Ali Rasoolzadeh , Ali Bakhtyari , Khayyam Mehrabi , Jafar Javanmardi , Khashayar Nasrifar , Amir H. Mohammadi
{"title":"在气体脱水、增甜和其他含氮添加剂的情况下,用预测热力学方法测定笼形物水合物的解离条件","authors":"Ali Rasoolzadeh , Ali Bakhtyari , Khayyam Mehrabi , Jafar Javanmardi , Khashayar Nasrifar , Amir H. Mohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>–Despite numerous experimental data on gas hydrate<span><span> equilibrium conditions in the presence of glycols, alkanolamines, and nitrogenated additives that are frequently utilized in the gas refinery, the apparent lack of a precise predictive thermodynamic model is still perceived. This study presents an unprecedented </span>thermodynamic framework benefitting from the modified van der Waals-Platteeuw (vdW-P) model for the hydrate phase, the Peng-Robinson </span></span>equation of state<span> (PR EoS) for the vapor/gas phase, and combinations of free-volume Flory Huggins (FVFH) and Pitzer-Debye-Hückel (PDH) equations for the water activity in the aqueous phase<span>, in which the FVFH activity model is utilized for the additives with molecular interactions solely, while the PDH model is employed when the ionic interactions also exist. When the model assessed a databank of 1075 data points, 0.29% (0.80 K) and 9.67% (0.49 MPa) deviations were observed in the temperature and pressure calculations, respectively. In particular, for 877 data points (glycols, urea, acetamide, and formamide), employing FVFH solely resulted in 0.32% (0.88 K) and 10.54% (0.50 MPa) temperature and pressure deviations, respectively, whereas the combination of FVFH + PDH yielded 0.17% (0.48 K) and 5.81% (0.47 MPa) errors in temperature and pressure estimations, respectively in 198 data points of the systems comprised of amines, hydrazine, and piperazine. The maximum deviation of temperature prediction did not exceed 6.80 K (2.39%). The results reveal the effective performance of the proposed calculation approach.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 104773"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of clathrate hydrates dissociation conditions in the presence of gas dehydration, sweetening, and other nitrogenated additives using a predictive thermodynamic approach\",\"authors\":\"Ali Rasoolzadeh , Ali Bakhtyari , Khayyam Mehrabi , Jafar Javanmardi , Khashayar Nasrifar , Amir H. Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>–Despite numerous experimental data on gas hydrate<span><span> equilibrium conditions in the presence of glycols, alkanolamines, and nitrogenated additives that are frequently utilized in the gas refinery, the apparent lack of a precise predictive thermodynamic model is still perceived. This study presents an unprecedented </span>thermodynamic framework benefitting from the modified van der Waals-Platteeuw (vdW-P) model for the hydrate phase, the Peng-Robinson </span></span>equation of state<span> (PR EoS) for the vapor/gas phase, and combinations of free-volume Flory Huggins (FVFH) and Pitzer-Debye-Hückel (PDH) equations for the water activity in the aqueous phase<span>, in which the FVFH activity model is utilized for the additives with molecular interactions solely, while the PDH model is employed when the ionic interactions also exist. When the model assessed a databank of 1075 data points, 0.29% (0.80 K) and 9.67% (0.49 MPa) deviations were observed in the temperature and pressure calculations, respectively. In particular, for 877 data points (glycols, urea, acetamide, and formamide), employing FVFH solely resulted in 0.32% (0.88 K) and 10.54% (0.50 MPa) temperature and pressure deviations, respectively, whereas the combination of FVFH + PDH yielded 0.17% (0.48 K) and 5.81% (0.47 MPa) errors in temperature and pressure estimations, respectively in 198 data points of the systems comprised of amines, hydrazine, and piperazine. The maximum deviation of temperature prediction did not exceed 6.80 K (2.39%). The results reveal the effective performance of the proposed calculation approach.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003596\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of clathrate hydrates dissociation conditions in the presence of gas dehydration, sweetening, and other nitrogenated additives using a predictive thermodynamic approach
–Despite numerous experimental data on gas hydrate equilibrium conditions in the presence of glycols, alkanolamines, and nitrogenated additives that are frequently utilized in the gas refinery, the apparent lack of a precise predictive thermodynamic model is still perceived. This study presents an unprecedented thermodynamic framework benefitting from the modified van der Waals-Platteeuw (vdW-P) model for the hydrate phase, the Peng-Robinson equation of state (PR EoS) for the vapor/gas phase, and combinations of free-volume Flory Huggins (FVFH) and Pitzer-Debye-Hückel (PDH) equations for the water activity in the aqueous phase, in which the FVFH activity model is utilized for the additives with molecular interactions solely, while the PDH model is employed when the ionic interactions also exist. When the model assessed a databank of 1075 data points, 0.29% (0.80 K) and 9.67% (0.49 MPa) deviations were observed in the temperature and pressure calculations, respectively. In particular, for 877 data points (glycols, urea, acetamide, and formamide), employing FVFH solely resulted in 0.32% (0.88 K) and 10.54% (0.50 MPa) temperature and pressure deviations, respectively, whereas the combination of FVFH + PDH yielded 0.17% (0.48 K) and 5.81% (0.47 MPa) errors in temperature and pressure estimations, respectively in 198 data points of the systems comprised of amines, hydrazine, and piperazine. The maximum deviation of temperature prediction did not exceed 6.80 K (2.39%). The results reveal the effective performance of the proposed calculation approach.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.