{"title":"发表临床试验结果:未来在召唤。","authors":"Elizabeth Wager","doi":"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elizabeth WagerSearch for the truth is the noblestoccupation of man; its publication is aduty. —Madame de Stael (1766–1817)Formats for reporting results fromrandomized clinical trials in peer-re-viewed journals have remained virtuallyunchanged and unchallenged for thepast 50 years [1]. However, a number ofdevelopments, some technological andsome political, provide exciting oppor-tunities to question whether we areusing the most efficient and effectivemethods of publication. Here, I suggesthow methods of reporting clinical trialscould be improved and consider theimplications for trial sponsors andmedical journals.","PeriodicalId":87416,"journal":{"name":"PLoS clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010031","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publishing clinical trial results: the future beckons.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Wager\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pctr.0010031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Elizabeth WagerSearch for the truth is the noblestoccupation of man; its publication is aduty. —Madame de Stael (1766–1817)Formats for reporting results fromrandomized clinical trials in peer-re-viewed journals have remained virtuallyunchanged and unchallenged for thepast 50 years [1]. However, a number ofdevelopments, some technological andsome political, provide exciting oppor-tunities to question whether we areusing the most efficient and effectivemethods of publication. Here, I suggesthow methods of reporting clinical trialscould be improved and consider theimplications for trial sponsors andmedical journals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS clinical trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010031\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Publishing clinical trial results: the future beckons.
Elizabeth WagerSearch for the truth is the noblestoccupation of man; its publication is aduty. —Madame de Stael (1766–1817)Formats for reporting results fromrandomized clinical trials in peer-re-viewed journals have remained virtuallyunchanged and unchallenged for thepast 50 years [1]. However, a number ofdevelopments, some technological andsome political, provide exciting oppor-tunities to question whether we areusing the most efficient and effectivemethods of publication. Here, I suggesthow methods of reporting clinical trialscould be improved and consider theimplications for trial sponsors andmedical journals.