三种PCR方法评价多发性硬化症患者干扰素- β生物活性的比较

Francesca Gilli, Fabiana Marnetto, Guglielmo Stefanuto, Valentina Rinaldi, Federica Farinazzo, Simona Malucchi, Marco Capobianco, Marzia Caldano, Arianna Sala, Antonio Bertolotto
{"title":"三种PCR方法评价多发性硬化症患者干扰素- β生物活性的比较","authors":"Francesca Gilli,&nbsp;Fabiana Marnetto,&nbsp;Guglielmo Stefanuto,&nbsp;Valentina Rinaldi,&nbsp;Federica Farinazzo,&nbsp;Simona Malucchi,&nbsp;Marco Capobianco,&nbsp;Marzia Caldano,&nbsp;Arianna Sala,&nbsp;Antonio Bertolotto","doi":"10.1007/BF03260063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gene expression of the myxovirus-resistant protein A (MxA) gene is a sensitive measure of the biological response of therapeutically applied interferon-beta (IFNbeta) and of its reduced bioavailability due to inhibiting factors such as IFNbeta-induced neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared three methods for MxA mRNA quantification in 826 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples obtained from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MxA mRNA measurements were performed using quantitative-competitive (qc)-PCR, real time-PCR, and the new semi-quantitative (sq)-PCR assay (MxA IBRIDOGEN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the treatment status (untreated samples versus NAb-negative treated samples), real time-PCR gave the highest specificity (93%). Slightly lower specificities were obtained with qc-PCR and sq-PCR (both 91%). qc-PCR showed the highest sensitivity (97%) compared with both real time-PCR (94%) and sq-PCR (95%). A positive correlation was found between qc-PCR and real time-PCR measurements (rspearman=0.776; p<0.0001), which also showed 90% agreement based on a statistically calculated threshold. Likewise, sq-PCR evaluations showed 84% and 79% agreement with qc-PCR and real time-PCR measurements, respectively. In addition, we showed a concordance of 89% between three sq-PCR kits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three methods displayed high specificity for MxA gene expression analysis, allowing the detection of patients in whom IFNbeta did not have any biological action. qc-PCR and real time-PCR are both useful during clinical trials demanding quantitative data of biological activity, whereas sq-PCR could prove useful for routine screening purposes because it is easy to perform and can be done in not specialized laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":79690,"journal":{"name":"Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology","volume":"8 3","pages":"185-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03260063","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of three PCR assays for the evaluation of interferon-beta biological activity in patients with multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Gilli,&nbsp;Fabiana Marnetto,&nbsp;Guglielmo Stefanuto,&nbsp;Valentina Rinaldi,&nbsp;Federica Farinazzo,&nbsp;Simona Malucchi,&nbsp;Marco Capobianco,&nbsp;Marzia Caldano,&nbsp;Arianna Sala,&nbsp;Antonio Bertolotto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03260063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gene expression of the myxovirus-resistant protein A (MxA) gene is a sensitive measure of the biological response of therapeutically applied interferon-beta (IFNbeta) and of its reduced bioavailability due to inhibiting factors such as IFNbeta-induced neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared three methods for MxA mRNA quantification in 826 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples obtained from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MxA mRNA measurements were performed using quantitative-competitive (qc)-PCR, real time-PCR, and the new semi-quantitative (sq)-PCR assay (MxA IBRIDOGEN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the treatment status (untreated samples versus NAb-negative treated samples), real time-PCR gave the highest specificity (93%). Slightly lower specificities were obtained with qc-PCR and sq-PCR (both 91%). qc-PCR showed the highest sensitivity (97%) compared with both real time-PCR (94%) and sq-PCR (95%). A positive correlation was found between qc-PCR and real time-PCR measurements (rspearman=0.776; p<0.0001), which also showed 90% agreement based on a statistically calculated threshold. Likewise, sq-PCR evaluations showed 84% and 79% agreement with qc-PCR and real time-PCR measurements, respectively. In addition, we showed a concordance of 89% between three sq-PCR kits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three methods displayed high specificity for MxA gene expression analysis, allowing the detection of patients in whom IFNbeta did not have any biological action. qc-PCR and real time-PCR are both useful during clinical trials demanding quantitative data of biological activity, whereas sq-PCR could prove useful for routine screening purposes because it is easy to perform and can be done in not specialized laboratories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"185-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03260063\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03260063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03260063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:黏液病毒耐药蛋白A (MxA)基因的表达是治疗应用干扰素- β (ifnβ)的生物反应及其由于抑制因子(如ifnβ诱导的中和抗体(nab))而降低的生物利用度的敏感指标。方法:对826例多发性硬化症(MS)患者外周血单个核细胞(PBMC) MxA mRNA的三种定量方法进行比较。使用定量竞争(qc)-PCR、实时pcr和新型半定量(sq)-PCR (MxA IBRIDOGEN)检测MxA mRNA。结果:根据处理状态(未处理与nab阴性处理),real - time-PCR的特异性最高(93%)。qc-PCR和sq-PCR的特异性略低(均为91%)。与real - time-PCR(94%)和sq-PCR(95%)相比,qc-PCR的灵敏度最高(97%)。qc-PCR结果与real - time-PCR结果呈正相关(rspearman=0.776;结论:这三种方法对MxA基因表达分析均具有高特异性,可检测出IFNbeta无任何生物学作用的患者。在需要生物活性定量数据的临床试验中,qc-PCR和real - time-PCR都是有用的,而sq-PCR可以用于常规筛选目的,因为它易于执行,并且可以在非专门实验室中完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of three PCR assays for the evaluation of interferon-beta biological activity in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Background: The gene expression of the myxovirus-resistant protein A (MxA) gene is a sensitive measure of the biological response of therapeutically applied interferon-beta (IFNbeta) and of its reduced bioavailability due to inhibiting factors such as IFNbeta-induced neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).

Methods: We compared three methods for MxA mRNA quantification in 826 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples obtained from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MxA mRNA measurements were performed using quantitative-competitive (qc)-PCR, real time-PCR, and the new semi-quantitative (sq)-PCR assay (MxA IBRIDOGEN).

Results: According to the treatment status (untreated samples versus NAb-negative treated samples), real time-PCR gave the highest specificity (93%). Slightly lower specificities were obtained with qc-PCR and sq-PCR (both 91%). qc-PCR showed the highest sensitivity (97%) compared with both real time-PCR (94%) and sq-PCR (95%). A positive correlation was found between qc-PCR and real time-PCR measurements (rspearman=0.776; p<0.0001), which also showed 90% agreement based on a statistically calculated threshold. Likewise, sq-PCR evaluations showed 84% and 79% agreement with qc-PCR and real time-PCR measurements, respectively. In addition, we showed a concordance of 89% between three sq-PCR kits.

Conclusions: All three methods displayed high specificity for MxA gene expression analysis, allowing the detection of patients in whom IFNbeta did not have any biological action. qc-PCR and real time-PCR are both useful during clinical trials demanding quantitative data of biological activity, whereas sq-PCR could prove useful for routine screening purposes because it is easy to perform and can be done in not specialized laboratories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic conferences : january-june 2006. Summary of recent deal activity. An improved method of elimination of DNA from PCR reagents. Touch-down reverse transcriptase-PCR detection of IgV(H) rearrangement and Sybr-Green-based real-time RT-PCR quantitation of minimal residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Instability of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood lysates: importance for PCR DNA-based diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1