{"title":"水稻和玉米质体之间的 RNA 编辑保护:大多数编辑事件是否可有可无?","authors":"S Corneille, K Lutz, P Maliga","doi":"10.1007/s004380000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extent of conservation of RNA editing sites in the plastid genome of rice was determined by comparing the genomic sequence with that of the cDNA. The presence of a T in the cDNA predicted to be a C by the DNA sequence of the plastid genome, indicated C to U editing. In the 11 plastid transcripts of rice a total of 21 editing sites were found. In maize, a closely related grass species, 26 editing sites have been reported in 13 plastid transcripts. Most editing sites are conserved between the two species, although differences in RNA editing were found at eight sites. In seven cases the T was already encoded at the DNA level, eliminating the requirement for RNA editing. In one case (rpoB, codon 206) the RNA sequence was conserved between the two species, but the mRNA is still not edited in rice. It appears that, although evolutionarily conserved, RNA editing is essential only for a few plastid editing sites. Information about RNA editing in rice plastids will facilitate the design of plastid vectors with broad applicability in grass species.</p>","PeriodicalId":18636,"journal":{"name":"Molecular & general genetics : MGG","volume":"264 4","pages":"419-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s004380000295","citationCount":"106","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation of RNA editing between rice and maize plastids: are most editing events dispensable?\",\"authors\":\"S Corneille, K Lutz, P Maliga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s004380000295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The extent of conservation of RNA editing sites in the plastid genome of rice was determined by comparing the genomic sequence with that of the cDNA. The presence of a T in the cDNA predicted to be a C by the DNA sequence of the plastid genome, indicated C to U editing. In the 11 plastid transcripts of rice a total of 21 editing sites were found. In maize, a closely related grass species, 26 editing sites have been reported in 13 plastid transcripts. Most editing sites are conserved between the two species, although differences in RNA editing were found at eight sites. In seven cases the T was already encoded at the DNA level, eliminating the requirement for RNA editing. In one case (rpoB, codon 206) the RNA sequence was conserved between the two species, but the mRNA is still not edited in rice. It appears that, although evolutionarily conserved, RNA editing is essential only for a few plastid editing sites. Information about RNA editing in rice plastids will facilitate the design of plastid vectors with broad applicability in grass species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular & general genetics : MGG\",\"volume\":\"264 4\",\"pages\":\"419-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s004380000295\",\"citationCount\":\"106\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular & general genetics : MGG\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380000295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular & general genetics : MGG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380000295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 106
摘要
通过比较基因组序列和 cDNA 序列,确定了水稻质体基因组中 RNA 编辑位点的保留程度。根据质体基因组 DNA 序列预测,cDNA 中的 T 应为 C,这表明 C 编辑为 U 编辑。在水稻的 11 个质体转录本中,总共发现了 21 个编辑位点。在玉米(一种近缘禾本科植物)的 13 个质体转录本中,发现了 26 个编辑位点。这两个物种的大多数编辑位点是保守的,但在 8 个位点上发现了 RNA 编辑的差异。在七个案例中,T 已经在 DNA 水平上编码,因此不需要 RNA 编辑。在一种情况下(rpoB,密码子 206),两个物种之间的 RNA 序列是一致的,但在水稻中 mRNA 仍未被编辑。由此看来,尽管 RNA 编辑在进化过程中是保守的,但它只对少数几个质粒编辑位点必不可少。有关水稻质体中 RNA 编辑的信息将有助于设计广泛适用于禾本科物种的质体载体。
Conservation of RNA editing between rice and maize plastids: are most editing events dispensable?
The extent of conservation of RNA editing sites in the plastid genome of rice was determined by comparing the genomic sequence with that of the cDNA. The presence of a T in the cDNA predicted to be a C by the DNA sequence of the plastid genome, indicated C to U editing. In the 11 plastid transcripts of rice a total of 21 editing sites were found. In maize, a closely related grass species, 26 editing sites have been reported in 13 plastid transcripts. Most editing sites are conserved between the two species, although differences in RNA editing were found at eight sites. In seven cases the T was already encoded at the DNA level, eliminating the requirement for RNA editing. In one case (rpoB, codon 206) the RNA sequence was conserved between the two species, but the mRNA is still not edited in rice. It appears that, although evolutionarily conserved, RNA editing is essential only for a few plastid editing sites. Information about RNA editing in rice plastids will facilitate the design of plastid vectors with broad applicability in grass species.