Edward J Robb, Cassius M Tucker, Lane Corley, W Lawrence Bryson, Karen C Rogers, Kynan Sturgess, Donald J Bade, Bruce Brodersen
{"title":"图拉霉素或恩诺沙星对饲养小牛自然发生的牛呼吸道疾病的初步治疗效果。","authors":"Edward J Robb, Cassius M Tucker, Lane Corley, W Lawrence Bryson, Karen C Rogers, Kynan Sturgess, Donald J Bade, Bruce Brodersen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After undergoing arrival processing at one of two commercial feedlots, feeder calves with clinical signs of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were randomly assigned to receive either tulathromycin (2.4 mg/kg SC) or enrofloxacin (12.5 mg/kg SC). Additional therapy for calves that did not respond to initial treatment followed a prescribed course. Initial treatment with tulathromycin resulted in significantly higher (P = .009 and P = .031 at sites 1 and 2, respectively) therapeutic success (87.9% and 80%, respectively) than did initial treatment with enrofloxacin (70.2% and 62.5%, respectively). Animals treated with tulathromycin also had fewer subsequent treatments and higher weight gains compared with those treated with enrofloxacin.</p>","PeriodicalId":51211,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Therapeutics","volume":"8 2","pages":"127-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of tulathromycin or enrofloxacin for initial treatment of naturally occurring bovine respiratory disease in feeder calves.\",\"authors\":\"Edward J Robb, Cassius M Tucker, Lane Corley, W Lawrence Bryson, Karen C Rogers, Kynan Sturgess, Donald J Bade, Bruce Brodersen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After undergoing arrival processing at one of two commercial feedlots, feeder calves with clinical signs of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were randomly assigned to receive either tulathromycin (2.4 mg/kg SC) or enrofloxacin (12.5 mg/kg SC). Additional therapy for calves that did not respond to initial treatment followed a prescribed course. Initial treatment with tulathromycin resulted in significantly higher (P = .009 and P = .031 at sites 1 and 2, respectively) therapeutic success (87.9% and 80%, respectively) than did initial treatment with enrofloxacin (70.2% and 62.5%, respectively). Animals treated with tulathromycin also had fewer subsequent treatments and higher weight gains compared with those treated with enrofloxacin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"127-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在经过两个商业饲养场之一的到达处理后,有牛呼吸道疾病临床症状(BRD)的饲养小牛被随机分配接受图拉霉素(2.4 mg/kg SC)或恩诺沙星(12.5 mg/kg SC)。对最初治疗没有反应的小牛进行额外治疗,遵循规定的疗程。图拉霉素初始治疗的治疗成功率(87.9%,80%)显著高于恩诺沙星初始治疗的成功率(70.2%,62.5%)(P = 0.009, P = 0.031,位点1和2)。与用恩诺沙星治疗的动物相比,用图拉霉素治疗的动物后续治疗较少,体重增加较多。
Efficacy of tulathromycin or enrofloxacin for initial treatment of naturally occurring bovine respiratory disease in feeder calves.
After undergoing arrival processing at one of two commercial feedlots, feeder calves with clinical signs of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were randomly assigned to receive either tulathromycin (2.4 mg/kg SC) or enrofloxacin (12.5 mg/kg SC). Additional therapy for calves that did not respond to initial treatment followed a prescribed course. Initial treatment with tulathromycin resulted in significantly higher (P = .009 and P = .031 at sites 1 and 2, respectively) therapeutic success (87.9% and 80%, respectively) than did initial treatment with enrofloxacin (70.2% and 62.5%, respectively). Animals treated with tulathromycin also had fewer subsequent treatments and higher weight gains compared with those treated with enrofloxacin.