Small area estimation for South African resource distribution and policy impacts during COVID-19

Q2 Multidisciplinary AAS Open Research Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.12688/aasopenres.13345.1
T. Ferreira, W. Stone, Emile Vercuil, Marna Lourens, Nolwandle Made, T. Madonsela
{"title":"Small area estimation for South African resource distribution and policy impacts during COVID-19","authors":"T. Ferreira, W. Stone, Emile Vercuil, Marna Lourens, Nolwandle Made, T. Madonsela","doi":"10.12688/aasopenres.13345.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African constitutional social justice commitment and equality duty requires that everyone is treated with equal consideration, but also tilts the scales in favour of the most disadvantaged. This paper explores the challenge of utilising publicly available data to promote social justice in resource distribution and fair access to essential services during crisis regulations, and explores Small Area Estimation (SAE) as a method to overcome some of these data challenges. The paper evaluates the strengths and limitations of the primary South African datasets that were available to inform fiscal and resource relief efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing economic crisis. The potential to use SAE was found to be limited due to data constraints but statistics were generated at a district council level from data statistically representative at national level. This demonstrated stark disparities in hunger, access to medical products and piped water - all critical equality considerations during a pandemic. However, the level of disaggregation achieved with SAE is shown to be ineffective to represent the geographical disparities indicative of the true South African population, where extreme inequalities manifest in much closer proximities. This supports the need for improved statistical tools and more targeted and resolved data gathering efforts, to inform fair, social-impact conscious and equality-congruent regulatory impact, as well as just fiscal relief during crisis. Particularly, this work proposes the development of such tools and repositories outside of crisis times, to facilitate awareness of equality and justice issues during the tensions of national crisis.","PeriodicalId":34179,"journal":{"name":"AAS Open Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAS Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13345.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The South African constitutional social justice commitment and equality duty requires that everyone is treated with equal consideration, but also tilts the scales in favour of the most disadvantaged. This paper explores the challenge of utilising publicly available data to promote social justice in resource distribution and fair access to essential services during crisis regulations, and explores Small Area Estimation (SAE) as a method to overcome some of these data challenges. The paper evaluates the strengths and limitations of the primary South African datasets that were available to inform fiscal and resource relief efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing economic crisis. The potential to use SAE was found to be limited due to data constraints but statistics were generated at a district council level from data statistically representative at national level. This demonstrated stark disparities in hunger, access to medical products and piped water - all critical equality considerations during a pandemic. However, the level of disaggregation achieved with SAE is shown to be ineffective to represent the geographical disparities indicative of the true South African population, where extreme inequalities manifest in much closer proximities. This supports the need for improved statistical tools and more targeted and resolved data gathering efforts, to inform fair, social-impact conscious and equality-congruent regulatory impact, as well as just fiscal relief during crisis. Particularly, this work proposes the development of such tools and repositories outside of crisis times, to facilitate awareness of equality and justice issues during the tensions of national crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎期间南非资源分布和政策影响的小面积估计
南非宪法规定的社会正义承诺和平等义务要求每个人都得到平等考虑,但也使天平向最弱势群体倾斜。本文探讨了在危机监管期间利用公开可用数据促进资源分配和公平获得基本服务的社会正义的挑战,并探讨了小面积估计(SAE)作为克服其中一些数据挑战的方法。该论文评估了南非主要数据集的优势和局限性,这些数据集可用于在新冠肺炎大流行和随后的经济危机期间为财政和资源救济工作提供信息。由于数据限制,使用SAE的潜力有限,但统计数据是在区议会层面根据国家层面具有统计代表性的数据生成的。这表明,在饥饿、获得医疗产品和自来水方面存在着明显的差异——在疫情期间,所有这些都是至关重要的平等考虑因素。然而,SAE实现的分类水平被证明无法代表真实南非人口的地理差异,在南非,极端不平等表现在更接近的地方。这支持了改进统计工具和更有针对性和解决方案的数据收集工作的必要性,以告知公平、有社会影响意识和平等一致的监管影响,以及危机期间的财政救济。特别是,这项工作建议在危机时期之外开发此类工具和存储库,以促进在国家危机紧张时期对平等和正义问题的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AAS Open Research
AAS Open Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Delays in initiating rabies post-exposure prophylaxis among dog bite victims in Wakiso and Kampala districts, Uganda. Stigma-directed services (Stig2Health) to improve 'linkage to care' for people living with HIV in rural Tanzania: study protocol for a nested pre-post implementation study within the Kilombero and Ulanga Antiretroviral Cohort. Case studies from the experience of early career researchers in East Africa in building community engagement in research. Small area estimation for South African resource distribution and policy impacts during COVID-19 Building community and public engagement in research – the experience of early career researchers in East Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1