在耳声发射和bsamksamy听力学中观察到的微结构模式之间的对应关系。

M E Lutman, J Deeks
{"title":"在耳声发射和bsamksamy听力学中观察到的微结构模式之间的对应关系。","authors":"M E Lutman,&nbsp;J Deeks","doi":"10.3109/00206099909073032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Similar patterns of microstructure have been reported in normal ears for Békésy threshold recordings and various forms of otoacoustic emissions (OAE). It has been suggested that they have a common origin associated with the amplifying function of the outer hair cell system and wave interactions occurring within cochlear mechanics. Fine-frequency Békésy audiometry was conducted in ten normal ears and its microstructure was compared with that recorded using two OAq techniques: stimulus frequency (SFOAE) and distortion product (DPOAE). All sweeps encompassed the frequency range from 992 to 2000 Hz in 16-Hz steps. The same probe was used for all Békésy and OAE recordings to eliminate transducer effects. SFOAEs were obtained with stimulus intensities of 0, 3, 6 and 9 dB. DPOAEs were obtained for 2F1-F2 with primary levels (L1/L2) of 40/30, 45/35, 50/40 and 55/45 dB. Reliable microstructure was recorded in all ears. Mean values of microstructure peak spacing ranged from 5.6 to 9.3 per cent amongst methods, consistent with published data. Microstructure was similar within each OAE method for different stimulus intensities for each subject. However, comparisons between Békésy and OAEs, or between OAE methods, did not show the strong correspondence that would be expected if there were a simple common origin to the microstructure. There was weak support for the expected correspondence between Békésy and SFOAE, but no support for any correspondence between Békésy and DPOAE. It is concluded that the various forms of microstructure cannot be explained by a simple common origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"38 5","pages":"263-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099909073032","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correspondence amongst microstructure patterns observed in otoacoustic emissions and Békésy audiometry.\",\"authors\":\"M E Lutman,&nbsp;J Deeks\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/00206099909073032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Similar patterns of microstructure have been reported in normal ears for Békésy threshold recordings and various forms of otoacoustic emissions (OAE). It has been suggested that they have a common origin associated with the amplifying function of the outer hair cell system and wave interactions occurring within cochlear mechanics. Fine-frequency Békésy audiometry was conducted in ten normal ears and its microstructure was compared with that recorded using two OAq techniques: stimulus frequency (SFOAE) and distortion product (DPOAE). All sweeps encompassed the frequency range from 992 to 2000 Hz in 16-Hz steps. The same probe was used for all Békésy and OAE recordings to eliminate transducer effects. SFOAEs were obtained with stimulus intensities of 0, 3, 6 and 9 dB. DPOAEs were obtained for 2F1-F2 with primary levels (L1/L2) of 40/30, 45/35, 50/40 and 55/45 dB. Reliable microstructure was recorded in all ears. Mean values of microstructure peak spacing ranged from 5.6 to 9.3 per cent amongst methods, consistent with published data. Microstructure was similar within each OAE method for different stimulus intensities for each subject. However, comparisons between Békésy and OAEs, or between OAE methods, did not show the strong correspondence that would be expected if there were a simple common origin to the microstructure. There was weak support for the expected correspondence between Békésy and SFOAE, but no support for any correspondence between Békésy and DPOAE. It is concluded that the various forms of microstructure cannot be explained by a simple common origin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"263-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206099909073032\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099909073032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099909073032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

类似的微结构模式已在正常耳中被报道,用于bsamksamsy阈值记录和各种形式的耳声发射(OAE)。有人认为它们有一个共同的起源,与外毛细胞系统的放大功能和耳蜗力学中发生的波相互作用有关。对10只正常耳进行了细频bsm测听,并与刺激频率(SFOAE)和失真度(DPOAE)两种OAq技术记录的显微结构进行了比较。所有的扫描频率范围从992到2000赫兹,以16赫兹的步骤。相同的探针被用于所有bsamksamsy和OAE记录,以消除换能器的影响。刺激强度分别为0、3、6和9 dB时,分别获得sfoae。2F1-F2的初始水平(L1/L2)分别为40/30、45/35、50/40和55/45 dB。各穗显微结构均记录可靠。不同方法的微结构峰间距平均值为5.6% ~ 9.3%,与已发表的数据一致。在不同的刺激强度下,每种OAE方法的微观结构相似。然而,bsamksamsy和OAE方法之间的比较,或者OAE方法之间的比较,并没有显示出如果微观结构有一个简单的共同起源所期望的强烈的对应关系。bsamksamsy和SFOAE之间的预期对应关系得到弱支持,但bsamksamsy和DPOAE之间没有任何对应关系得到支持。结果表明,不同形式的微观结构不能用一个简单的共同起源来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correspondence amongst microstructure patterns observed in otoacoustic emissions and Békésy audiometry.

Similar patterns of microstructure have been reported in normal ears for Békésy threshold recordings and various forms of otoacoustic emissions (OAE). It has been suggested that they have a common origin associated with the amplifying function of the outer hair cell system and wave interactions occurring within cochlear mechanics. Fine-frequency Békésy audiometry was conducted in ten normal ears and its microstructure was compared with that recorded using two OAq techniques: stimulus frequency (SFOAE) and distortion product (DPOAE). All sweeps encompassed the frequency range from 992 to 2000 Hz in 16-Hz steps. The same probe was used for all Békésy and OAE recordings to eliminate transducer effects. SFOAEs were obtained with stimulus intensities of 0, 3, 6 and 9 dB. DPOAEs were obtained for 2F1-F2 with primary levels (L1/L2) of 40/30, 45/35, 50/40 and 55/45 dB. Reliable microstructure was recorded in all ears. Mean values of microstructure peak spacing ranged from 5.6 to 9.3 per cent amongst methods, consistent with published data. Microstructure was similar within each OAE method for different stimulus intensities for each subject. However, comparisons between Békésy and OAEs, or between OAE methods, did not show the strong correspondence that would be expected if there were a simple common origin to the microstructure. There was weak support for the expected correspondence between Békésy and SFOAE, but no support for any correspondence between Békésy and DPOAE. It is concluded that the various forms of microstructure cannot be explained by a simple common origin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in children in Costa Rica. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Predictive factors for the severity of tinnitus. Ototoxic interaction between noise and pheomelanin: distortion product otoacoustic emissions after acoustical trauma in chloroquine-treated red, black, and albino guinea pigs. Aging and external ear resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1