吸入气溶胶平面成像三维恢复分析技术:(1)对空间定量化的影响。

Livia Tossici-Bolt, John S Fleming, Joy H Conway, Theodore B Martonen
{"title":"吸入气溶胶平面成像三维恢复分析技术:(1)对空间定量化的影响。","authors":"Livia Tossici-Bolt,&nbsp;John S Fleming,&nbsp;Joy H Conway,&nbsp;Theodore B Martonen","doi":"10.1089/jam.2006.19.565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An analytical algorithm is described for converting planar scintigraphic images of aerosol distributions in the lungs to an equivalent three-dimensional (3D) representation. The recovery of volumetric information should benefit regional quantification. The technique has been validated using simulated planar images of eleven known aerosol distributions in ten realistic lungs. Global and regional 3D parameters, such as the total activity deposition (A), the penetration index (PI) and the relative penetration index (rPI), were quantified on the planar images and on their 3D representation. Random and systematic errors of the estimation were measured. Finally, the performance of planar imaging was compared with that of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). SPECT images were simulated for the same aerosol distributions in the same subjects and quantified for A, PI, and rPI. The systematic errors in A, PI and rPI obtained from planar imaging were 8.9%, 64.8%, and 54.1%, respectively, using the two-dimensional (2D) analysis; they improved significantly to 4.4%, 19.0%, and 25.5% with the 3D analysis (p < 0.01). The corresponding values for SPECT were 5.2%, 9.8%, and 15.7%, significantly better for PI and rPI (p < 0.01). The random errors of A were similar for all techniques being about 5%; those of PI and rPI measurements were significantly higher for planar imaging (<or=14%) than SPECT (<or=8%). In conclusion, 3D spatial parameters can be derived from planar imaging that are significantly more accurate in characterizing different aerosol depositions than their 2D counterpart. However, the errors remain significantly higher than with SPECT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","volume":"19 4","pages":"565-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jam.2006.19.565","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical technique to recover the third dimension in planar imaging of inhaled aerosols: (1) impact on spatial quantification.\",\"authors\":\"Livia Tossici-Bolt,&nbsp;John S Fleming,&nbsp;Joy H Conway,&nbsp;Theodore B Martonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jam.2006.19.565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An analytical algorithm is described for converting planar scintigraphic images of aerosol distributions in the lungs to an equivalent three-dimensional (3D) representation. The recovery of volumetric information should benefit regional quantification. The technique has been validated using simulated planar images of eleven known aerosol distributions in ten realistic lungs. Global and regional 3D parameters, such as the total activity deposition (A), the penetration index (PI) and the relative penetration index (rPI), were quantified on the planar images and on their 3D representation. Random and systematic errors of the estimation were measured. Finally, the performance of planar imaging was compared with that of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). SPECT images were simulated for the same aerosol distributions in the same subjects and quantified for A, PI, and rPI. The systematic errors in A, PI and rPI obtained from planar imaging were 8.9%, 64.8%, and 54.1%, respectively, using the two-dimensional (2D) analysis; they improved significantly to 4.4%, 19.0%, and 25.5% with the 3D analysis (p < 0.01). The corresponding values for SPECT were 5.2%, 9.8%, and 15.7%, significantly better for PI and rPI (p < 0.01). The random errors of A were similar for all techniques being about 5%; those of PI and rPI measurements were significantly higher for planar imaging (<or=14%) than SPECT (<or=8%). In conclusion, 3D spatial parameters can be derived from planar imaging that are significantly more accurate in characterizing different aerosol depositions than their 2D counterpart. However, the errors remain significantly higher than with SPECT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"565-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/jam.2006.19.565\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2006.19.565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2006.19.565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

描述了一种解析算法,用于将肺部气溶胶分布的平面闪烁图像转换为等效的三维(3D)表示。体积信息的恢复应该有利于区域量化。该技术已通过在10个真实肺中模拟11个已知气溶胶分布的平面图像进行了验证。在平面图像及其三维表示上量化了总体和区域三维参数,如总活性沉积(A)、穿透指数(PI)和相对穿透指数(rPI)。测量了估计的随机误差和系统误差。最后,比较了平面成像与单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的成像性能。对相同受试者的相同气溶胶分布进行SPECT图像模拟,并对A、PI和rPI进行量化。平面成像A、PI和rPI的系统误差分别为8.9%、64.8%和54.1%;3D分析后分别为4.4%、19.0%和25.5%,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。SPECT的相应值分别为5.2%、9.8%和15.7%,PI和rPI的相应值显著高于前者(p < 0.01)。所有技术A的随机误差相似,约为5%;平面成像的PI和rPI测量值显著高于平面成像(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analytical technique to recover the third dimension in planar imaging of inhaled aerosols: (1) impact on spatial quantification.

An analytical algorithm is described for converting planar scintigraphic images of aerosol distributions in the lungs to an equivalent three-dimensional (3D) representation. The recovery of volumetric information should benefit regional quantification. The technique has been validated using simulated planar images of eleven known aerosol distributions in ten realistic lungs. Global and regional 3D parameters, such as the total activity deposition (A), the penetration index (PI) and the relative penetration index (rPI), were quantified on the planar images and on their 3D representation. Random and systematic errors of the estimation were measured. Finally, the performance of planar imaging was compared with that of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). SPECT images were simulated for the same aerosol distributions in the same subjects and quantified for A, PI, and rPI. The systematic errors in A, PI and rPI obtained from planar imaging were 8.9%, 64.8%, and 54.1%, respectively, using the two-dimensional (2D) analysis; they improved significantly to 4.4%, 19.0%, and 25.5% with the 3D analysis (p < 0.01). The corresponding values for SPECT were 5.2%, 9.8%, and 15.7%, significantly better for PI and rPI (p < 0.01). The random errors of A were similar for all techniques being about 5%; those of PI and rPI measurements were significantly higher for planar imaging (

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formoterol turbuhaler is as effective as salbutamol diskus in relieving adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in children. An in vitro study to assess facial and ocular deposition from Respimat Soft Mist inhaler. Exhaled breath condensate pH is increased after moderate exercise. The analysis and prediction of functional robustness of inhaler devices. Comparison of the Diskus inhaler and the Handihaler regarding preference and ease of use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1