插入增益与中位耳校正耦合器增益:NHS助听器新用户两种拟合方法的比较。

R G Harrowven
{"title":"插入增益与中位耳校正耦合器增益:NHS助听器新用户两种拟合方法的比较。","authors":"R G Harrowven","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although hearing aid fitting by insertion gain measurement is known to be an accurate and reliable technique, it is rarely used routinely in the UK National Health Service (NHS) because of high demands on staff and time. This study investigated whether an alternative, more practical procedure of fitting by median ear corrected coupler measurements would be as beneficial to NHS patients. Forty patients took part in a double-blind cross-over study comparing the two fitting methods. Results show that the insertion gain fittings were significantly better than the coupler fittings in terms of both patient preference and speech discrimination in noise. It is concluded that, even with the limited response adjustments available, individual deviations from the median ear make routine hearing aid fitting by insertion gain measurement indeed desirable in the NHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 3","pages":"153-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000060","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insertion gain versus median ear corrected coupler gain: a comparison of two fitting methods in new NHS hearing aid users.\",\"authors\":\"R G Harrowven\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/03005364000000060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although hearing aid fitting by insertion gain measurement is known to be an accurate and reliable technique, it is rarely used routinely in the UK National Health Service (NHS) because of high demands on staff and time. This study investigated whether an alternative, more practical procedure of fitting by median ear corrected coupler measurements would be as beneficial to NHS patients. Forty patients took part in a double-blind cross-over study comparing the two fitting methods. Results show that the insertion gain fittings were significantly better than the coupler fittings in terms of both patient preference and speech discrimination in noise. It is concluded that, even with the limited response adjustments available, individual deviations from the median ear make routine hearing aid fitting by insertion gain measurement indeed desirable in the NHS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of audiology\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"153-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000060\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

虽然通过插入增益测量助听器是一种准确可靠的技术,但由于对人员和时间的高要求,它很少在英国国民健康服务(NHS)中常规使用。这项研究调查了一种替代的、更实用的方法,即通过中耳校正耦合器测量进行拟合,是否对NHS患者同样有益。40名患者参加了一项比较两种拟合方法的双盲交叉研究。结果表明,插入增益装置在患者偏好和噪声下的语音识别方面都明显优于耦合器装置。结论是,即使有有限的响应调整,个体偏离中耳使得通过插入增益测量的常规助听器安装在NHS中确实是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insertion gain versus median ear corrected coupler gain: a comparison of two fitting methods in new NHS hearing aid users.

Although hearing aid fitting by insertion gain measurement is known to be an accurate and reliable technique, it is rarely used routinely in the UK National Health Service (NHS) because of high demands on staff and time. This study investigated whether an alternative, more practical procedure of fitting by median ear corrected coupler measurements would be as beneficial to NHS patients. Forty patients took part in a double-blind cross-over study comparing the two fitting methods. Results show that the insertion gain fittings were significantly better than the coupler fittings in terms of both patient preference and speech discrimination in noise. It is concluded that, even with the limited response adjustments available, individual deviations from the median ear make routine hearing aid fitting by insertion gain measurement indeed desirable in the NHS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Audiometer calibration: interpreting and applying the standards. Assessment of aided ABR thresholds before cochlear implantation. Community-based validation of the McCormick Toy Test. Audit of 5-year post-implantation routine integrity tests performed on paediatric cochlear implantees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1