S Wood, S Mason, A Farnsworth, A Davis, D A Curnock, M E Lutman
{"title":"点击引起的耳声发射和听觉脑干反应测试的异常筛选结果。","authors":"S Wood, S Mason, A Farnsworth, A Davis, D A Curnock, M E Lutman","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests were used in parallel to screen 862 neonates with risk factors for hearing loss. Seven neonates (0.81%) passed on TEOAE screen yet failed on ABR in one ear (six neonates) or both ears (one neonate). This combination of results has been termed 'anomalous'. Examination of audiometric results obtained on follow-up shows that in one ear of one neonate the result was consistent with the later confirmed audiogram shape. The explanation for the anomalous results in the remaining ears is unclear although neural maturation and the effects of hyperbilirubinaemia are possibilities. There were no instances of progressive or retrocochlear hearing loss identified. None of the seven neonates had better ear hearing loss of > or = 40 dB on long term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"399-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000091","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anomalous screening outcomes from click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response tests.\",\"authors\":\"S Wood, S Mason, A Farnsworth, A Davis, D A Curnock, M E Lutman\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/03005364000000091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests were used in parallel to screen 862 neonates with risk factors for hearing loss. Seven neonates (0.81%) passed on TEOAE screen yet failed on ABR in one ear (six neonates) or both ears (one neonate). This combination of results has been termed 'anomalous'. Examination of audiometric results obtained on follow-up shows that in one ear of one neonate the result was consistent with the later confirmed audiogram shape. The explanation for the anomalous results in the remaining ears is unclear although neural maturation and the effects of hyperbilirubinaemia are possibilities. There were no instances of progressive or retrocochlear hearing loss identified. None of the seven neonates had better ear hearing loss of > or = 40 dB on long term follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of audiology\",\"volume\":\"32 6\",\"pages\":\"399-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000091\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anomalous screening outcomes from click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response tests.
Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests were used in parallel to screen 862 neonates with risk factors for hearing loss. Seven neonates (0.81%) passed on TEOAE screen yet failed on ABR in one ear (six neonates) or both ears (one neonate). This combination of results has been termed 'anomalous'. Examination of audiometric results obtained on follow-up shows that in one ear of one neonate the result was consistent with the later confirmed audiogram shape. The explanation for the anomalous results in the remaining ears is unclear although neural maturation and the effects of hyperbilirubinaemia are possibilities. There were no instances of progressive or retrocochlear hearing loss identified. None of the seven neonates had better ear hearing loss of > or = 40 dB on long term follow-up.