局部淋巴结测定:用于监管目的的验证评估。

G F Gerberick, C A Ryan, I Kimber, R J Dearman, L J Lea, D A Basketter
{"title":"局部淋巴结测定:用于监管目的的验证评估。","authors":"G F Gerberick,&nbsp;C A Ryan,&nbsp;I Kimber,&nbsp;R J Dearman,&nbsp;L J Lea,&nbsp;D A Basketter","doi":"10.1053/ajcd.2000.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For the prediction of skin sensitization potential of substances, the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is an alternative to the widely used guinea pig tests. For more than 10 years, this method has undergone extensive development, evaluation, and validation. In this review, the validation status of the LLNA is considered, specifically with regard to its use for regulatory identification of skin sensitization hazards. The LLNA is a method for the predictive identification of chemicals that have a potential to cause skin sensitization. Activity is measured as a function of lymph node cell proliferative responses stimulated by topical application of test chemicals. The LLNA has successfully passed all reasonable validation stages. It provides a reliable and relevant source of predictive skin sensitization data, which unlike results from guinea pig tests, are reproducible from laboratory to laboratory. In summary, the LLNA is now ready for acceptance as a viable and complete alternative to traditional methods, offering a substantial reduction in animal numbers and refinement opportunities without compromising the standards for the identification of important skin sensitizers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"11 1","pages":"3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.\",\"authors\":\"G F Gerberick,&nbsp;C A Ryan,&nbsp;I Kimber,&nbsp;R J Dearman,&nbsp;L J Lea,&nbsp;D A Basketter\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/ajcd.2000.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For the prediction of skin sensitization potential of substances, the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is an alternative to the widely used guinea pig tests. For more than 10 years, this method has undergone extensive development, evaluation, and validation. In this review, the validation status of the LLNA is considered, specifically with regard to its use for regulatory identification of skin sensitization hazards. The LLNA is a method for the predictive identification of chemicals that have a potential to cause skin sensitization. Activity is measured as a function of lymph node cell proliferative responses stimulated by topical application of test chemicals. The LLNA has successfully passed all reasonable validation stages. It provides a reliable and relevant source of predictive skin sensitization data, which unlike results from guinea pig tests, are reproducible from laboratory to laboratory. In summary, the LLNA is now ready for acceptance as a viable and complete alternative to traditional methods, offering a substantial reduction in animal numbers and refinement opportunities without compromising the standards for the identification of important skin sensitizers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"3-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/ajcd.2000.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/ajcd.2000.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了预测物质的皮肤致敏电位,小鼠局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)是广泛使用的豚鼠试验的替代方法。十多年来,这种方法经历了广泛的开发、评估和验证。在这篇综述中,考虑了LLNA的验证状态,特别是关于其用于皮肤致敏危害的监管鉴定。LLNA是一种预测识别有可能导致皮肤致敏的化学物质的方法。活性被测量为淋巴结细胞增生反应的功能,由局部应用试验化学品刺激。LLNA已成功通过所有合理的验证阶段。它提供了一个可靠和相关的预测皮肤致敏数据来源,与豚鼠试验的结果不同,它在实验室之间是可重复的。总之,LLNA现在已经准备好接受作为传统方法的可行和完整的替代方案,在不影响重要皮肤致敏物鉴定标准的情况下,提供了大量减少动物数量和改进机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.

For the prediction of skin sensitization potential of substances, the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is an alternative to the widely used guinea pig tests. For more than 10 years, this method has undergone extensive development, evaluation, and validation. In this review, the validation status of the LLNA is considered, specifically with regard to its use for regulatory identification of skin sensitization hazards. The LLNA is a method for the predictive identification of chemicals that have a potential to cause skin sensitization. Activity is measured as a function of lymph node cell proliferative responses stimulated by topical application of test chemicals. The LLNA has successfully passed all reasonable validation stages. It provides a reliable and relevant source of predictive skin sensitization data, which unlike results from guinea pig tests, are reproducible from laboratory to laboratory. In summary, the LLNA is now ready for acceptance as a viable and complete alternative to traditional methods, offering a substantial reduction in animal numbers and refinement opportunities without compromising the standards for the identification of important skin sensitizers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allergy to corticosteroids: update and review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and structural cross-reactivity. Factors influencing the induction phase of skin sensitization. Contact dermatitis education in dermatology residency programs: can (will) the American Contact Dermatitis Society be a force for improvement? Contact dermatitis in adolescents. Disperse dyes in fabrics of patients patch-test-positive to disperse dyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1