适当治疗的腹膜透析和血液透析患者某些人体测量值的比较。

Agnieszka Magdalena Grzebalska, Maria Majdan, Ewa Bober, Grazyna Orłowska-Kowalik, Andrzej Ksiazek
{"title":"适当治疗的腹膜透析和血液透析患者某些人体测量值的比较。","authors":"Agnieszka Magdalena Grzebalska,&nbsp;Maria Majdan,&nbsp;Ewa Bober,&nbsp;Grazyna Orłowska-Kowalik,&nbsp;Andrzej Ksiazek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some anthropometric measurements are usually used to estimate the nutritional status of dialysis patients. The aim of our study was the comparison of some anthropometric measurements in patients adequately (from the clinical point of view) treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). The study was performed on 40 chronic dialysis (both: PD and HD), non-diabetic patients, without any inflammatory process. The patients were divided into two groups, 20 patients in each: I peritoneal dialysis patients (PD-pts), II--hemodialysis patients (HD-pts). In each patient body mass index (BMI), total body water (TBW), lean body mass (LBM), fat body mass (FBM), upper limb musculature (ULM), mid arm circumference in tension and in rest MAC-t and MAC-r), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) and dialysis index (Kt/V) were determined. The obtained values were analyzed statistically and compared between the groups. In peritoneal dialysis the patients' higher values of BMI, FBM, MAC and TSF (p < 0.01), as well as higher LBM and ULM (p < 0.05) than those in hemodialysis patients were observed. TBW was not statistically different in the PD and HD patients (p > 0.05). Mean Kt/V values observed were as follows: 2.16 +/- 0.48 in PD patients vs 1.05 +/- 0.35 in the HD patients; (p < 0.01). We conclude that adequately treated, from the clinical point of view the PD patients had better anthropometric indicators of nutritional status than the adequately treated HD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8245,"journal":{"name":"Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio D: Medicina","volume":"59 1","pages":"20-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between some anthropometric measurements in adequately treated peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Agnieszka Magdalena Grzebalska,&nbsp;Maria Majdan,&nbsp;Ewa Bober,&nbsp;Grazyna Orłowska-Kowalik,&nbsp;Andrzej Ksiazek\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Some anthropometric measurements are usually used to estimate the nutritional status of dialysis patients. The aim of our study was the comparison of some anthropometric measurements in patients adequately (from the clinical point of view) treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). The study was performed on 40 chronic dialysis (both: PD and HD), non-diabetic patients, without any inflammatory process. The patients were divided into two groups, 20 patients in each: I peritoneal dialysis patients (PD-pts), II--hemodialysis patients (HD-pts). In each patient body mass index (BMI), total body water (TBW), lean body mass (LBM), fat body mass (FBM), upper limb musculature (ULM), mid arm circumference in tension and in rest MAC-t and MAC-r), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) and dialysis index (Kt/V) were determined. The obtained values were analyzed statistically and compared between the groups. In peritoneal dialysis the patients' higher values of BMI, FBM, MAC and TSF (p < 0.01), as well as higher LBM and ULM (p < 0.05) than those in hemodialysis patients were observed. TBW was not statistically different in the PD and HD patients (p > 0.05). Mean Kt/V values observed were as follows: 2.16 +/- 0.48 in PD patients vs 1.05 +/- 0.35 in the HD patients; (p < 0.01). We conclude that adequately treated, from the clinical point of view the PD patients had better anthropometric indicators of nutritional status than the adequately treated HD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio D: Medicina\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"20-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio D: Medicina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio D: Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些人体测量通常用于估计透析患者的营养状况。我们研究的目的是比较(从临床角度来看)充分接受腹膜透析(PD)和血液透析(HD)治疗的患者的一些人体测量值。该研究对40例慢性透析(PD和HD)非糖尿病患者进行,无任何炎症过程。将患者分为两组,每组20例:I腹膜透析患者(PD-pts), II血液透析患者(HD-pts)。测定每位患者的身体质量指数(BMI)、全身水分(TBW)、瘦体重(LBM)、脂肪体重(FBM)、上肢肌肉组织(ULM)、紧张状态和休息状态下的中臂围(MAC-t和MAC-r)、三头肌皮褶厚度(TSF)和透析指数(Kt/V)。对所得值进行统计分析,并进行组间比较。腹膜透析组BMI、FBM、MAC、TSF高于血液透析组(p < 0.01), LBM、ULM高于血液透析组(p < 0.05)。PD与HD患者TBW差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。观察到的平均Kt/V值如下:PD患者为2.16 +/- 0.48,HD患者为1.05 +/- 0.35;(p < 0.01)。我们得出结论,从临床角度来看,充分治疗的PD患者比充分治疗的HD患者具有更好的营养状况人体测量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between some anthropometric measurements in adequately treated peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients.

Some anthropometric measurements are usually used to estimate the nutritional status of dialysis patients. The aim of our study was the comparison of some anthropometric measurements in patients adequately (from the clinical point of view) treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). The study was performed on 40 chronic dialysis (both: PD and HD), non-diabetic patients, without any inflammatory process. The patients were divided into two groups, 20 patients in each: I peritoneal dialysis patients (PD-pts), II--hemodialysis patients (HD-pts). In each patient body mass index (BMI), total body water (TBW), lean body mass (LBM), fat body mass (FBM), upper limb musculature (ULM), mid arm circumference in tension and in rest MAC-t and MAC-r), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) and dialysis index (Kt/V) were determined. The obtained values were analyzed statistically and compared between the groups. In peritoneal dialysis the patients' higher values of BMI, FBM, MAC and TSF (p < 0.01), as well as higher LBM and ULM (p < 0.05) than those in hemodialysis patients were observed. TBW was not statistically different in the PD and HD patients (p > 0.05). Mean Kt/V values observed were as follows: 2.16 +/- 0.48 in PD patients vs 1.05 +/- 0.35 in the HD patients; (p < 0.01). We conclude that adequately treated, from the clinical point of view the PD patients had better anthropometric indicators of nutritional status than the adequately treated HD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lymphangitis carcinomatosa in thin section computed tomography. Morphological characteristics of malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. High resolution computed tomography in sarcoidosis: typical findings. Comparison between some anthropometric measurements in adequately treated peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. Knowledge of rules of healthy lifestyle and their realization among students of junior and senior high schools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1