{"title":"叶状气单胞菌、popoffii气单胞菌DNA杂交组11和501气单胞菌的系统发育定位。","authors":"A J Martínez-Murcia","doi":"10.1099/00207713-49-4-1403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 16S rDNA sequences of the recently described Aeromonas encheleia and Aeromonas popoffii, were determined and compared with data from all known Aeromonas sp. Diagnostic 16S rDNA regions were also sequenced for some strains previously considered as an extension of A. encheleia and a strain of Aeromonas Group 501 (formerly Enteric Group 501). Results indicated that A. encheleia and A. popoffii are phylogenetically separated species as originally described. A conclusion about HG11 taxonomic status is not recommended until previous discrepancies are clarified by further DNA-DNA hybridization and sequencing studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14428,"journal":{"name":"International journal of systematic bacteriology","volume":"49 Pt 4 ","pages":"1403-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1403","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogenetic positions of Aeromonas encheleia, Aeromonas popoffii, Aeromonas DNA hybridization group 11 and Aeromonas group 501.\",\"authors\":\"A J Martínez-Murcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/00207713-49-4-1403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 16S rDNA sequences of the recently described Aeromonas encheleia and Aeromonas popoffii, were determined and compared with data from all known Aeromonas sp. Diagnostic 16S rDNA regions were also sequenced for some strains previously considered as an extension of A. encheleia and a strain of Aeromonas Group 501 (formerly Enteric Group 501). Results indicated that A. encheleia and A. popoffii are phylogenetically separated species as originally described. A conclusion about HG11 taxonomic status is not recommended until previous discrepancies are clarified by further DNA-DNA hybridization and sequencing studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of systematic bacteriology\",\"volume\":\"49 Pt 4 \",\"pages\":\"1403-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1403\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of systematic bacteriology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of systematic bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62
摘要
测定了最近报道的叶状气单胞菌和popoffii气单胞菌的16S rDNA序列，并与所有已知气单胞菌的数据进行了比较。对一些以前被认为是叶状气单胞菌和501气单胞菌群(以前的Enteric Group 501)的延伸菌株进行了诊断性16S rDNA区域测序。结果表明，在系统发育上，切叶拟虫和波波拟虫是分离种。在进一步的DNA-DNA杂交和测序研究澄清之前的差异之前，不建议对HG11的分类地位作出结论。
Phylogenetic positions of Aeromonas encheleia, Aeromonas popoffii, Aeromonas DNA hybridization group 11 and Aeromonas group 501.
The 16S rDNA sequences of the recently described Aeromonas encheleia and Aeromonas popoffii, were determined and compared with data from all known Aeromonas sp. Diagnostic 16S rDNA regions were also sequenced for some strains previously considered as an extension of A. encheleia and a strain of Aeromonas Group 501 (formerly Enteric Group 501). Results indicated that A. encheleia and A. popoffii are phylogenetically separated species as originally described. A conclusion about HG11 taxonomic status is not recommended until previous discrepancies are clarified by further DNA-DNA hybridization and sequencing studies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
