Stefano Spiezia , Antonio Salvio , Carolina Di Somma , Caterina Scelzi , Angelo Pio Assanti , Francesco Giannattasio , Maria Varriale , Mario Visconti
{"title":"超声指导下肝活检在门诊的疗效","authors":"Stefano Spiezia , Antonio Salvio , Carolina Di Somma , Caterina Scelzi , Angelo Pio Assanti , Francesco Giannattasio , Maria Varriale , Mario Visconti","doi":"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> To evaluate the safety and compliance of outpatient echo-guided liver biopsy (ELB) when compared to those performed on inpatients (IP). <em>Methods:</em> From June 1996 to November 2000, we carried out 418 ELB on patients with diffuse liver disease: 246 inpatients (IP ELB) and 172 in a Day Hospital setting (DH ELB). The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed for both groups of patients, performing the same echo-guided intercostal liver biopsy with free-hand technique and post biopsy assessment with colordoppler examination; post biopsy follow-up consisted of 6-h bed rest and blood pressure and heart rate monitoring up to discharge. DH patients were discharged 8 h after biopsy, if they did not live further than a 30-min trip from the hospital. In both groups, the following data was evaluated: death rate, sample adequacy, number of passages, major and minor complications, pain score. <em>Results:</em> The data analysed in our series show that ELB DH presents no fundamental differences in morbidity and mortality when compared to ELB IP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79592,"journal":{"name":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 127-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of liver biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance on an outpatient basis\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Spiezia , Antonio Salvio , Carolina Di Somma , Caterina Scelzi , Angelo Pio Assanti , Francesco Giannattasio , Maria Varriale , Mario Visconti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> To evaluate the safety and compliance of outpatient echo-guided liver biopsy (ELB) when compared to those performed on inpatients (IP). <em>Methods:</em> From June 1996 to November 2000, we carried out 418 ELB on patients with diffuse liver disease: 246 inpatients (IP ELB) and 172 in a Day Hospital setting (DH ELB). The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed for both groups of patients, performing the same echo-guided intercostal liver biopsy with free-hand technique and post biopsy assessment with colordoppler examination; post biopsy follow-up consisted of 6-h bed rest and blood pressure and heart rate monitoring up to discharge. DH patients were discharged 8 h after biopsy, if they did not live further than a 30-min trip from the hospital. In both groups, the following data was evaluated: death rate, sample adequacy, number of passages, major and minor complications, pain score. <em>Results:</em> The data analysed in our series show that ELB DH presents no fundamental differences in morbidity and mortality when compared to ELB IP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 127-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826602000332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The efficacy of liver biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance on an outpatient basis
Objective: To evaluate the safety and compliance of outpatient echo-guided liver biopsy (ELB) when compared to those performed on inpatients (IP). Methods: From June 1996 to November 2000, we carried out 418 ELB on patients with diffuse liver disease: 246 inpatients (IP ELB) and 172 in a Day Hospital setting (DH ELB). The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed for both groups of patients, performing the same echo-guided intercostal liver biopsy with free-hand technique and post biopsy assessment with colordoppler examination; post biopsy follow-up consisted of 6-h bed rest and blood pressure and heart rate monitoring up to discharge. DH patients were discharged 8 h after biopsy, if they did not live further than a 30-min trip from the hospital. In both groups, the following data was evaluated: death rate, sample adequacy, number of passages, major and minor complications, pain score. Results: The data analysed in our series show that ELB DH presents no fundamental differences in morbidity and mortality when compared to ELB IP.