造口适应量表新分量表的心理计量特性:一项横断面研究

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2021-03-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S300604
Kirsten Lerum Indrebø, Anny Aasprang, Torill Elin Olsen, John Roger Andersen
{"title":"造口适应量表新分量表的心理计量特性:一项横断面研究","authors":"Kirsten Lerum Indrebø, Anny Aasprang, Torill Elin Olsen, John Roger Andersen","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S300604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ostomy Adjustment Scale (OAS), which consists of an overall sum score along with 34 single-item scores, has been frequently used to measure self-reported adjustment to life with an ostomy. However, it is unknown whether the OAS can be divided into meaningful thematic subscales that may make it easier to administer and to apply in a clinical feedback system.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to specify thematic OAS subscales and evaluate their psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 302 patients across Norway having colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy. The OAS items were divided into different subscales by expert nurses and patients based on clinical and theoretical considerations. The overall structural validity of this analysis of the OAS was examined using robust confirmatory factor analysis. We evaluated the overall goodness of fit using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI). Factor loadings from the confirmatory factor analysis were used to calculate composite reliability values for the new OAS scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OAS was divided into seven subscales. The overall structure validity was acceptable with RMSEA = 0.053 (90% CI, 0.045-0.060), CFI = 0.913 and TLI = 0.904. The composite reliability values of all scales were >0.70.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OAS can be divided into seven clinically meaningful subscales with acceptable psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Trial register: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT03841071. Date 18. February 2019 retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/53/prom-12-65.PMC7979334.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of New Subscales of the Ostomy Adjustment Scale: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Lerum Indrebø, Anny Aasprang, Torill Elin Olsen, John Roger Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PROM.S300604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ostomy Adjustment Scale (OAS), which consists of an overall sum score along with 34 single-item scores, has been frequently used to measure self-reported adjustment to life with an ostomy. However, it is unknown whether the OAS can be divided into meaningful thematic subscales that may make it easier to administer and to apply in a clinical feedback system.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to specify thematic OAS subscales and evaluate their psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 302 patients across Norway having colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy. The OAS items were divided into different subscales by expert nurses and patients based on clinical and theoretical considerations. The overall structural validity of this analysis of the OAS was examined using robust confirmatory factor analysis. We evaluated the overall goodness of fit using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI). Factor loadings from the confirmatory factor analysis were used to calculate composite reliability values for the new OAS scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OAS was divided into seven subscales. The overall structure validity was acceptable with RMSEA = 0.053 (90% CI, 0.045-0.060), CFI = 0.913 and TLI = 0.904. The composite reliability values of all scales were >0.70.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OAS can be divided into seven clinically meaningful subscales with acceptable psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Trial register: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT03841071. Date 18. February 2019 retrospectively registered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/53/prom-12-65.PMC7979334.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S300604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S300604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:造口适应量表(OAS)由一个总分和 34 个单项得分组成,常用于测量自我报告的造口生活适应情况。目的:本研究的目的是确定 OAS 的主题分量表并评估其心理测量特性:这项横断面研究的对象是挪威各地的302名结肠造口术、回肠造口术或尿路造口术患者。专家护士和患者根据临床和理论考虑将 OAS 项目划分为不同的子量表。我们使用稳健的确认性因子分析对 OAS 分析的整体结构有效性进行了检验。我们使用均方根近似误差(RMSEA)、比较拟合指数(CFI)和塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)评估了整体拟合优度。确认性因子分析得出的因子载荷用于计算新 OAS 量表的综合信度值:结果:OAS 被分为七个子量表。总体结构效度是可以接受的,RMSEA=0.053(90% CI,0.045-0.060),CFI=0.913,TLI=0.904。所有量表的综合信度值均大于 0.70:结论:OAS可分为七个具有临床意义的子量表,其心理测量学特性可以接受:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT03841071:NCT03841071.日期 18.2019年2月回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Properties of New Subscales of the Ostomy Adjustment Scale: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: The Ostomy Adjustment Scale (OAS), which consists of an overall sum score along with 34 single-item scores, has been frequently used to measure self-reported adjustment to life with an ostomy. However, it is unknown whether the OAS can be divided into meaningful thematic subscales that may make it easier to administer and to apply in a clinical feedback system.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to specify thematic OAS subscales and evaluate their psychometric properties.

Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 302 patients across Norway having colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy. The OAS items were divided into different subscales by expert nurses and patients based on clinical and theoretical considerations. The overall structural validity of this analysis of the OAS was examined using robust confirmatory factor analysis. We evaluated the overall goodness of fit using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI). Factor loadings from the confirmatory factor analysis were used to calculate composite reliability values for the new OAS scales.

Results: The OAS was divided into seven subscales. The overall structure validity was acceptable with RMSEA = 0.053 (90% CI, 0.045-0.060), CFI = 0.913 and TLI = 0.904. The composite reliability values of all scales were >0.70.

Conclusions: The OAS can be divided into seven clinically meaningful subscales with acceptable psychometric properties.

Trial register: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT03841071. Date 18. February 2019 retrospectively registered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultra-Low Frequency Transmitted Ultrasound Breast Imaging vs DBT (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis): A Patient-Reported Outcome Study. Systematic Literature Review of Studies Reporting Measures of Functional Outcome or Quality of Life in People with Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia. Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Sinhala Translation of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI). Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD PCORI-Funded Research Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics and Determinants of Unsuccessful Treatment Outcomes Among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients: A 5-Year Registry-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1