ICU感染的宿主诊断生物标志物:我们在哪里,我们要去哪里?

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Current Infectious Disease Reports Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s11908-021-00747-0
Aaron J Heffernan, Kerina J Denny
{"title":"ICU感染的宿主诊断生物标志物:我们在哪里,我们要去哪里?","authors":"Aaron J Heffernan,&nbsp;Kerina J Denny","doi":"10.1007/s11908-021-00747-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Early identification of infection in the critically ill patient and initiation of appropriate treatment is key to reducing morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials leads to harms, many of which may be exaggerated in the critically ill population. The current method of diagnosing infection in the intensive care unit relies heavily on clinical gestalt; however, this approach is plagued by biases. Therefore, a reliable, independent biomarker holds promise in the accurate determination of infection. We discuss currently used host biomarkers used in the intensive care unit and review new and emerging approaches to biomarker discovery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>White cell count (including total white cell count, left shift, and the neutrophil-leucocyte ratio), C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin are the most common host diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis used in current clinical practice. However, their utility in the initial diagnosis of infection, and their role in the subsequent decision to commence treatment, remains limited. Novel approaches to biomarker discovery that are currently being investigated include combination biomarkers, host 'sepsis signatures' based on differential gene expression, site-specific biomarkers, biomechanical assays, and incorporation of new and pre-existing host biomarkers into machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To date, no single reliable independent biomarker of infection exists. Whilst new approaches to biomarker discovery hold promise, their clinical utility may be limited if previous mistakes that have afflicted sepsis biomarker research continue to be repeated.</p>","PeriodicalId":48839,"journal":{"name":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"23 4","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11908-021-00747-0","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Host Diagnostic Biomarkers of Infection in the ICU: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?\",\"authors\":\"Aaron J Heffernan,&nbsp;Kerina J Denny\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11908-021-00747-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Early identification of infection in the critically ill patient and initiation of appropriate treatment is key to reducing morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials leads to harms, many of which may be exaggerated in the critically ill population. The current method of diagnosing infection in the intensive care unit relies heavily on clinical gestalt; however, this approach is plagued by biases. Therefore, a reliable, independent biomarker holds promise in the accurate determination of infection. We discuss currently used host biomarkers used in the intensive care unit and review new and emerging approaches to biomarker discovery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>White cell count (including total white cell count, left shift, and the neutrophil-leucocyte ratio), C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin are the most common host diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis used in current clinical practice. However, their utility in the initial diagnosis of infection, and their role in the subsequent decision to commence treatment, remains limited. Novel approaches to biomarker discovery that are currently being investigated include combination biomarkers, host 'sepsis signatures' based on differential gene expression, site-specific biomarkers, biomechanical assays, and incorporation of new and pre-existing host biomarkers into machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To date, no single reliable independent biomarker of infection exists. Whilst new approaches to biomarker discovery hold promise, their clinical utility may be limited if previous mistakes that have afflicted sepsis biomarker research continue to be repeated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Infectious Disease Reports\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11908-021-00747-0\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Infectious Disease Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-021-00747-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-021-00747-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

综述目的:早期发现危重患者感染并开始适当治疗是降低发病率和死亡率的关键。另一方面,滥用抗微生物药物会造成危害,其中许多危害在重症人群中可能被夸大。目前在重症监护病房诊断感染的方法严重依赖于临床完形;然而,这种方法受到偏见的困扰。因此,一种可靠的、独立的生物标志物有望准确地确定感染。我们讨论了目前在重症监护病房使用的宿主生物标志物,并回顾了生物标志物发现的新方法。最近发现:白细胞计数(包括总白细胞计数、左移和中性粒细胞-白细胞比率)、c反应蛋白和降钙素原是目前临床实践中最常用的败血症宿主诊断生物标志物。然而,它们在感染的初步诊断中的效用以及在随后决定开始治疗中的作用仍然有限。目前正在研究的生物标志物发现的新方法包括组合生物标志物、基于差异基因表达的宿主败血症特征、位点特异性生物标志物、生物力学分析,以及将新的和已有的宿主生物标志物纳入机器学习算法。摘要:迄今为止,尚不存在单一可靠的独立感染生物标志物。虽然生物标志物发现的新方法有希望,但如果先前影响败血症生物标志物研究的错误继续重复,它们的临床应用可能会受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Host Diagnostic Biomarkers of Infection in the ICU: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Purpose of review: Early identification of infection in the critically ill patient and initiation of appropriate treatment is key to reducing morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials leads to harms, many of which may be exaggerated in the critically ill population. The current method of diagnosing infection in the intensive care unit relies heavily on clinical gestalt; however, this approach is plagued by biases. Therefore, a reliable, independent biomarker holds promise in the accurate determination of infection. We discuss currently used host biomarkers used in the intensive care unit and review new and emerging approaches to biomarker discovery.

Recent findings: White cell count (including total white cell count, left shift, and the neutrophil-leucocyte ratio), C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin are the most common host diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis used in current clinical practice. However, their utility in the initial diagnosis of infection, and their role in the subsequent decision to commence treatment, remains limited. Novel approaches to biomarker discovery that are currently being investigated include combination biomarkers, host 'sepsis signatures' based on differential gene expression, site-specific biomarkers, biomechanical assays, and incorporation of new and pre-existing host biomarkers into machine learning algorithms.

Summary: To date, no single reliable independent biomarker of infection exists. Whilst new approaches to biomarker discovery hold promise, their clinical utility may be limited if previous mistakes that have afflicted sepsis biomarker research continue to be repeated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Infectious Disease Reports
Current Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of infectious disease. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, tropical and travel medicine, and urinary tract infections. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists.
期刊最新文献
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Pulmonary Infection in Children with Cystic Fibrosis Gastrointestinal Manifestation of MPox Climate Change and Meningoencephalitis in the Americas: A Brewing Storm Norovirus Infection in Transplant Recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1