Claus Lamm, Florian Ph.S. Fischmeister, Herbert Bauer
{"title":"用慢皮质电位和LORETA评估视觉空间加工过程中大脑活动的个体差异","authors":"Claus Lamm, Florian Ph.S. Fischmeister, Herbert Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Using slow-cortical potentials (SCPs), Vitouch et al. (International Journal of Psychophysiology 27 (1997) 183–199) demonstrated that subjects with low ability to solve a complex visuo-spatial imagery task show higher activity in occipital, parietal and frontal cortex during task processing than subjects with high ability. This finding has been interpreted in the sense of the so-called “neural efficiency” hypothesis, which assumes that the central nervous system of individuals with higher intellectual abilities is functioning in a more efficient way than the one of individuals with lower abilities. Using a higher spatial resolution of SCP recordings, and by employing the source localization method of LORETA (low-resolution electromagnetic tomography), we investigated this hypothesis by performing an extended replication of Vitouch et al.'s study. SCPs during processing of a visuo-spatial imagery task were recorded in pre-selected subjects with either high or low abilities in solving the imagery task. Topographic and LORETA analyses of SCPs revealed that a distributed network of extrastriate occipital, superior parietal, temporal, medial frontal and prefrontal areas was active during task solving. This network is well in line with former studies of the functional </span>neuroanatomy of visuo-spatial imagery. Contrary to our expectations, however, the results of Vitouch et al. as well as of other studies supporting the neural efficiency hypothesis could not be confirmed since no difference in brain activity between groups was observed. This inconsistency between studies might be due to differing task processing strategies. While subjects with high abilities in the Vitouch et al. study seemed to use a visuo-perceptual task solving approach, all other subjects relied upon a visuo-motor task processing strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 900-912"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.025","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual differences in brain activity during visuo-spatial processing assessed by slow cortical potentials and LORETA\",\"authors\":\"Claus Lamm, Florian Ph.S. Fischmeister, Herbert Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Using slow-cortical potentials (SCPs), Vitouch et al. (International Journal of Psychophysiology 27 (1997) 183–199) demonstrated that subjects with low ability to solve a complex visuo-spatial imagery task show higher activity in occipital, parietal and frontal cortex during task processing than subjects with high ability. This finding has been interpreted in the sense of the so-called “neural efficiency” hypothesis, which assumes that the central nervous system of individuals with higher intellectual abilities is functioning in a more efficient way than the one of individuals with lower abilities. Using a higher spatial resolution of SCP recordings, and by employing the source localization method of LORETA (low-resolution electromagnetic tomography), we investigated this hypothesis by performing an extended replication of Vitouch et al.'s study. SCPs during processing of a visuo-spatial imagery task were recorded in pre-selected subjects with either high or low abilities in solving the imagery task. Topographic and LORETA analyses of SCPs revealed that a distributed network of extrastriate occipital, superior parietal, temporal, medial frontal and prefrontal areas was active during task solving. This network is well in line with former studies of the functional </span>neuroanatomy of visuo-spatial imagery. Contrary to our expectations, however, the results of Vitouch et al. as well as of other studies supporting the neural efficiency hypothesis could not be confirmed since no difference in brain activity between groups was observed. This inconsistency between studies might be due to differing task processing strategies. While subjects with high abilities in the Vitouch et al. study seemed to use a visuo-perceptual task solving approach, all other subjects relied upon a visuo-motor task processing strategy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 900-912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.025\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
摘要
Vitouch等人(International Journal of psychalphysiology 27(1997) 183-199)利用慢皮层电位(scp)证明,解决复杂视觉空间意象任务能力低的受试者在任务处理过程中,其枕叶、顶叶和额叶皮层的活动要高于能力高的受试者。这一发现被解释为所谓的“神经效率”假说,该假说认为,智力较高的人的中枢神经系统比智力较低的人的中枢神经系统更有效地运作。利用SCP记录的更高空间分辨率,并采用LORETA(低分辨率电磁断层扫描)的源定位方法,我们通过对Vitouch等人的研究进行扩展复制来研究这一假设。在处理视觉空间图像任务过程中,记录了预先选择的具有高或低解决图像任务能力的受试者的scp。地形和LORETA分析显示,在任务解决过程中,大脑皮层外枕区、顶叶上区、颞叶区、内侧额叶区和前额叶区分布网络处于活跃状态。这一网络与先前对视觉空间图像的功能神经解剖学的研究非常一致。然而,与我们的预期相反,Vitouch等人的结果以及其他支持神经效率假说的研究结果无法得到证实,因为没有观察到两组之间大脑活动的差异。研究之间的不一致可能是由于不同的任务处理策略。在Vitouch等人的研究中,高能力的受试者似乎使用视觉-知觉任务解决方法,而所有其他受试者都依赖于视觉-运动任务处理策略。
Individual differences in brain activity during visuo-spatial processing assessed by slow cortical potentials and LORETA
Using slow-cortical potentials (SCPs), Vitouch et al. (International Journal of Psychophysiology 27 (1997) 183–199) demonstrated that subjects with low ability to solve a complex visuo-spatial imagery task show higher activity in occipital, parietal and frontal cortex during task processing than subjects with high ability. This finding has been interpreted in the sense of the so-called “neural efficiency” hypothesis, which assumes that the central nervous system of individuals with higher intellectual abilities is functioning in a more efficient way than the one of individuals with lower abilities. Using a higher spatial resolution of SCP recordings, and by employing the source localization method of LORETA (low-resolution electromagnetic tomography), we investigated this hypothesis by performing an extended replication of Vitouch et al.'s study. SCPs during processing of a visuo-spatial imagery task were recorded in pre-selected subjects with either high or low abilities in solving the imagery task. Topographic and LORETA analyses of SCPs revealed that a distributed network of extrastriate occipital, superior parietal, temporal, medial frontal and prefrontal areas was active during task solving. This network is well in line with former studies of the functional neuroanatomy of visuo-spatial imagery. Contrary to our expectations, however, the results of Vitouch et al. as well as of other studies supporting the neural efficiency hypothesis could not be confirmed since no difference in brain activity between groups was observed. This inconsistency between studies might be due to differing task processing strategies. While subjects with high abilities in the Vitouch et al. study seemed to use a visuo-perceptual task solving approach, all other subjects relied upon a visuo-motor task processing strategy.