Tahziba Hussain, Shikha Sinha, K K Kulshreshtha, Kiran Katoch, V S Yadav, U Sengupta, V M Katoch
{"title":"印度阿格拉麻风患者中艾滋病毒感染的血清流行率:趋势和前景。","authors":"Tahziba Hussain, Shikha Sinha, K K Kulshreshtha, Kiran Katoch, V S Yadav, U Sengupta, V M Katoch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares the results of HIV seroprevalence, which was carried out in two phases, i.e., 1989 to 1993 and 1999 to 2004. Although the number of leprosy patients screened for HIV infection in the second phase is less (2125) as compared to those screened during the first phase (4025), a rise in HIV infection from 0.12% to 0.37% is certainly disturbing since this area appears to be endemic for both the infections. During the study period, the Out Patient department attendance of a few types of leprosy patients like borderline and borderline lepromatous have risen, whereas others like borderline tuberculoid and polar tuberculoid have declined in the second phase as compared to that of the first phase. The trend over a decade suggests that HIV infection is low among the leprosy patients when compared with other risk groups. Follow-up of these patients at an interval of six months, revealed that none of them downgraded into a severe form of leprosy nor developed ARC or AIDS. In this study, it appears that neither infection precipitated the other. The occurrence of downgradation as well as reversal reactions and neuritis (both chronic and acute) was not observed among the leprosy patients. None of them developed erythema nodosum leprosum reactions. Similarly, the HIV-positive leprosy cases did not develop either AIDS related complex (ARC) or full blown case of AIDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14078,"journal":{"name":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","volume":"73 2","pages":"93-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seroprevalence of HIV infection among leprosy patients in Agra, India: trends and perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Tahziba Hussain, Shikha Sinha, K K Kulshreshtha, Kiran Katoch, V S Yadav, U Sengupta, V M Katoch\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compares the results of HIV seroprevalence, which was carried out in two phases, i.e., 1989 to 1993 and 1999 to 2004. Although the number of leprosy patients screened for HIV infection in the second phase is less (2125) as compared to those screened during the first phase (4025), a rise in HIV infection from 0.12% to 0.37% is certainly disturbing since this area appears to be endemic for both the infections. During the study period, the Out Patient department attendance of a few types of leprosy patients like borderline and borderline lepromatous have risen, whereas others like borderline tuberculoid and polar tuberculoid have declined in the second phase as compared to that of the first phase. The trend over a decade suggests that HIV infection is low among the leprosy patients when compared with other risk groups. Follow-up of these patients at an interval of six months, revealed that none of them downgraded into a severe form of leprosy nor developed ARC or AIDS. In this study, it appears that neither infection precipitated the other. The occurrence of downgradation as well as reversal reactions and neuritis (both chronic and acute) was not observed among the leprosy patients. None of them developed erythema nodosum leprosum reactions. Similarly, the HIV-positive leprosy cases did not develop either AIDS related complex (ARC) or full blown case of AIDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association\",\"volume\":\"73 2\",\"pages\":\"93-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Seroprevalence of HIV infection among leprosy patients in Agra, India: trends and perspective.
This study compares the results of HIV seroprevalence, which was carried out in two phases, i.e., 1989 to 1993 and 1999 to 2004. Although the number of leprosy patients screened for HIV infection in the second phase is less (2125) as compared to those screened during the first phase (4025), a rise in HIV infection from 0.12% to 0.37% is certainly disturbing since this area appears to be endemic for both the infections. During the study period, the Out Patient department attendance of a few types of leprosy patients like borderline and borderline lepromatous have risen, whereas others like borderline tuberculoid and polar tuberculoid have declined in the second phase as compared to that of the first phase. The trend over a decade suggests that HIV infection is low among the leprosy patients when compared with other risk groups. Follow-up of these patients at an interval of six months, revealed that none of them downgraded into a severe form of leprosy nor developed ARC or AIDS. In this study, it appears that neither infection precipitated the other. The occurrence of downgradation as well as reversal reactions and neuritis (both chronic and acute) was not observed among the leprosy patients. None of them developed erythema nodosum leprosum reactions. Similarly, the HIV-positive leprosy cases did not develop either AIDS related complex (ARC) or full blown case of AIDS.