在市中心的一所高中接触含铅油漆粉尘。

J A Decker, R Malkin, M Kiefer
{"title":"在市中心的一所高中接触含铅油漆粉尘。","authors":"J A Decker,&nbsp;R Malkin,&nbsp;M Kiefer","doi":"10.1080/00028899908984434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to concerns about lead-based paint (LBP) in an 85-year old high school, an evaluation was conducted to determine whether a lead exposure hazard existed for adult school staff. Deteriorating LBP was present on walls and ceilings throughout the school. At the time of the evaluation, abatement of LBP had been completed in approximately one-third of the school. One-hundred eighteen wipe samples for lead dust were collected from floors, teachers' desks, and interior window sills. Areas selected for sampling were based on the work location of the 45 participants providing blood for lead analysis. Wipe samples from hands were collected from all participants. The geometric means (GMs) for lead dust loadings on sills in unabated rooms (n = 23) and abated rooms (n = 16) were 342 and 102 micrograms/ft2, respectively. Nine sills in unabated rooms and one sill in an abated room exceeded the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines (500 micrograms/ft2 lead) for residential housing following abatement activity. GMs for lead loadings on floors in unabated rooms (n = 26) and abated rooms (n = 14) were 136 and 70 micrograms/ft2 lead, respectively. Seventeen floor samples from unabated rooms and 3 samples from abated rooms exceeded HUD guidelines (100 micrograms/ft2 lead). The GM blood lead level (BLL) was 2.2 micrograms/dL (range: 0.6-5.6 micrograms/dL), similar to that of the general U.S. population. Despite peeling LBP and significant lead dust loadings, a hazard from LBP was not found for staff at the school. There were no relationships between surface lead and hand lead, BLL and abatement status of assigned work area, or BLL and hand lead.</p>","PeriodicalId":7930,"journal":{"name":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","volume":"60 2","pages":"191-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984434","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposures to lead-based paint dust in an inner-city high school.\",\"authors\":\"J A Decker,&nbsp;R Malkin,&nbsp;M Kiefer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00028899908984434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In response to concerns about lead-based paint (LBP) in an 85-year old high school, an evaluation was conducted to determine whether a lead exposure hazard existed for adult school staff. Deteriorating LBP was present on walls and ceilings throughout the school. At the time of the evaluation, abatement of LBP had been completed in approximately one-third of the school. One-hundred eighteen wipe samples for lead dust were collected from floors, teachers' desks, and interior window sills. Areas selected for sampling were based on the work location of the 45 participants providing blood for lead analysis. Wipe samples from hands were collected from all participants. The geometric means (GMs) for lead dust loadings on sills in unabated rooms (n = 23) and abated rooms (n = 16) were 342 and 102 micrograms/ft2, respectively. Nine sills in unabated rooms and one sill in an abated room exceeded the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines (500 micrograms/ft2 lead) for residential housing following abatement activity. GMs for lead loadings on floors in unabated rooms (n = 26) and abated rooms (n = 14) were 136 and 70 micrograms/ft2 lead, respectively. Seventeen floor samples from unabated rooms and 3 samples from abated rooms exceeded HUD guidelines (100 micrograms/ft2 lead). The GM blood lead level (BLL) was 2.2 micrograms/dL (range: 0.6-5.6 micrograms/dL), similar to that of the general U.S. population. Despite peeling LBP and significant lead dust loadings, a hazard from LBP was not found for staff at the school. There were no relationships between surface lead and hand lead, BLL and abatement status of assigned work area, or BLL and hand lead.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"191-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984434\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

针对一所有85年历史的高中对含铅涂料(LBP)的担忧,进行了一项评估,以确定成年学校工作人员是否存在铅暴露危害。整个学校的墙壁和天花板上都有不断恶化的LBP。在评估时,大约三分之一的学校已经完成了LBP的消除。从地板、教师书桌和室内窗台上收集了118个铅尘擦拭样本。抽样的区域是根据45名提供血液供铅分析的参与者的工作地点选定的。从所有参与者的手上收集擦拭样本。未消减房间(n = 23)和消减房间(n = 16)窗台上铅尘负荷的几何平均值(gm)分别为342微克/平方英尺和102微克/平方英尺。未消减房间的9个窗台和消减房间的1个窗台超过了住房和城市发展(HUD)的指导方针(500微克/平方英尺铅)。未减碳房间(n = 26)和减碳房间(n = 14)的地板铅负荷gmms分别为136微克/平方英尺铅和70微克/平方英尺铅。17个未消减房间的样品和3个消减房间的样品超过了HUD的指导标准(100微克/平方英尺)。转基因血铅水平(BLL)为2.2微克/分升(范围:0.6-5.6微克/分升),与美国普通人群相似。尽管LBP有剥落和大量的铅尘负荷,但没有发现LBP对学校工作人员的危害。表面铅与手铅、BLL与指定工作区域的减少状况或BLL与手铅之间没有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exposures to lead-based paint dust in an inner-city high school.

In response to concerns about lead-based paint (LBP) in an 85-year old high school, an evaluation was conducted to determine whether a lead exposure hazard existed for adult school staff. Deteriorating LBP was present on walls and ceilings throughout the school. At the time of the evaluation, abatement of LBP had been completed in approximately one-third of the school. One-hundred eighteen wipe samples for lead dust were collected from floors, teachers' desks, and interior window sills. Areas selected for sampling were based on the work location of the 45 participants providing blood for lead analysis. Wipe samples from hands were collected from all participants. The geometric means (GMs) for lead dust loadings on sills in unabated rooms (n = 23) and abated rooms (n = 16) were 342 and 102 micrograms/ft2, respectively. Nine sills in unabated rooms and one sill in an abated room exceeded the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines (500 micrograms/ft2 lead) for residential housing following abatement activity. GMs for lead loadings on floors in unabated rooms (n = 26) and abated rooms (n = 14) were 136 and 70 micrograms/ft2 lead, respectively. Seventeen floor samples from unabated rooms and 3 samples from abated rooms exceeded HUD guidelines (100 micrograms/ft2 lead). The GM blood lead level (BLL) was 2.2 micrograms/dL (range: 0.6-5.6 micrograms/dL), similar to that of the general U.S. population. Despite peeling LBP and significant lead dust loadings, a hazard from LBP was not found for staff at the school. There were no relationships between surface lead and hand lead, BLL and abatement status of assigned work area, or BLL and hand lead.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of leakage from a metal machining center using tracer gas methods: a case study. Assessment of magnetic field exposures for a mortality study at a uranium enrichment plant. An assessment of occupational noise exposures in four construction trades. Prediction of rectal temperature by the Questemp II personal heat strain monitor under low and moderate heat stress. The effects of keyswitch stiffness on typing force, finger electromyography, and subjective discomfort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1