外侧内括约肌切开术联合痔疮切除术治疗痔疮:一项随机前瞻性研究。

G Galizia, E Lieto, P Castellano, L Pelosio, V Imperatore, C Pigantelli
{"title":"外侧内括约肌切开术联合痔疮切除术治疗痔疮:一项随机前瞻性研究。","authors":"G Galizia,&nbsp;E Lieto,&nbsp;P Castellano,&nbsp;L Pelosio,&nbsp;V Imperatore,&nbsp;C Pigantelli","doi":"10.1080/110241500750009320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate anorectal manometric findings in patients with haemorrhoids and to evaluate the clinical effects and physiological consequences of adding a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) to haemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Teaching hospital, Naples.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>48 consecutive patients with prolapsed piles who had anorectal manometry; 10 healthy volunteers served as controls.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter length and rectoanal inhibitory reflex were recorded. 6 patients were excluded because anal pressures were not raised, so 42 patients were randomised. 22 patients had haemorrhoidectomy plus LIS; and 20 had haemorrhoidectomy alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Morbidity, continence, and anorectal manometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sphincter anomalies were found in 87.5% (n = 42) of patients. Haemorrhoidectomy alone did not affect anal pressures, which returned to the normal ranges after sphincterotomy. Those who had LIS did better postoperatively than those who had did not. 4 patients who did not have a sphincterotomy developed anal strictures. No patient who had LIS developed incontinence of faeces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High anal pressures are common in patients with haemorrhoids suggesting that they may have a pathogenetic role; anorectal manometry is useful in the investigation of anal pressure patterns; and when indicated, lateral sphincterotomy avoids pain, urinary retention, and stenosis, and is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009320","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral internal sphincterotomy together with haemorrhoidectomy for treatment of haemorrhoids: a randomised prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"G Galizia,&nbsp;E Lieto,&nbsp;P Castellano,&nbsp;L Pelosio,&nbsp;V Imperatore,&nbsp;C Pigantelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/110241500750009320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate anorectal manometric findings in patients with haemorrhoids and to evaluate the clinical effects and physiological consequences of adding a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) to haemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Teaching hospital, Naples.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>48 consecutive patients with prolapsed piles who had anorectal manometry; 10 healthy volunteers served as controls.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter length and rectoanal inhibitory reflex were recorded. 6 patients were excluded because anal pressures were not raised, so 42 patients were randomised. 22 patients had haemorrhoidectomy plus LIS; and 20 had haemorrhoidectomy alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Morbidity, continence, and anorectal manometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sphincter anomalies were found in 87.5% (n = 42) of patients. Haemorrhoidectomy alone did not affect anal pressures, which returned to the normal ranges after sphincterotomy. Those who had LIS did better postoperatively than those who had did not. 4 patients who did not have a sphincterotomy developed anal strictures. No patient who had LIS developed incontinence of faeces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High anal pressures are common in patients with haemorrhoids suggesting that they may have a pathogenetic role; anorectal manometry is useful in the investigation of anal pressure patterns; and when indicated, lateral sphincterotomy avoids pain, urinary retention, and stenosis, and is safe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009320\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

摘要

目的:探讨痔患者肛门直肠测压的表现,评价痔切除术加侧内括约肌切开术(LIS)的临床效果和生理后果。设计:随机前瞻性研究。环境:那不勒斯教学医院。患者:连续48例行肛肠测压术的痔疮脱垂患者;10名健康志愿者作为对照。干预措施:记录静息和挤压压力、括约肌长度和直肠抑制反射。6例患者因肛门压力未升高而被排除,共42例患者被随机分组。痔切除术加LIS 22例;20人单独做了痔疮切除术。主要结局指标:发病率、尿失禁和肛肠测压。结果:87.5% (n = 42)的患者发现括约肌异常。单纯痔切除术不影响肛门压力,括约肌切开术后肛门压力恢复正常。患有LIS的患者术后表现优于未患有LIS的患者。4例未行括约肌切开术的患者出现肛门狭窄。没有LIS患者出现大便失禁。结论:高肛压在痔疮患者中很常见,提示其可能具有发病作用;肛门直肠测压法在肛门压力模式的调查中是有用的;当需要时,外侧括约肌切开术可以避免疼痛、尿潴留和狭窄,而且是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lateral internal sphincterotomy together with haemorrhoidectomy for treatment of haemorrhoids: a randomised prospective study.

Objective: To investigate anorectal manometric findings in patients with haemorrhoids and to evaluate the clinical effects and physiological consequences of adding a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) to haemorrhoidectomy.

Design: Randomised prospective study.

Setting: Teaching hospital, Naples.

Patients: 48 consecutive patients with prolapsed piles who had anorectal manometry; 10 healthy volunteers served as controls.

Interventions: Resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter length and rectoanal inhibitory reflex were recorded. 6 patients were excluded because anal pressures were not raised, so 42 patients were randomised. 22 patients had haemorrhoidectomy plus LIS; and 20 had haemorrhoidectomy alone.

Main outcome measures: Morbidity, continence, and anorectal manometry.

Results: Sphincter anomalies were found in 87.5% (n = 42) of patients. Haemorrhoidectomy alone did not affect anal pressures, which returned to the normal ranges after sphincterotomy. Those who had LIS did better postoperatively than those who had did not. 4 patients who did not have a sphincterotomy developed anal strictures. No patient who had LIS developed incontinence of faeces.

Conclusions: High anal pressures are common in patients with haemorrhoids suggesting that they may have a pathogenetic role; anorectal manometry is useful in the investigation of anal pressure patterns; and when indicated, lateral sphincterotomy avoids pain, urinary retention, and stenosis, and is safe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of surgeon's volume on early outcome after total gastrectomy. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic and open 360 degree fundoplication in mild and severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Factors that affect the variability in heart rate during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Risk factors for severe postoperative hypocalcaemia after operations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrphostin AG 556 on acute necrotising pancreatitis in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1