials in which different antibiotic treatments are correlated with production of cytokines will be of significant potential value in evaluating the actual significance of this phenomenon in the Gram-negative septic patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in clinical and biological research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in clinical and biological research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in clinical and biological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自最早使用抗生素化疗治疗革兰氏阴性微生物感染以来,研究人员已经认识到,这种治疗可能导致微生物成分的释放,进而可能加剧疾病的病理生理表现。多年来,体外研究和体内动物实验都提供了支持这一概念的证据;然而,这种现象对革兰氏阴性脓毒症患者的实际临床重要性尚不清楚。最近一些实验室发表的报告表明,细胞壁活性抗生素在破坏微生物生长方面的基本作用机制不同(通过与各种青霉素结合蛋白的选择性相互作用),在诱导生物活性内毒素释放的相对能力上也不同,无论是在体外还是体内。此外,总内毒素释放量的差异与抗生素引起的微生物形态变化密切相关。潜在的重要意义是,这些差异也反映在内毒素刺激的单核吞噬细胞和其他宿主靶细胞产生的细胞因子的差异上,包括11-6和TNF。由于这些免疫激素与革兰氏阴性脓毒症的发病机制密切相关,因此对这种化疗方法作为控制宿主免疫病理反应的手段的潜在应用的兴趣增加了。在严格对照的临床试验中,不同的抗生素治疗与细胞因子的产生相关,对于评估这种现象在革兰氏阴性脓毒症患者中的实际意义具有重要的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic-mediated release of endotoxin and the pathogenesis of gram-negative sepsis.

Since the earliest days of antibiotic chemotherapy to treat infection with Gram-negative microbes, investigators have recognized that such treatments may result in the release of microbial constituents that might, in turn, exacerbate the pathophysiological manifestations of disease. Both in vitro studies and in vivo animal experiments have over the years provided evidence in support of this concept; however, the actual clinical importance of this phenomenon to patients with Gram-negative sepsis is unclear. Recently published reports from a number of laboratories have shown that cell wall-active antibiotics that differ in their fundamental mechanisms of action in disrupting microbial growth (via selective interactions with various penicillin binding proteins) also differ in their relative ability to induce the release of biologically active endotoxin both in vitro and in vivo. Further, quantitative differences in total endotoxin release correlate well with antibiotic-initiated morphological changes in the microbe. Of potential significance is the finding that these differences are also reflected in differential production of cytokines from endotoxin-stimulated mononuclear phagocytes and other host target cells, including 11-6 and TNF. Since these immunologic hormones have been strongly implicated as contributing factors to the pathogenesis of Gram-negative sepsis, interest in the potential use of this chemotherapeutic approach as a means of controlling the host immunopathologic response has increased. Carefully controlled clinical trials in which different antibiotic treatments are correlated with production of cytokines will be of significant potential value in evaluating the actual significance of this phenomenon in the Gram-negative septic patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leukoregulin. Phagocytosis. Radical prostatectomy. Hepatitis A virus. Electrostatic interactions in proteins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1