{"title":"窄带间隙检测的临床程序ⅰ:心理物理程序。","authors":"M Florentine, S Buus, W Geng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines a possible procedure for a clinical gap-detection test that is simple, frequency specific, and reliable. A cued yes-no method of maximum likelihood (MML) procedure was compared to an up-down three-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. Results from five trained and seven naive listeners indicate that the yes-no MML procedure yields valid and efficient estimates of narrowband gap-detection thresholds. Preliminary tests yield encouraging results.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"39 3","pages":"161-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a clinical procedure for narrowband gap detection I: a psychophysical procedure.\",\"authors\":\"M Florentine, S Buus, W Geng\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper examines a possible procedure for a clinical gap-detection test that is simple, frequency specific, and reliable. A cued yes-no method of maximum likelihood (MML) procedure was compared to an up-down three-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. Results from five trained and seven naive listeners indicate that the yes-no MML procedure yields valid and efficient estimates of narrowband gap-detection thresholds. Preliminary tests yield encouraging results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"161-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward a clinical procedure for narrowband gap detection I: a psychophysical procedure.
This paper examines a possible procedure for a clinical gap-detection test that is simple, frequency specific, and reliable. A cued yes-no method of maximum likelihood (MML) procedure was compared to an up-down three-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. Results from five trained and seven naive listeners indicate that the yes-no MML procedure yields valid and efficient estimates of narrowband gap-detection thresholds. Preliminary tests yield encouraging results.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
