灌溉区各种设计模式的评价

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1007/s13762-023-05159-2
F. Salmasi, J. Abraham, A. Salmasi
{"title":"灌溉区各种设计模式的评价","authors":"F. Salmasi,&nbsp;J. Abraham,&nbsp;A. Salmasi","doi":"10.1007/s13762-023-05159-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sedimentation basins are structures that separate suspended sediments from river flows at irrigation intakes. There are many ways to design these sedimentation basins, some of which lead to unrealistic results because of their simplifying assumptions. Some of these methods are complex and are extremely difficult to use. Meanwhile, other methods to reduce the above problems have been proposed by a number of researchers that are based on laboratory or analytical studies. Due to the existence of various models, it is difficult to determine which approach is the most appropriate model. Here, by introducing multiple methods, their performance has been evaluated by comparison with laboratory data. Experiments were conducted on a flume 12 m in length, 1.2 m in width, and 0.5 m in height for three sediment sizes and for different discharges. Trapping efficiencies were calculated based on the remaining sediment in the invert of the flume after completion of the experiment. The results showed that the United States bureau of reclamation model shows a high efficiency of the sedimentation basins. In addition, it was found that the efficiency estimates of this model are very sensitive to input parameters. Examination of various statistical characteristics showed that the trapping efficiency in this study is consistent with the Sarikaya and Einstein models. Also, a regression equation with an accuracy of RMS = 7.32 can be used to estimate the trapping efficiency in irrigation sediment basins.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"20 10","pages":"11301 - 11308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-023-05159-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of various design models of irrigation sedimentation basins\",\"authors\":\"F. Salmasi,&nbsp;J. Abraham,&nbsp;A. Salmasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13762-023-05159-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sedimentation basins are structures that separate suspended sediments from river flows at irrigation intakes. There are many ways to design these sedimentation basins, some of which lead to unrealistic results because of their simplifying assumptions. Some of these methods are complex and are extremely difficult to use. Meanwhile, other methods to reduce the above problems have been proposed by a number of researchers that are based on laboratory or analytical studies. Due to the existence of various models, it is difficult to determine which approach is the most appropriate model. Here, by introducing multiple methods, their performance has been evaluated by comparison with laboratory data. Experiments were conducted on a flume 12 m in length, 1.2 m in width, and 0.5 m in height for three sediment sizes and for different discharges. Trapping efficiencies were calculated based on the remaining sediment in the invert of the flume after completion of the experiment. The results showed that the United States bureau of reclamation model shows a high efficiency of the sedimentation basins. In addition, it was found that the efficiency estimates of this model are very sensitive to input parameters. Examination of various statistical characteristics showed that the trapping efficiency in this study is consistent with the Sarikaya and Einstein models. Also, a regression equation with an accuracy of RMS = 7.32 can be used to estimate the trapping efficiency in irrigation sediment basins.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"11301 - 11308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-023-05159-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-023-05159-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-023-05159-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沉淀池是在灌溉取水口将悬浮沉积物从河水中分离出来的结构。设计这些沉积盆地的方法有很多种,其中一些方法由于假设过于简单而导致了不切实际的结果。其中一些方法很复杂,使用起来极其困难。与此同时,一些研究人员提出了基于实验室或分析研究的其他方法来减少上述问题。由于各种模型的存在,很难确定哪种方法是最合适的模型。在这里,通过引入多种方法,通过与实验室数据的比较来评估它们的性能。实验是在一个长12米、宽1.2米、高0.5米的水槽上进行的,水槽有三种泥沙大小和不同的流量。实验完成后,根据水槽倒立处的剩余沉积物计算捕集效率。结果表明,美国垦务局的模型显示出较高的沉积盆地效率。此外,还发现该模型的效率估计对输入参数非常敏感。对各种统计特征的检验表明,本研究中的捕获效率与Sarikaya和Einstein模型一致。利用RMS = 7.32的回归方程可以估计灌溉水沙流域的截留效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of various design models of irrigation sedimentation basins

Sedimentation basins are structures that separate suspended sediments from river flows at irrigation intakes. There are many ways to design these sedimentation basins, some of which lead to unrealistic results because of their simplifying assumptions. Some of these methods are complex and are extremely difficult to use. Meanwhile, other methods to reduce the above problems have been proposed by a number of researchers that are based on laboratory or analytical studies. Due to the existence of various models, it is difficult to determine which approach is the most appropriate model. Here, by introducing multiple methods, their performance has been evaluated by comparison with laboratory data. Experiments were conducted on a flume 12 m in length, 1.2 m in width, and 0.5 m in height for three sediment sizes and for different discharges. Trapping efficiencies were calculated based on the remaining sediment in the invert of the flume after completion of the experiment. The results showed that the United States bureau of reclamation model shows a high efficiency of the sedimentation basins. In addition, it was found that the efficiency estimates of this model are very sensitive to input parameters. Examination of various statistical characteristics showed that the trapping efficiency in this study is consistent with the Sarikaya and Einstein models. Also, a regression equation with an accuracy of RMS = 7.32 can be used to estimate the trapping efficiency in irrigation sediment basins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
期刊最新文献
Novel magnetic chitosan Schiff base impregnated with ZnO for removal of malachite green dye from aqueous environment A comprehensive experimental analysis on biodiesel/toluene ratio and SOI change in a diesel engine under medium load conditions Sorption of zinc chloride complexes from acid-based solutions by using anionic resins: process optimization and modelling Enhancing runoff treatment using green porous concrete incorporating recycled aggregates Phytoremediation potential of duckweed (Lemna minor L.) for hexavalent chromium removal in synthetic wastewater: unveiling physiological response and defense mechanisms against excessive heavy metal uptake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1