病人对流动产科及妇科服务的质素评估。

I Bojar, L Wdowiak, T Ostrowski
{"title":"病人对流动产科及妇科服务的质素评估。","authors":"I Bojar,&nbsp;L Wdowiak,&nbsp;T Ostrowski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The quality could be assessed from two perspectives: internal and external. From the internal perspective the quality means being consistent with particular conditions and standards. The external perspective is based on relative assessment of the product made by a client who is also aware of other competitors' offer. Despite the professional assessment which is focused on providing health services according to medical and managerial correctness, patient's assessment is also relevant. Measuring patient's satisfaction is additional method of health services quality assessment. The aim of the study was to estimate patients' opinion on quality of ambulatory obstetric and gynaecological services.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted in 11 obstetric and gynaecological out-patient clinics of Lublin in September and October 2003. The study tool was an author's questionnaire. Patients were asked to assess such areas as registration before visit, their relationship with nurses and gynaecologists and other aspects of services provision like intimacy assurance and respecting Patient's Rights. The collected data was statistically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>635 patients took part in the study. The biggest groups in the studied population were women at the age of 20-30 years, married, living in cities and secondary educated. It was found that around half of the population is satisfied and 2.2% of them are unsatisfied with the fact that they have chosen particular out-patient clinic. More than 70% of women had positive opinion of following aspects influencing general opinion about service quality: politness of reception desk staff, opening hours, the length of time before a patient is seen by the specialist, intimacy assurance and respect for Patient's Rights in the practice. 80% of patients were satisfied with the relationship with nurses and 3.3% were unsatisfied with it. Eight patients out of ten were satisfied with gynaecological care, less than 2% were unsatisfied. The studied women had also high opinion of the course of visit. More than 90% of studied patients trust their gynaecologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More satisfied with the services provided by the obstetric and gynaecological out-patient clinics were women living in cities than in villages and those visiting nonpublic than public practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":79372,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Akademii Medycznej w Bialymstoku (1995)","volume":"50 ","pages":"319-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' quality assessment of ambulatory obstetric and gynaecological services.\",\"authors\":\"I Bojar,&nbsp;L Wdowiak,&nbsp;T Ostrowski\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The quality could be assessed from two perspectives: internal and external. From the internal perspective the quality means being consistent with particular conditions and standards. The external perspective is based on relative assessment of the product made by a client who is also aware of other competitors' offer. Despite the professional assessment which is focused on providing health services according to medical and managerial correctness, patient's assessment is also relevant. Measuring patient's satisfaction is additional method of health services quality assessment. The aim of the study was to estimate patients' opinion on quality of ambulatory obstetric and gynaecological services.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted in 11 obstetric and gynaecological out-patient clinics of Lublin in September and October 2003. The study tool was an author's questionnaire. Patients were asked to assess such areas as registration before visit, their relationship with nurses and gynaecologists and other aspects of services provision like intimacy assurance and respecting Patient's Rights. The collected data was statistically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>635 patients took part in the study. The biggest groups in the studied population were women at the age of 20-30 years, married, living in cities and secondary educated. It was found that around half of the population is satisfied and 2.2% of them are unsatisfied with the fact that they have chosen particular out-patient clinic. More than 70% of women had positive opinion of following aspects influencing general opinion about service quality: politness of reception desk staff, opening hours, the length of time before a patient is seen by the specialist, intimacy assurance and respect for Patient's Rights in the practice. 80% of patients were satisfied with the relationship with nurses and 3.3% were unsatisfied with it. Eight patients out of ten were satisfied with gynaecological care, less than 2% were unsatisfied. The studied women had also high opinion of the course of visit. More than 90% of studied patients trust their gynaecologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More satisfied with the services provided by the obstetric and gynaecological out-patient clinics were women living in cities than in villages and those visiting nonpublic than public practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roczniki Akademii Medycznej w Bialymstoku (1995)\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"319-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roczniki Akademii Medycznej w Bialymstoku (1995)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Akademii Medycznej w Bialymstoku (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从内部和外部两个角度评价质量。从内部来看,质量意味着符合特定的条件和标准。外部视角是基于客户对产品的相对评估,客户也知道其他竞争对手的报价。尽管专业评估的重点是根据医疗和管理的正确性提供保健服务,但患者的评估也是相关的。测量患者满意度是卫生服务质量评估的另一种方法。该研究的目的是估计患者对门诊产科和妇科服务质量的意见。材料和方法:研究于2003年9月和10月在卢布林的11个产科和妇科门诊诊所进行。研究工具是作者的问卷调查。患者被要求评估诸如就诊前的登记,他们与护士和妇科医生的关系以及服务提供的其他方面,如亲密保证和尊重患者权利。对收集到的数据进行统计分析。结果:635例患者参与了研究。研究人群中最大的群体是年龄在20-30岁之间、已婚、居住在城市、受过中等教育的女性。调查发现,约有一半的人满意,2.2%的人不满意他们选择了特定的门诊诊所。超过70%的女性对影响对服务质量的总体看法的以下方面持积极看法:前台工作人员的礼貌、开放时间、患者就诊前的时间长度、亲密关系的保证以及在实践中尊重患者的权利。80%的患者对护理关系满意,3.3%的患者对护理关系不满意。8 / 10的患者对妇科护理满意,不到2%的患者不满意。被研究的女性对访问过程也有很高的评价。超过90%的被调查患者信任他们的妇科医生。结论:城市妇女对门诊服务的满意度高于农村妇女,非公立门诊妇女对门诊服务的满意度高于公立门诊妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients' quality assessment of ambulatory obstetric and gynaecological services.

Purpose: The quality could be assessed from two perspectives: internal and external. From the internal perspective the quality means being consistent with particular conditions and standards. The external perspective is based on relative assessment of the product made by a client who is also aware of other competitors' offer. Despite the professional assessment which is focused on providing health services according to medical and managerial correctness, patient's assessment is also relevant. Measuring patient's satisfaction is additional method of health services quality assessment. The aim of the study was to estimate patients' opinion on quality of ambulatory obstetric and gynaecological services.

Material and methods: The study was conducted in 11 obstetric and gynaecological out-patient clinics of Lublin in September and October 2003. The study tool was an author's questionnaire. Patients were asked to assess such areas as registration before visit, their relationship with nurses and gynaecologists and other aspects of services provision like intimacy assurance and respecting Patient's Rights. The collected data was statistically analysed.

Results: 635 patients took part in the study. The biggest groups in the studied population were women at the age of 20-30 years, married, living in cities and secondary educated. It was found that around half of the population is satisfied and 2.2% of them are unsatisfied with the fact that they have chosen particular out-patient clinic. More than 70% of women had positive opinion of following aspects influencing general opinion about service quality: politness of reception desk staff, opening hours, the length of time before a patient is seen by the specialist, intimacy assurance and respect for Patient's Rights in the practice. 80% of patients were satisfied with the relationship with nurses and 3.3% were unsatisfied with it. Eight patients out of ten were satisfied with gynaecological care, less than 2% were unsatisfied. The studied women had also high opinion of the course of visit. More than 90% of studied patients trust their gynaecologists.

Conclusions: More satisfied with the services provided by the obstetric and gynaecological out-patient clinics were women living in cities than in villages and those visiting nonpublic than public practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The cortical evoked potentials in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Neuroprotection possibilities in epileptic children. New antiepileptic drugs--an overview. Youth's knowledge and attitude to epilepsy. Community nursing care of the elderly during transformation of the primary health care system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1