对老年人的持续照顾:注意事项。

Public policy Pub Date : 1981-01-01
W G Weissert
{"title":"对老年人的持续照顾:注意事项。","authors":"W G Weissert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The search for better ways to care for the chronically ill elderly has led to \"alternatives to institutional care.\" A study fo geriatric day care and homemaker services finds that they were used as an add-on to existing care, few patients benefited, and costs were 60-71% higher than costs of a control group. Four more studies have confirmed the lack of substitution effects. Services could be targeted on those who need them even though it is very difficult to do so, and efficacy should be demonstrated before benefits are expended to new services.</p>","PeriodicalId":76390,"journal":{"name":"Public policy","volume":"29 3","pages":"331-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a continuum of care for the elderly: a note of caution.\",\"authors\":\"W G Weissert\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The search for better ways to care for the chronically ill elderly has led to \\\"alternatives to institutional care.\\\" A study fo geriatric day care and homemaker services finds that they were used as an add-on to existing care, few patients benefited, and costs were 60-71% higher than costs of a control group. Four more studies have confirmed the lack of substitution effects. Services could be targeted on those who need them even though it is very difficult to do so, and efficacy should be demonstrated before benefits are expended to new services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public policy\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"331-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寻找更好的方法来照顾慢性病老年人已经导致了“机构护理的替代方案”。一项针对老年日托和家政服务的研究发现,它们被用作现有护理的附加服务,很少有患者从中受益,而且成本比对照组高出60-71%。另有四项研究证实了替代效应的缺失。服务可以针对有需要的人,尽管这样做非常困难,而且在将效益用于新的服务之前,应证明其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a continuum of care for the elderly: a note of caution.

The search for better ways to care for the chronically ill elderly has led to "alternatives to institutional care." A study fo geriatric day care and homemaker services finds that they were used as an add-on to existing care, few patients benefited, and costs were 60-71% higher than costs of a control group. Four more studies have confirmed the lack of substitution effects. Services could be targeted on those who need them even though it is very difficult to do so, and efficacy should be demonstrated before benefits are expended to new services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
سیاستهای آموزشی و حقوق شهروندی کودکان در ایران شناسایی عوامل مرتبط با پایداری ازدواج در مطالعات ایرانی (1388-1398) اندازهگیری و مشخصهسازی تغییر سیاستهای انرژی در گذر زمان: موردکاوی صنعت برق انگلستان تحلیل الگوی کنشگری دانشکدههای حکمرانی جهان در چارچوب پارادایم های توانمندسازی نقش بازیگران مسلح غیردولتی در سیاستگذاری ایران، ترکیه و عربستان سعودی در خاورمیانه
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1