计划生育诊所的多学科学习。

P Baraitser, M Herns, S Webb
{"title":"计划生育诊所的多学科学习。","authors":"P Baraitser, M Herns, S Webb","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of joint learning between clinical and nonclinical members of family planning teams. A multidisciplinary workshop was facilitated by nonexpert facilitators comprising representatives from all disciplines who had received specific training. The workshop included sessions in which clinical and nonclinical staff learned separately and together. The program was evaluated using a questionnaire documenting participants' experience of learning in multidisciplinary teams, a pre- and post-workshop self-assessment of knowledge, a self-assessment of the predicted and actual effect of the workshop on clinical practice, and telephone interviews with the facilitators. Overall, results show that peer-facilitated multidisciplinary learning for clinical and nonclinical staff together is an acceptable form of staff training for family planning teams. Most participants felt comfortable in their learning groups and few reported feeling constrained by inter- or intradisciplinary hierarchies. In conclusion, the exclusion of nonclinical staff from interdisciplinary learning programs represents a missed opportunity for the exchange of ideas between family planning clinic teams.","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 2","pages":"107-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194175","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidisciplinary learning in family planning clinics.\",\"authors\":\"P Baraitser, M Herns, S Webb\",\"doi\":\"10.1783/147118900101194175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of joint learning between clinical and nonclinical members of family planning teams. A multidisciplinary workshop was facilitated by nonexpert facilitators comprising representatives from all disciplines who had received specific training. The workshop included sessions in which clinical and nonclinical staff learned separately and together. The program was evaluated using a questionnaire documenting participants' experience of learning in multidisciplinary teams, a pre- and post-workshop self-assessment of knowledge, a self-assessment of the predicted and actual effect of the workshop on clinical practice, and telephone interviews with the facilitators. Overall, results show that peer-facilitated multidisciplinary learning for clinical and nonclinical staff together is an acceptable form of staff training for family planning teams. Most participants felt comfortable in their learning groups and few reported feeling constrained by inter- or intradisciplinary hierarchies. In conclusion, the exclusion of nonclinical staff from interdisciplinary learning programs represents a missed opportunity for the exchange of ideas between family planning clinic teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of family planning\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"107-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194175\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of family planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of family planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multidisciplinary learning in family planning clinics.
This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of joint learning between clinical and nonclinical members of family planning teams. A multidisciplinary workshop was facilitated by nonexpert facilitators comprising representatives from all disciplines who had received specific training. The workshop included sessions in which clinical and nonclinical staff learned separately and together. The program was evaluated using a questionnaire documenting participants' experience of learning in multidisciplinary teams, a pre- and post-workshop self-assessment of knowledge, a self-assessment of the predicted and actual effect of the workshop on clinical practice, and telephone interviews with the facilitators. Overall, results show that peer-facilitated multidisciplinary learning for clinical and nonclinical staff together is an acceptable form of staff training for family planning teams. Most participants felt comfortable in their learning groups and few reported feeling constrained by inter- or intradisciplinary hierarchies. In conclusion, the exclusion of nonclinical staff from interdisciplinary learning programs represents a missed opportunity for the exchange of ideas between family planning clinic teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of patient-collected vulval swabs for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in a family planning clinic: a pilot study. An interface of chlamydia testing by community family planning clinics and referral to hospital genitourinary medicine clinics. An exploratory study of information-giving used to promote chlamydial test-seeking by students at a college family planning clinic. News online Concepts of compliance: understandings and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1