前提肛成形术和外括约肌牵拉术治疗大便失禁的疗效观察。

Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Pub Date : 2000-01-01
P Aitola, K M Hiltunen, M Matikainen
{"title":"前提肛成形术和外括约肌牵拉术治疗大便失禁的疗效观察。","authors":"P Aitola,&nbsp;K M Hiltunen,&nbsp;M Matikainen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess results of anterior levatorplasty combined with external anal sphincter plication for faecal incontinence.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 44 female patients, 27 with idiopathic and 17 with traumatic faecal incontinence. All underwent anterior levatorplasty and external sphincter plication in our institution between 1986 and 1997. The patients were followed up clinically for a mean 12 (range 2-54) months and 39 (89%) patients also underwent pre-and postoperative anal manometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the idiopathic group 5 patients (19%) estimated that the result of the operation had been good and another 18 (67%) reported feeling better than before; the corresponding figures in the traumatic group were 4 (24%) and 10 (59%). The Wexner incontinence score decreased significantly after the operation in both groups. Nineteen patients (70%) in the idiopathic and 14 (82%) in the traumatic group showed improvement of one or more scores on the Kirwan scale. Three patients regained continence completely, one in the traumatic and two in the idiopathic group. There were no significant improvements in mean resting anal pressure or functional anal canal length in either group. Mean squeeze pressure improved significantly only in the traumatic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the results of anterior levatorplasty combined with external sphincter plication are not perfect, the approach seems to be a valuable alternative in the treatment of patients with idiopathic or traumatic faecal incontinence. Complete continence is seldom achieved, but the grade of incontinence is reduced in the majority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75495,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","volume":"89 1","pages":"29-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional results of anterior levatorplasty and external sphincter plication for faecal incontinence.\",\"authors\":\"P Aitola,&nbsp;K M Hiltunen,&nbsp;M Matikainen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess results of anterior levatorplasty combined with external anal sphincter plication for faecal incontinence.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 44 female patients, 27 with idiopathic and 17 with traumatic faecal incontinence. All underwent anterior levatorplasty and external sphincter plication in our institution between 1986 and 1997. The patients were followed up clinically for a mean 12 (range 2-54) months and 39 (89%) patients also underwent pre-and postoperative anal manometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the idiopathic group 5 patients (19%) estimated that the result of the operation had been good and another 18 (67%) reported feeling better than before; the corresponding figures in the traumatic group were 4 (24%) and 10 (59%). The Wexner incontinence score decreased significantly after the operation in both groups. Nineteen patients (70%) in the idiopathic and 14 (82%) in the traumatic group showed improvement of one or more scores on the Kirwan scale. Three patients regained continence completely, one in the traumatic and two in the idiopathic group. There were no significant improvements in mean resting anal pressure or functional anal canal length in either group. Mean squeeze pressure improved significantly only in the traumatic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the results of anterior levatorplasty combined with external sphincter plication are not perfect, the approach seems to be a valuable alternative in the treatment of patients with idiopathic or traumatic faecal incontinence. Complete continence is seldom achieved, but the grade of incontinence is reduced in the majority of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"29-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究的目的是评估前提肛成形术联合外肛括约肌扩张术治疗大便失禁的效果。材料与方法:研究对象为44例女性患者,其中特发性大便失禁27例,外伤性大便失禁17例。1986年至1997年间,所有患者均接受了前提上睑肌成形术和外括约肌舒张术。临床随访平均12个月(2-54个月),39例(89%)患者接受了术前和术后肛门测压。结果:特发性组5例(19%)患者认为手术效果良好,18例(67%)患者感觉较术前好转;创伤组分别为4例(24%)和10例(59%)。两组患者术后Wexner尿失禁评分均显著降低。19例特发性患者(70%)和14例创伤性患者(82%)在Kirwan量表上表现出一项或多项得分的改善。3例患者完全恢复了失禁,1例在创伤组,2例在特发性组。两组患者的平均静息肛管压力和功能肛管长度均无显著改善。平均挤压压力仅在创伤组有明显改善。结论:虽然前提肛成形术联合外括约肌牵拉术的效果并不完美,但该入路似乎是治疗特发性或外伤性大便失禁的一种有价值的选择。完全尿失禁很少实现,但在大多数患者中,尿失禁的程度降低了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Functional results of anterior levatorplasty and external sphincter plication for faecal incontinence.

Background and aims: The aim of this study was to assess results of anterior levatorplasty combined with external anal sphincter plication for faecal incontinence.

Material and methods: The study involved 44 female patients, 27 with idiopathic and 17 with traumatic faecal incontinence. All underwent anterior levatorplasty and external sphincter plication in our institution between 1986 and 1997. The patients were followed up clinically for a mean 12 (range 2-54) months and 39 (89%) patients also underwent pre-and postoperative anal manometry.

Results: In the idiopathic group 5 patients (19%) estimated that the result of the operation had been good and another 18 (67%) reported feeling better than before; the corresponding figures in the traumatic group were 4 (24%) and 10 (59%). The Wexner incontinence score decreased significantly after the operation in both groups. Nineteen patients (70%) in the idiopathic and 14 (82%) in the traumatic group showed improvement of one or more scores on the Kirwan scale. Three patients regained continence completely, one in the traumatic and two in the idiopathic group. There were no significant improvements in mean resting anal pressure or functional anal canal length in either group. Mean squeeze pressure improved significantly only in the traumatic group.

Conclusions: Although the results of anterior levatorplasty combined with external sphincter plication are not perfect, the approach seems to be a valuable alternative in the treatment of patients with idiopathic or traumatic faecal incontinence. Complete continence is seldom achieved, but the grade of incontinence is reduced in the majority of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pancreatic Lymphoma Toe-to-Hand Transfer Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases Blood, sweat and tears.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1