Pekka Rapeli, Carola Fabritius, Hannu Alho, Mikko Salaspuro, Kristian Wahlbeck, Hely Kalska
{"title":"早期阿片类药物替代治疗期间美沙酮与丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮:相对于健康对照的认知表现的自然比较","authors":"Pekka Rapeli, Carola Fabritius, Hannu Alho, Mikko Salaspuro, Kristian Wahlbeck, Hely Kalska","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-7-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both methadone- and buprenorphine-treated opioid-dependent patients frequently show cognitive deficits in attention, working memory, and verbal memory. However, no study has compared these patient groups with each other during early opioid substitution treatment (OST). Therefore, we investigated attention, working memory, and verbal memory of opioid-dependent patients within six weeks after the introduction of OST in a naturalistic setting and compared to those of healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 16 methadone-, 17 buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients, and 17 healthy controls matched for sex and age. In both groups buprenorphine was the main opioid of abuse during the recent month. Benzodiazepine codependence, recent use, and comedication were also common in both patient groups. Analysis of variance was used to study the overall group effect in each cognitive test. Pair-wise group comparisons were made, when appropriate</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Methadone-treated patients, as a group, had significantly slower simple reaction time (RT) compared to buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients. In Go/NoGo RT methadone patients were significantly slower than controls. Both patient groups were significantly debilitated compared to controls in working memory and verbal list learning. Only methadone patients were inferior to controls in story recall. In simple RT and delayed story recall buprenorphine/naloxone patients with current benzodiazepine medication (n = 13) were superior to methadone patients with current benzodiazepine medication (n = 13). When methadone patients were divided into two groups according to their mean dose, the patient group with a low dose (mean 40 mg, n = 8) showed significantly faster simple RT than the high dose group (mean 67 mg, n = 8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deficits in attention may only be present in methadone-treated early phase OST patients and may be dose-dependent. Working memory deficit is common in both patient groups. Verbal memory deficit may be more pronounced in methadone-treated patients than in buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients. In sum, to preserve cognitive function in early OST, the use of buprenorphine/naloxone may be more preferable to methadone use of, at least if buprenorphine has been recently abused and when benzodiazepine comedication is used. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate if the better performance of buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients is a relatively permanent effect or reflects \"only\" transient opioid switching effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"7 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-7-5","citationCount":"107","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methadone vs. buprenorphine/naloxone during early opioid substitution treatment: a naturalistic comparison of cognitive performance relative to healthy controls.\",\"authors\":\"Pekka Rapeli, Carola Fabritius, Hannu Alho, Mikko Salaspuro, Kristian Wahlbeck, Hely Kalska\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1472-6904-7-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both methadone- and buprenorphine-treated opioid-dependent patients frequently show cognitive deficits in attention, working memory, and verbal memory. However, no study has compared these patient groups with each other during early opioid substitution treatment (OST). Therefore, we investigated attention, working memory, and verbal memory of opioid-dependent patients within six weeks after the introduction of OST in a naturalistic setting and compared to those of healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 16 methadone-, 17 buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients, and 17 healthy controls matched for sex and age. In both groups buprenorphine was the main opioid of abuse during the recent month. Benzodiazepine codependence, recent use, and comedication were also common in both patient groups. Analysis of variance was used to study the overall group effect in each cognitive test. Pair-wise group comparisons were made, when appropriate</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Methadone-treated patients, as a group, had significantly slower simple reaction time (RT) compared to buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients. In Go/NoGo RT methadone patients were significantly slower than controls. Both patient groups were significantly debilitated compared to controls in working memory and verbal list learning. Only methadone patients were inferior to controls in story recall. In simple RT and delayed story recall buprenorphine/naloxone patients with current benzodiazepine medication (n = 13) were superior to methadone patients with current benzodiazepine medication (n = 13). When methadone patients were divided into two groups according to their mean dose, the patient group with a low dose (mean 40 mg, n = 8) showed significantly faster simple RT than the high dose group (mean 67 mg, n = 8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deficits in attention may only be present in methadone-treated early phase OST patients and may be dose-dependent. Working memory deficit is common in both patient groups. Verbal memory deficit may be more pronounced in methadone-treated patients than in buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients. In sum, to preserve cognitive function in early OST, the use of buprenorphine/naloxone may be more preferable to methadone use of, at least if buprenorphine has been recently abused and when benzodiazepine comedication is used. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate if the better performance of buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients is a relatively permanent effect or reflects \\\"only\\\" transient opioid switching effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-7-5\",\"citationCount\":\"107\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-7-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-7-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 107
摘要
背景:美沙酮和丁丙诺啡治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者经常在注意力、工作记忆和言语记忆方面表现出认知缺陷。然而,没有研究将这些患者组在早期阿片类药物替代治疗(OST)中进行比较。因此,我们调查了在自然环境中引入OST后六周内阿片类药物依赖患者的注意力、工作记忆和言语记忆,并与健康对照组进行了比较。方法:选取美沙酮组16例,丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮组17例,性别、年龄相匹配的健康对照17例。在两组中,丁丙诺啡是最近一个月滥用的主要阿片类药物。苯二氮卓类药物相互依赖、近期使用和用药在两组患者中也很常见。采用方差分析研究各认知测试的整体群体效应。适当时进行两两组比较。结果:美沙酮治疗的患者作为一个组,与丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗的患者相比,其简单反应时间(RT)明显较慢。在Go/NoGo RT中,美沙酮患者明显慢于对照组。与对照组相比,两组患者在工作记忆和语言列表学习方面都明显衰弱。只有美沙酮患者的故事回忆能力低于对照组。在简单RT和延迟故事回忆中,目前使用苯二氮卓类药物的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮患者(n = 13)优于目前使用苯二氮卓类药物的美沙酮患者(n = 13)。将美沙酮患者按其平均剂量分为两组,低剂量组(平均40 mg, n = 8)的简单RT明显快于高剂量组(平均67 mg, n = 8)。结论:注意缺陷可能只存在于美沙酮治疗的早期OST患者中,并且可能是剂量依赖性的。工作记忆缺陷在两组患者中都很常见。美沙酮治疗患者的言语记忆缺陷可能比丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗患者更为明显。总之,为了保持早期OST的认知功能,使用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮可能比使用美沙酮更优选,至少在最近滥用丁丙诺啡和使用苯二氮卓类药物的情况下是这样。丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗患者的较好表现是一种相对永久性的效果,还是“仅仅”反映了短暂的阿片类药物转换效应,需要进行纵向研究。
Methadone vs. buprenorphine/naloxone during early opioid substitution treatment: a naturalistic comparison of cognitive performance relative to healthy controls.
Background: Both methadone- and buprenorphine-treated opioid-dependent patients frequently show cognitive deficits in attention, working memory, and verbal memory. However, no study has compared these patient groups with each other during early opioid substitution treatment (OST). Therefore, we investigated attention, working memory, and verbal memory of opioid-dependent patients within six weeks after the introduction of OST in a naturalistic setting and compared to those of healthy controls.
Methods: The sample included 16 methadone-, 17 buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients, and 17 healthy controls matched for sex and age. In both groups buprenorphine was the main opioid of abuse during the recent month. Benzodiazepine codependence, recent use, and comedication were also common in both patient groups. Analysis of variance was used to study the overall group effect in each cognitive test. Pair-wise group comparisons were made, when appropriate
Results: Methadone-treated patients, as a group, had significantly slower simple reaction time (RT) compared to buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients. In Go/NoGo RT methadone patients were significantly slower than controls. Both patient groups were significantly debilitated compared to controls in working memory and verbal list learning. Only methadone patients were inferior to controls in story recall. In simple RT and delayed story recall buprenorphine/naloxone patients with current benzodiazepine medication (n = 13) were superior to methadone patients with current benzodiazepine medication (n = 13). When methadone patients were divided into two groups according to their mean dose, the patient group with a low dose (mean 40 mg, n = 8) showed significantly faster simple RT than the high dose group (mean 67 mg, n = 8).
Conclusion: Deficits in attention may only be present in methadone-treated early phase OST patients and may be dose-dependent. Working memory deficit is common in both patient groups. Verbal memory deficit may be more pronounced in methadone-treated patients than in buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients. In sum, to preserve cognitive function in early OST, the use of buprenorphine/naloxone may be more preferable to methadone use of, at least if buprenorphine has been recently abused and when benzodiazepine comedication is used. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate if the better performance of buprenorphine/naloxone-treated patients is a relatively permanent effect or reflects "only" transient opioid switching effect.