德国的蜱传脑炎(TBE)——流行病学数据、危险地区的发展以及野外收集的蜱和从人类身上移走的蜱中的病毒流行率

Jochen Süss , Christina Schrader , Ulrich Falk , Nikolaus Wohanka
{"title":"德国的蜱传脑炎(TBE)——流行病学数据、危险地区的发展以及野外收集的蜱和从人类身上移走的蜱中的病毒流行率","authors":"Jochen Süss ,&nbsp;Christina Schrader ,&nbsp;Ulrich Falk ,&nbsp;Nikolaus Wohanka","doi":"10.1016/S1433-1128(04)80011-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Germany, 100–300 autochthonous clinical TBE cases have been recorded annually. There are high-risk areas in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg and ongoing low-risk areas in Hesse, Thuringia, and the Rhineland-Palatinate and single cases in Saxony.</p><p>In order to be able to evaluate the epidemiological changes described here, it must be mentioned that a new definition of TBE risk areas was introduced on the district level in 1998 in Germany and in 2001 with the new Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz) which states that TBE is a notifiable disease. This led to the replacement of earlier surveillance systems and to many changes to data collection.</p><p>In 1998 63 country and town districts were TBE risk areas, in 2001 79 and in 2002 86. There were new risk districts within Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg and outside these regions in Thuringia, Hesse and the Rhineland-Palatinate.</p><p>An interesting trend was observed in TBE epidemiology. The TBE incidence in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg has been stable on a high level for years; outside these areas it has steadily been climbing (Odenwald, Thuringia).</p><p>On the basis of epidemiological data on TBE from the eastern part of Germany since 1960, it is obvious that major changes in virus activity in TBE risk areas also occurred in the past, the explanation of which has remained a matter for speculation.</p><p>The epidemiological situation in the different risk areas for TBE in Germany was found to vary considerably, if one considers the surveillance data of the last 40 years.</p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>Establishment of completely new low-risk areas.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>Reactivation of formerly active areas with endemic latency.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>High-risk areas with stable viral activity over long periods.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>High-risk areas which have expanded and merged with low-risk areas.</p></span></li><li><span>5.</span><span><p>High-risk areas which have developed into endemic areas or become inactive.</p></span></li></ul><p>High-risk TBE areas from 1960–1975 (i.e. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) have since completely disappeared. There were, at the same time, high-risk areas in Thuringia which had only become latent and have now obviously become active again. The Odenwald demonstrated growing virus activity in the 1990s. These changes in TBE activity in German risk areas over more than the last 40 years are presented schematically. This ongoing number of risk areas is certainly linked to the notification obligation and greater public awareness. Nevertheless, any effects of ecological and climatic changes on the natural foci cannot be ruled out nor can change sin human leisure behaviour. Local weather conditions also have a major effect on the TBE incidence. Warm and dry summers may cause low tick activities, rainy summers may lead to low exposure rates of human beings. Even changes in forms of agricultural production prompted by different political structures probably have an impact as do economic constraints which may lead to lower vaccination and higher exposure rates.</p><p>Regular, systematic virus prevalence measurements from 1997 to 2002 in field-collected ticks in German high-risk areas do not indicate any risk increase nor do they suggest a downward trend.</p><p>Studies on virus prevalence in questing versus partially engorged ticks indicate that we neither exactly know nor understand the real quantitative relations between the virus and the host. In a first study, virus prevalence in <em>Ixodes ricinus</em> removed from humans was examined. Humans which were exposed in some districts near Passau in Bavaria. In the autumn of 2001, virus prevalence of unengorged free-living nymphs (n=820) in this area was 0.38 (0.08–1.1)% and of adults (n=90) 1.17 (0.03–6.38)%. Surprisingly, virus prevalence in partially engorged ticks from the same area collected during the same period was significantly higher (nymphs, n=86, 6.9% and adults, n=129, 9.3%). Virus-positive partially engorged ticks were only found in districts known as risk areas. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence data of the PCR products have confirmed the presence of virus prototype Neudoerfl only.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100707,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Microbiology Supplements","volume":"293 ","pages":"Pages 69-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1433-1128(04)80011-1","citationCount":"105","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in Germany — Epidemiological data, development of risk areas and virus prevalence in field-collected ticks and in ticks removed from humans\",\"authors\":\"Jochen Süss ,&nbsp;Christina Schrader ,&nbsp;Ulrich Falk ,&nbsp;Nikolaus Wohanka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1433-1128(04)80011-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In Germany, 100–300 autochthonous clinical TBE cases have been recorded annually. There are high-risk areas in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg and ongoing low-risk areas in Hesse, Thuringia, and the Rhineland-Palatinate and single cases in Saxony.</p><p>In order to be able to evaluate the epidemiological changes described here, it must be mentioned that a new definition of TBE risk areas was introduced on the district level in 1998 in Germany and in 2001 with the new Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz) which states that TBE is a notifiable disease. This led to the replacement of earlier surveillance systems and to many changes to data collection.</p><p>In 1998 63 country and town districts were TBE risk areas, in 2001 79 and in 2002 86. There were new risk districts within Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg and outside these regions in Thuringia, Hesse and the Rhineland-Palatinate.</p><p>An interesting trend was observed in TBE epidemiology. The TBE incidence in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg has been stable on a high level for years; outside these areas it has steadily been climbing (Odenwald, Thuringia).</p><p>On the basis of epidemiological data on TBE from the eastern part of Germany since 1960, it is obvious that major changes in virus activity in TBE risk areas also occurred in the past, the explanation of which has remained a matter for speculation.</p><p>The epidemiological situation in the different risk areas for TBE in Germany was found to vary considerably, if one considers the surveillance data of the last 40 years.</p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>Establishment of completely new low-risk areas.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>Reactivation of formerly active areas with endemic latency.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>High-risk areas with stable viral activity over long periods.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>High-risk areas which have expanded and merged with low-risk areas.</p></span></li><li><span>5.</span><span><p>High-risk areas which have developed into endemic areas or become inactive.</p></span></li></ul><p>High-risk TBE areas from 1960–1975 (i.e. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) have since completely disappeared. There were, at the same time, high-risk areas in Thuringia which had only become latent and have now obviously become active again. The Odenwald demonstrated growing virus activity in the 1990s. These changes in TBE activity in German risk areas over more than the last 40 years are presented schematically. This ongoing number of risk areas is certainly linked to the notification obligation and greater public awareness. Nevertheless, any effects of ecological and climatic changes on the natural foci cannot be ruled out nor can change sin human leisure behaviour. Local weather conditions also have a major effect on the TBE incidence. Warm and dry summers may cause low tick activities, rainy summers may lead to low exposure rates of human beings. Even changes in forms of agricultural production prompted by different political structures probably have an impact as do economic constraints which may lead to lower vaccination and higher exposure rates.</p><p>Regular, systematic virus prevalence measurements from 1997 to 2002 in field-collected ticks in German high-risk areas do not indicate any risk increase nor do they suggest a downward trend.</p><p>Studies on virus prevalence in questing versus partially engorged ticks indicate that we neither exactly know nor understand the real quantitative relations between the virus and the host. In a first study, virus prevalence in <em>Ixodes ricinus</em> removed from humans was examined. Humans which were exposed in some districts near Passau in Bavaria. In the autumn of 2001, virus prevalence of unengorged free-living nymphs (n=820) in this area was 0.38 (0.08–1.1)% and of adults (n=90) 1.17 (0.03–6.38)%. Surprisingly, virus prevalence in partially engorged ticks from the same area collected during the same period was significantly higher (nymphs, n=86, 6.9% and adults, n=129, 9.3%). Virus-positive partially engorged ticks were only found in districts known as risk areas. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence data of the PCR products have confirmed the presence of virus prototype Neudoerfl only.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Microbiology Supplements\",\"volume\":\"293 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1433-1128(04)80011-1\",\"citationCount\":\"105\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Microbiology Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433112804800111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Microbiology Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433112804800111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

摘要

在德国,每年有100-300例本地临床TBE病例记录。巴伐利亚州和巴登-符腾堡州有高风险地区,黑森州、图林根州和莱茵兰-普法尔茨州有持续的低风险地区,萨克森州有单一病例。为了能够评估这里所描述的流行病学变化,必须提到的是,1998年德国在地区一级引入了关于脑炎危险区的新定义,并于2001年通过了新的《感染保护法》(Infektionsschutzgesetz),其中规定脑炎是一种必须报告的疾病。这导致更换了早期的监测系统,并对数据收集进行了许多更改。1998年,63个乡村和城镇地区是be的危险区,2001年为79个,2002年为86个。在巴伐利亚州和巴登-符腾堡州以及这些地区以外的图林根州、黑森州和莱茵兰-普法尔茨州都出现了新的危险地区。在be流行病学中观察到一个有趣的趋势。巴伐利亚州和巴登-符腾堡州的脑炎发病率多年来一直稳定在较高水平;在这些地区之外,它一直在稳步攀升(奥登瓦尔德,图林根州)。根据1960年以来德国东部流行性脑炎的流行病学数据,很明显,过去也发生过流行性脑炎危险地区病毒活动的重大变化,其解释仍然是一个猜测问题。如果考虑到过去40年的监测数据,就会发现德国不同危险地区的流行病学情况差异很大。建立全新的低风险地区。重新激活具有地方性潜伏的以前活跃的区域。病毒活动长期稳定的高风险地区。4 .高风险地区扩大并与低风险地区合并。高风险地区已发展为流行地区或变得不活跃。1960-1975年的高危地区(即梅克伦堡-西波美拉尼亚)已经完全消失。与此同时,图林根州有一些高风险地区,这些地区刚刚变得潜伏,现在显然又变得活跃起来。奥登瓦尔德病毒在20世纪90年代表现出越来越强的活性。在过去的40多年里,德国风险地区的be活动发生了这些变化。不断增加的风险领域当然与通知义务和提高公众意识有关。然而,不能排除生态和气候变化对自然焦点的任何影响,也不能改变人类的休闲行为。当地的天气条件对TBE的发病率也有重要影响。温暖干燥的夏季可能导致蜱虫活动减少,多雨的夏季可能导致人类的接触率降低。即使是由不同政治结构引起的农业生产形式的变化也可能产生影响,经济限制也可能导致疫苗接种率降低和接触率升高。从1997年到2002年,对德国高风险地区野外采集的蜱虫进行了定期、系统的病毒流行率测量,结果显示风险没有增加,也没有下降趋势。对病毒在寻找和部分充血蜱中的流行率的研究表明,我们既不确切地知道也不了解病毒与宿主之间的真正定量关系。在第一项研究中,检查了从人类身上取出的蓖麻伊蚊的病毒流行情况。在巴伐利亚州帕绍附近的一些地区暴露的人类。2001年秋季,该地区未充血的自由生活若虫(n=820)的病毒感染率为0.38(0.08-1.1)%,成虫(n=90)的病毒感染率为1.17(0.03-6.38)%。令人惊讶的是,同一时期在同一地区采集的部分充血蜱的病毒流行率明显更高(若虫,n=86, 6.9%,成虫,n=129, 9.3%)。病毒阳性部分充血蜱只在被称为危险地区的地区被发现。PCR产物的核苷酸和推导出的氨基酸序列数据证实了病毒原型Neudoerfl的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in Germany — Epidemiological data, development of risk areas and virus prevalence in field-collected ticks and in ticks removed from humans

In Germany, 100–300 autochthonous clinical TBE cases have been recorded annually. There are high-risk areas in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg and ongoing low-risk areas in Hesse, Thuringia, and the Rhineland-Palatinate and single cases in Saxony.

In order to be able to evaluate the epidemiological changes described here, it must be mentioned that a new definition of TBE risk areas was introduced on the district level in 1998 in Germany and in 2001 with the new Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz) which states that TBE is a notifiable disease. This led to the replacement of earlier surveillance systems and to many changes to data collection.

In 1998 63 country and town districts were TBE risk areas, in 2001 79 and in 2002 86. There were new risk districts within Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg and outside these regions in Thuringia, Hesse and the Rhineland-Palatinate.

An interesting trend was observed in TBE epidemiology. The TBE incidence in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg has been stable on a high level for years; outside these areas it has steadily been climbing (Odenwald, Thuringia).

On the basis of epidemiological data on TBE from the eastern part of Germany since 1960, it is obvious that major changes in virus activity in TBE risk areas also occurred in the past, the explanation of which has remained a matter for speculation.

The epidemiological situation in the different risk areas for TBE in Germany was found to vary considerably, if one considers the surveillance data of the last 40 years.

  • 1.

    Establishment of completely new low-risk areas.

  • 2.

    Reactivation of formerly active areas with endemic latency.

  • 3.

    High-risk areas with stable viral activity over long periods.

  • 4.

    High-risk areas which have expanded and merged with low-risk areas.

  • 5.

    High-risk areas which have developed into endemic areas or become inactive.

High-risk TBE areas from 1960–1975 (i.e. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania) have since completely disappeared. There were, at the same time, high-risk areas in Thuringia which had only become latent and have now obviously become active again. The Odenwald demonstrated growing virus activity in the 1990s. These changes in TBE activity in German risk areas over more than the last 40 years are presented schematically. This ongoing number of risk areas is certainly linked to the notification obligation and greater public awareness. Nevertheless, any effects of ecological and climatic changes on the natural foci cannot be ruled out nor can change sin human leisure behaviour. Local weather conditions also have a major effect on the TBE incidence. Warm and dry summers may cause low tick activities, rainy summers may lead to low exposure rates of human beings. Even changes in forms of agricultural production prompted by different political structures probably have an impact as do economic constraints which may lead to lower vaccination and higher exposure rates.

Regular, systematic virus prevalence measurements from 1997 to 2002 in field-collected ticks in German high-risk areas do not indicate any risk increase nor do they suggest a downward trend.

Studies on virus prevalence in questing versus partially engorged ticks indicate that we neither exactly know nor understand the real quantitative relations between the virus and the host. In a first study, virus prevalence in Ixodes ricinus removed from humans was examined. Humans which were exposed in some districts near Passau in Bavaria. In the autumn of 2001, virus prevalence of unengorged free-living nymphs (n=820) in this area was 0.38 (0.08–1.1)% and of adults (n=90) 1.17 (0.03–6.38)%. Surprisingly, virus prevalence in partially engorged ticks from the same area collected during the same period was significantly higher (nymphs, n=86, 6.9% and adults, n=129, 9.3%). Virus-positive partially engorged ticks were only found in districts known as risk areas. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence data of the PCR products have confirmed the presence of virus prototype Neudoerfl only.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunological characterization of the complement regulator factor H-binding CRASP and Erp proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi Significant improvement of the recombinant Borrelia IgG immunoblot for serodiagnosis of early neuroborreliosis Disappearance of specific immune response after successful therapy of chronic Lyme borreliosis Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. OspA-types are widespread in Bavaria but show distinct local patterns The zoonotic reservoir of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in the Mazury Lakes district of North-Eastern Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1