资助和新冠肺炎研究优先事项-非洲的研究需求是否得到满足?

Q2 Multidisciplinary AAS Open Research Pub Date : 2020-11-24 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.12688/aasopenres.13162.1
Emilia Antonio, Moses Alobo, Marta Tufet Bayona, Kevin Marsh, Alice Norton
{"title":"资助和新冠肺炎研究优先事项-非洲的研究需求是否得到满足?","authors":"Emilia Antonio,&nbsp;Moses Alobo,&nbsp;Marta Tufet Bayona,&nbsp;Kevin Marsh,&nbsp;Alice Norton","doi":"10.12688/aasopenres.13162.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Emerging data from Africa indicates remarkably low numbers of reported COVID-19 deaths despite high levels of disease transmission. However, evolution of these trends as the pandemic progresses remains unknown. More certain are the devastating long-term impacts of the pandemic on health and development evident globally. Research tailored to the unique needs of African countries is crucial. UKCDR and GloPID-R have launched a tracker of funded COVID-19 projects mapped to the WHO research priorities and research priorities of Africa and less-resourced countries and published a baseline analysis of a living systematic review (LSR) of these projects.  <b>Methods</b>: In-depth analyses of the baseline LSR for COVID-19 funded research projects in Africa (as of 15th July 2020) to determine the funding landscape and alignment of the projects to research priorities of relevance to Africa.  <b>Results</b>: The limited COVID-19 related research across Africa appears to be supported mainly by international funding, especially from Europe, although with notably limited funding from United States-based funders. At the time of this analysis no research projects funded by an African-based funder were identified in the tracker although there are several active funding calls geared at research in Africa and there may be funding data that has not been made publicly available. Many projects mapped to the WHO research priorities and five particular gaps in research funding were identified, namely: investigating the role of children in COVID-19 transmission; effective modes of community engagement; health systems research; communication of uncertainties surrounding mother-to-child transmission of COVID-19; and identifying ways to promote international cooperation. Capacity strengthening was identified as a dominant theme in funded research project plans. <b>Conclusions</b>: We found significantly lower funding investments in COVID-19 research in Africa compared to high-income countries, seven months into the pandemic, indicating a paucity of research targeting the research priorities of relevance to Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":34179,"journal":{"name":"AAS Open Research","volume":" ","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927206/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Funding and COVID-19 research priorities - are the research needs for Africa being met?\",\"authors\":\"Emilia Antonio,&nbsp;Moses Alobo,&nbsp;Marta Tufet Bayona,&nbsp;Kevin Marsh,&nbsp;Alice Norton\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/aasopenres.13162.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Emerging data from Africa indicates remarkably low numbers of reported COVID-19 deaths despite high levels of disease transmission. However, evolution of these trends as the pandemic progresses remains unknown. More certain are the devastating long-term impacts of the pandemic on health and development evident globally. Research tailored to the unique needs of African countries is crucial. UKCDR and GloPID-R have launched a tracker of funded COVID-19 projects mapped to the WHO research priorities and research priorities of Africa and less-resourced countries and published a baseline analysis of a living systematic review (LSR) of these projects.  <b>Methods</b>: In-depth analyses of the baseline LSR for COVID-19 funded research projects in Africa (as of 15th July 2020) to determine the funding landscape and alignment of the projects to research priorities of relevance to Africa.  <b>Results</b>: The limited COVID-19 related research across Africa appears to be supported mainly by international funding, especially from Europe, although with notably limited funding from United States-based funders. At the time of this analysis no research projects funded by an African-based funder were identified in the tracker although there are several active funding calls geared at research in Africa and there may be funding data that has not been made publicly available. Many projects mapped to the WHO research priorities and five particular gaps in research funding were identified, namely: investigating the role of children in COVID-19 transmission; effective modes of community engagement; health systems research; communication of uncertainties surrounding mother-to-child transmission of COVID-19; and identifying ways to promote international cooperation. Capacity strengthening was identified as a dominant theme in funded research project plans. <b>Conclusions</b>: We found significantly lower funding investments in COVID-19 research in Africa compared to high-income countries, seven months into the pandemic, indicating a paucity of research targeting the research priorities of relevance to Africa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAS Open Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7927206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAS Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13162.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAS Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13162.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:来自非洲的新数据表明,尽管疾病传播水平很高,但报告的新冠肺炎死亡人数却非常低。然而,随着疫情的发展,这些趋势的演变仍然未知。更可以肯定的是,这一流行病对全球健康和发展的长期破坏性影响显而易见。针对非洲国家独特需求进行的研究至关重要。UKCDR和GloPID-R启动了一个跟踪新冠肺炎资助项目,该项目与世界卫生组织研究优先事项和非洲和资源较少国家的研究优先事项相匹配,并发表了对这些项目的活系统审查(LSR)的基线分析。方法:对新冠肺炎资助的非洲研究项目(截至2020年7月15日)的基线LSR进行深入分析,以确定项目的资助情况和与非洲相关的研究优先事项的一致性。结果:整个非洲有限的新冠肺炎相关研究似乎主要得到国际资金的支持,尤其是来自欧洲的资金,尽管来自美国资助者的资金明显有限。在进行这项分析时,追踪中没有发现由非洲资助者资助的研究项目,尽管有几项针对非洲研究的积极资助呼吁,而且可能有一些资助数据尚未公开。确定了许多与世界卫生组织研究优先事项相关的项目和研究资金方面的五个特殊缺口,即:调查儿童在新冠肺炎传播中的作用;有效的社区参与模式;卫生系统研究;新冠肺炎母婴传播不确定性的沟通;以及确定促进国际合作的途径。在资助的研究项目计划中,能力建设被确定为一个主要主题。结论:与高收入国家相比,在新冠肺炎大流行七个月后,我们发现非洲研究的资金投入显著减少,这表明针对与非洲相关的研究重点的研究很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Funding and COVID-19 research priorities - are the research needs for Africa being met?

Background: Emerging data from Africa indicates remarkably low numbers of reported COVID-19 deaths despite high levels of disease transmission. However, evolution of these trends as the pandemic progresses remains unknown. More certain are the devastating long-term impacts of the pandemic on health and development evident globally. Research tailored to the unique needs of African countries is crucial. UKCDR and GloPID-R have launched a tracker of funded COVID-19 projects mapped to the WHO research priorities and research priorities of Africa and less-resourced countries and published a baseline analysis of a living systematic review (LSR) of these projects.  Methods: In-depth analyses of the baseline LSR for COVID-19 funded research projects in Africa (as of 15th July 2020) to determine the funding landscape and alignment of the projects to research priorities of relevance to Africa.  Results: The limited COVID-19 related research across Africa appears to be supported mainly by international funding, especially from Europe, although with notably limited funding from United States-based funders. At the time of this analysis no research projects funded by an African-based funder were identified in the tracker although there are several active funding calls geared at research in Africa and there may be funding data that has not been made publicly available. Many projects mapped to the WHO research priorities and five particular gaps in research funding were identified, namely: investigating the role of children in COVID-19 transmission; effective modes of community engagement; health systems research; communication of uncertainties surrounding mother-to-child transmission of COVID-19; and identifying ways to promote international cooperation. Capacity strengthening was identified as a dominant theme in funded research project plans. Conclusions: We found significantly lower funding investments in COVID-19 research in Africa compared to high-income countries, seven months into the pandemic, indicating a paucity of research targeting the research priorities of relevance to Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAS Open Research
AAS Open Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Delays in initiating rabies post-exposure prophylaxis among dog bite victims in Wakiso and Kampala districts, Uganda. Stigma-directed services (Stig2Health) to improve 'linkage to care' for people living with HIV in rural Tanzania: study protocol for a nested pre-post implementation study within the Kilombero and Ulanga Antiretroviral Cohort. Case studies from the experience of early career researchers in East Africa in building community engagement in research. Small area estimation for South African resource distribution and policy impacts during COVID-19 Building community and public engagement in research – the experience of early career researchers in East Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1