[单位质量保证项目中护士的批判性思维]。

Hoitotiede Pub Date : 1998-01-01
P Nuutinen, M Pelkonen, U Voutilainen
{"title":"[单位质量保证项目中护士的批判性思维]。","authors":"P Nuutinen,&nbsp;M Pelkonen,&nbsp;U Voutilainen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purposes of this study were to describe the objectives and levels of critical thinking among nurses during unit-based quality assurance projects and the meaning of the participation for their own development and nursing practice. The data were collected by interviewing ten nurses who had taken part in the quality assurance projects. The themes used in interviews were created on the basis of two open questions answered by 28 nurses. The data were analysed by using qualitative content analysis and applying the levels of reflective thinking developed by Mezirow (1981), Goodman (1984) and Järvinen (1990). The first level of critical thinking was defined as technical thinking, the second level as reflective thinking and the third level as critical reflection. The results showed that nurses reflected the structural factors of the quality assurance on the technical level. When reflecting their own quality assurance processes (process factors) nurses used their critical thinking on all levels. Very few nurses considered the outcome factors of the quality assurance, but when they focused their thinking on the outcomes the reflection reached all levels. The nurses reflected the meaning of the quality assurance projects on all three levels. According to the nurses, the quality assurance enhanced their professional abilities as well as motivation in work and self-esteem. The quality assurance projects also clarified the principles guiding nursing practice. Interaction between nurses, patients and colleagues became more open.</p>","PeriodicalId":77161,"journal":{"name":"Hoitotiede","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Critical thinking among nurses during unit-based quality assurance projects].\",\"authors\":\"P Nuutinen,&nbsp;M Pelkonen,&nbsp;U Voutilainen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purposes of this study were to describe the objectives and levels of critical thinking among nurses during unit-based quality assurance projects and the meaning of the participation for their own development and nursing practice. The data were collected by interviewing ten nurses who had taken part in the quality assurance projects. The themes used in interviews were created on the basis of two open questions answered by 28 nurses. The data were analysed by using qualitative content analysis and applying the levels of reflective thinking developed by Mezirow (1981), Goodman (1984) and Järvinen (1990). The first level of critical thinking was defined as technical thinking, the second level as reflective thinking and the third level as critical reflection. The results showed that nurses reflected the structural factors of the quality assurance on the technical level. When reflecting their own quality assurance processes (process factors) nurses used their critical thinking on all levels. Very few nurses considered the outcome factors of the quality assurance, but when they focused their thinking on the outcomes the reflection reached all levels. The nurses reflected the meaning of the quality assurance projects on all three levels. According to the nurses, the quality assurance enhanced their professional abilities as well as motivation in work and self-esteem. The quality assurance projects also clarified the principles guiding nursing practice. Interaction between nurses, patients and colleagues became more open.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hoitotiede\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hoitotiede\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hoitotiede","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是描述护士在单位质量保证项目中批判性思维的目标和水平,以及参与对其自身发展和护理实践的意义。通过对参与质量保证项目的10名护士进行访谈收集数据。访谈中使用的主题是根据28名护士回答的两个开放性问题创建的。数据分析采用定性内容分析,并运用Mezirow(1981)、Goodman(1984)和Järvinen(1990)提出的反思性思维水平。批判性思维的第一层次被定义为技术思维,第二层次被定义为反思性思维,第三层次被定义为批判性反思。结果表明,护士在技术层面上体现了质量保证的结构性因素。当反映自己的质量保证过程(过程因素)时,护士在各个层面上都使用了批判性思维。很少有护士考虑质量保证的结果因素,但当他们把注意力集中在结果上时,反思达到了各个层面。护士从三个层面反映了质量保证项目的意义。护士认为,质量保证提高了她们的专业能力,提高了她们的工作积极性和自尊心。质量保证项目也明确了指导护理实践的原则。护士、病人和同事之间的互动变得更加开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Critical thinking among nurses during unit-based quality assurance projects].

The purposes of this study were to describe the objectives and levels of critical thinking among nurses during unit-based quality assurance projects and the meaning of the participation for their own development and nursing practice. The data were collected by interviewing ten nurses who had taken part in the quality assurance projects. The themes used in interviews were created on the basis of two open questions answered by 28 nurses. The data were analysed by using qualitative content analysis and applying the levels of reflective thinking developed by Mezirow (1981), Goodman (1984) and Järvinen (1990). The first level of critical thinking was defined as technical thinking, the second level as reflective thinking and the third level as critical reflection. The results showed that nurses reflected the structural factors of the quality assurance on the technical level. When reflecting their own quality assurance processes (process factors) nurses used their critical thinking on all levels. Very few nurses considered the outcome factors of the quality assurance, but when they focused their thinking on the outcomes the reflection reached all levels. The nurses reflected the meaning of the quality assurance projects on all three levels. According to the nurses, the quality assurance enhanced their professional abilities as well as motivation in work and self-esteem. The quality assurance projects also clarified the principles guiding nursing practice. Interaction between nurses, patients and colleagues became more open.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Psychological load factors and control in the work of occupational health nurses]. [The work of a midwife-public health nurse in northern Finland in 1950-1987]. [Good nursing care in the postnatal wards--mothers' views on the aspect of nursing care]. Nurse educators' well-being at work in Finland. University of Kuopio and University of Turku. Share a Fulbright professor in 1997-1998.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1