骨科住院医师选择标准:项目主任的调查与分析。

Spartan medical research journal Pub Date : 2020-01-30
Michael McDonald, Saad Khan, Clarence Cabatu, Fremont Scott
{"title":"骨科住院医师选择标准:项目主任的调查与分析。","authors":"Michael McDonald, Saad Khan, Clarence Cabatu, Fremont Scott","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Orthopaedic Surgery has become one of the most competitive specialties. Each year the number of applicants is far greater than the number of available Orthopaedic residency training spots [1,2,3]. With medical schools expanding their class sizes and new medical schools opening out of proportion to the number of residency spots, the competition is becoming even more fierce [12]. There are several published articles on resident selection in allopathic orthopaedic programs [5-7]. However, there are currently no such published studies on osteopathic orthopaedic programs to our knowledge. With the AOA and ACGME merger, this topic is critical to both allopathic and osteopathic applicants alike. The goal of our study was to evaluate the resident selection criteria for osteopathic orthopaedic residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A twenty-five-question survey was sent to all of the osteopathic orthopaedic programs in December of 2017. The most important selection factors were then calculated as a mean of all the responses and were ranked accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 29 out of 41 program directors (71%). The most important factors in resident selection were performance during the student's rotation at the program, formality/politeness and performance in the interview, and medical school board exam scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the most comprehensive study to date on the osteopathic orthopaedic resident selection process. The results from this study will help future applicants, both MD and DO, to focus on the factors in resident selection. The results may also help programs evaluate their own selection process and make improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"11598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteopathic Orthopaedic Residency Selection Criteria: Program Directors' Survey and Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michael McDonald, Saad Khan, Clarence Cabatu, Fremont Scott\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Orthopaedic Surgery has become one of the most competitive specialties. Each year the number of applicants is far greater than the number of available Orthopaedic residency training spots [1,2,3]. With medical schools expanding their class sizes and new medical schools opening out of proportion to the number of residency spots, the competition is becoming even more fierce [12]. There are several published articles on resident selection in allopathic orthopaedic programs [5-7]. However, there are currently no such published studies on osteopathic orthopaedic programs to our knowledge. With the AOA and ACGME merger, this topic is critical to both allopathic and osteopathic applicants alike. The goal of our study was to evaluate the resident selection criteria for osteopathic orthopaedic residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A twenty-five-question survey was sent to all of the osteopathic orthopaedic programs in December of 2017. The most important selection factors were then calculated as a mean of all the responses and were ranked accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 29 out of 41 program directors (71%). The most important factors in resident selection were performance during the student's rotation at the program, formality/politeness and performance in the interview, and medical school board exam scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the most comprehensive study to date on the osteopathic orthopaedic resident selection process. The results from this study will help future applicants, both MD and DO, to focus on the factors in resident selection. The results may also help programs evaluate their own selection process and make improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spartan medical research journal\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"11598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746051/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spartan medical research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨科手术已经成为最具竞争力的专业之一。每年的申请人数远远大于骨科住院医师培训名额的数量[1,2,3]。随着医学院扩大班级规模,新医学院的开设与住院医师名额不成比例,竞争变得更加激烈[12]。有几篇关于对抗性骨科项目住院医师选择的文章发表[5-7]。然而,据我们所知,目前还没有发表关于骨科骨科项目的研究。随着AOA和ACGME的合并,这个话题对对抗疗法和整骨疗法的申请人都至关重要。本研究的目的是评估骨科住院医师项目的住院医师选择标准。方法:于2017年12月向所有骨科骨科项目发送25个问题的调查问卷。然后将最重要的选择因素计算为所有回答的平均值,并相应地进行排序。结果:41位项目主管中有29位(71%)完成了调查。在选择住院医师时,最重要的因素是学生在项目轮转期间的表现,面试中的礼节/礼貌和表现,以及医学院董事会考试成绩。结论:本研究是迄今为止关于骨科住院医师选择过程最全面的研究。本研究的结果将有助于未来的申请人,无论是MD还是DO,关注住院医师选择的因素。结果也可以帮助项目评估他们自己的选择过程并做出改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Osteopathic Orthopaedic Residency Selection Criteria: Program Directors' Survey and Analysis.

Context: Orthopaedic Surgery has become one of the most competitive specialties. Each year the number of applicants is far greater than the number of available Orthopaedic residency training spots [1,2,3]. With medical schools expanding their class sizes and new medical schools opening out of proportion to the number of residency spots, the competition is becoming even more fierce [12]. There are several published articles on resident selection in allopathic orthopaedic programs [5-7]. However, there are currently no such published studies on osteopathic orthopaedic programs to our knowledge. With the AOA and ACGME merger, this topic is critical to both allopathic and osteopathic applicants alike. The goal of our study was to evaluate the resident selection criteria for osteopathic orthopaedic residency programs.

Methods: A twenty-five-question survey was sent to all of the osteopathic orthopaedic programs in December of 2017. The most important selection factors were then calculated as a mean of all the responses and were ranked accordingly.

Results: The survey was completed by 29 out of 41 program directors (71%). The most important factors in resident selection were performance during the student's rotation at the program, formality/politeness and performance in the interview, and medical school board exam scores.

Conclusions: This study is the most comprehensive study to date on the osteopathic orthopaedic resident selection process. The results from this study will help future applicants, both MD and DO, to focus on the factors in resident selection. The results may also help programs evaluate their own selection process and make improvements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Porosities of 3D Printed Titanium Implants on the Tensile Properties: Correspondence. Clinical predictors of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: A healthcare system analysis. Bridging Innovation and Clinical Insights: Reflections on Healthcare Research and Emergency Medicine. Corticosteroid Prescribing Patterns in the Emergency Department for Acute COPD Exacerbations: A Retrospective Analysis Following an Educational Intervention. A Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project in a Community Based Hospital Emergency Department - The Benefits of Simplified Plan-Do-Study-Act/Patient-Safety Quality Improvement Projects Regardless of Staffing Levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1