规划印度的现代性:生育控制的性别政治。

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Signs Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI:10.1086/495629
N Chatterjee, N E Riley
{"title":"规划印度的现代性:生育控制的性别政治。","authors":"N Chatterjee, N E Riley","doi":"10.1086/495629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a population estimated at over 971 million India is expected to overtake China as the worlds most populous country in the twenty-first century. Notwithstanding the growing debate among social scientists activists and policy makers about linkages between population development and the environment in the public mind India continues to be associated with images of \"teeming\" and \"exploding\" masses mired in human degradation ecological devastation and civil strife. In this context it bears pointing out that the Indian state was the first in the world to initiate an official population control program in 1952. Nearly fifty years later assessments of the Indian family planning programs performance are mixed but the Indian fertility rate is declining despite overall population growth. Our interest in this article is not to argue for or against population control or to evaluate Indias success or failure in this regard but to address Indias state-sponsored population control program-its history ideology and strategies-and to examine the contours of a nationalist modernist project that is by definition gendered and classed and an ongoing product of struggles between multiple actors both beyond and within the state. We argue that Indian family planning intervention which is part of a broad postcolonial developmental agenda represents both an appropriation of and resistance to a hegemonic Western conception of the modern. We analyze the national fertility control programs domestication of modernity through a selective indigenization of modernitys core values noting that at another level this process-the linking of individual and family reproductive behavior to national welfare and the promotion of modernity as embodied practice-is itself an inherently modern project as is the phenomenon of government planning. Furthermore we draw attention to the overtly paternalistic and elitist character of the Indian fertility control program that targets women of all classes and the poor in general. (excerpt)","PeriodicalId":51382,"journal":{"name":"Signs","volume":"26 3","pages":"811-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/495629","citationCount":"81","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning an Indian modernity: the gendered politics of fertility control.\",\"authors\":\"N Chatterjee, N E Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/495629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With a population estimated at over 971 million India is expected to overtake China as the worlds most populous country in the twenty-first century. Notwithstanding the growing debate among social scientists activists and policy makers about linkages between population development and the environment in the public mind India continues to be associated with images of \\\"teeming\\\" and \\\"exploding\\\" masses mired in human degradation ecological devastation and civil strife. In this context it bears pointing out that the Indian state was the first in the world to initiate an official population control program in 1952. Nearly fifty years later assessments of the Indian family planning programs performance are mixed but the Indian fertility rate is declining despite overall population growth. Our interest in this article is not to argue for or against population control or to evaluate Indias success or failure in this regard but to address Indias state-sponsored population control program-its history ideology and strategies-and to examine the contours of a nationalist modernist project that is by definition gendered and classed and an ongoing product of struggles between multiple actors both beyond and within the state. We argue that Indian family planning intervention which is part of a broad postcolonial developmental agenda represents both an appropriation of and resistance to a hegemonic Western conception of the modern. We analyze the national fertility control programs domestication of modernity through a selective indigenization of modernitys core values noting that at another level this process-the linking of individual and family reproductive behavior to national welfare and the promotion of modernity as embodied practice-is itself an inherently modern project as is the phenomenon of government planning. Furthermore we draw attention to the overtly paternalistic and elitist character of the Indian fertility control program that targets women of all classes and the poor in general. (excerpt)\",\"PeriodicalId\":51382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signs\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"811-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/495629\",\"citationCount\":\"81\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/495629\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/495629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Planning an Indian modernity: the gendered politics of fertility control.
With a population estimated at over 971 million India is expected to overtake China as the worlds most populous country in the twenty-first century. Notwithstanding the growing debate among social scientists activists and policy makers about linkages between population development and the environment in the public mind India continues to be associated with images of "teeming" and "exploding" masses mired in human degradation ecological devastation and civil strife. In this context it bears pointing out that the Indian state was the first in the world to initiate an official population control program in 1952. Nearly fifty years later assessments of the Indian family planning programs performance are mixed but the Indian fertility rate is declining despite overall population growth. Our interest in this article is not to argue for or against population control or to evaluate Indias success or failure in this regard but to address Indias state-sponsored population control program-its history ideology and strategies-and to examine the contours of a nationalist modernist project that is by definition gendered and classed and an ongoing product of struggles between multiple actors both beyond and within the state. We argue that Indian family planning intervention which is part of a broad postcolonial developmental agenda represents both an appropriation of and resistance to a hegemonic Western conception of the modern. We analyze the national fertility control programs domestication of modernity through a selective indigenization of modernitys core values noting that at another level this process-the linking of individual and family reproductive behavior to national welfare and the promotion of modernity as embodied practice-is itself an inherently modern project as is the phenomenon of government planning. Furthermore we draw attention to the overtly paternalistic and elitist character of the Indian fertility control program that targets women of all classes and the poor in general. (excerpt)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Signs
Signs WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading international journal in women"s studies, Signs has since 1975 been at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. Signs publishes pathbreaking articles of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and/or sexuality either as central focuses or as constitutive analytics; symposia engaging comparative, interdisciplinary perspectives from around the globe to analyze concepts and topics of import to feminist scholarship; retrospectives that track the growth and development of feminist scholarship, note transformations in key concepts and methodologies, and construct genealogies of feminist inquiry; and new directions essays, which provide an overview of the main themes, controversies.
期刊最新文献
Connective Labor as Emotional Vocabulary: Inequality, Mutuality, and the Politics of Feelings in Care-Work Acuerpar: The Decolonial Feminist Call for Embodied Solidarity About the Contributors Challenging the Antipolitics of Regimes of Care: Young African Men in Italy Resist Precarious Futures Victory or Defeat? The Dilemma of Palliative Schooling in an Era of Racial Equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1