突触间隙中谷氨酸扩散的分子动力学模拟。

Sean M Cory, Mladen I Glavinovic
{"title":"突触间隙中谷氨酸扩散的分子动力学模拟。","authors":"Sean M Cory,&nbsp;Mladen I Glavinovic","doi":"10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diffusion of transmitters in the synaptic cleft critically influences synaptic efficacy by affecting both the amplitude and the time course of quantal events, but the value of the diffusion constant is speculative. In this study, we use molecular dynamics simulations to determine how the spatial confinement and membrane charges affect the diffusion constants of glutamate- and water as well as general properties of their diffusion. The synaptic cleft is represented as the space enclosed by two single-wall carbon sheets. Both water and especially glutamate are concentrated near the pore wall, where the concentration of glutamate can reach 30-50 times the mean value and the concentration of water can reach 2-8 times the mean value. Such spatial profiles of glutamate contradict the classical notions of diffusion on which both continuous and Monte Carlo simulations are built. The layering of glutamate- and water molecules suggests that the interfacial glutamate-cleft wall (or water-cleft wall) interactions may critically regulate their diffusion in the cleft. Indeed, the effective longitudinal diffusion constant of glutamate is steeply dependent on the cleft width, but only when the cleft is very narrow (< 5 nm). Therefore, even for a cleft as narrow as at the glutamatergic synapse in the central nervous system, the effective diffusion constant of glutamate will not be much lower than free diffusion in the bulk solution due to confinement. The effective diffusion constant of water is considerably less sensitive to cleft width over the same range of cleft widths than is glutamate, but is also higher than that of glutamate. Finally, the layering of glutamate and water and their effective diffusion constants are largely independent of how the cleft wall is charged. In conclusion, in the confined space of the synaptic cleft, glutamate is layered near the wall. Consequently, its diffusion constant becomes dependent on the cleft width. However, the diffusion of glutamate is slower than its free diffusion in water only if the cleft is very narrow. If the width of the cleft is consistent with that determined by morphometric studies in the central nervous system, glutamate diffusion should not be slowed by confinement and is thus likely to be similar to that in free solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":10778,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in neurobiology","volume":"18 1-2","pages":"61-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular dynamics simulations of glutamate diffusion in synaptic cleft.\",\"authors\":\"Sean M Cory,&nbsp;Mladen I Glavinovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diffusion of transmitters in the synaptic cleft critically influences synaptic efficacy by affecting both the amplitude and the time course of quantal events, but the value of the diffusion constant is speculative. In this study, we use molecular dynamics simulations to determine how the spatial confinement and membrane charges affect the diffusion constants of glutamate- and water as well as general properties of their diffusion. The synaptic cleft is represented as the space enclosed by two single-wall carbon sheets. Both water and especially glutamate are concentrated near the pore wall, where the concentration of glutamate can reach 30-50 times the mean value and the concentration of water can reach 2-8 times the mean value. Such spatial profiles of glutamate contradict the classical notions of diffusion on which both continuous and Monte Carlo simulations are built. The layering of glutamate- and water molecules suggests that the interfacial glutamate-cleft wall (or water-cleft wall) interactions may critically regulate their diffusion in the cleft. Indeed, the effective longitudinal diffusion constant of glutamate is steeply dependent on the cleft width, but only when the cleft is very narrow (< 5 nm). Therefore, even for a cleft as narrow as at the glutamatergic synapse in the central nervous system, the effective diffusion constant of glutamate will not be much lower than free diffusion in the bulk solution due to confinement. The effective diffusion constant of water is considerably less sensitive to cleft width over the same range of cleft widths than is glutamate, but is also higher than that of glutamate. Finally, the layering of glutamate and water and their effective diffusion constants are largely independent of how the cleft wall is charged. In conclusion, in the confined space of the synaptic cleft, glutamate is layered near the wall. Consequently, its diffusion constant becomes dependent on the cleft width. However, the diffusion of glutamate is slower than its free diffusion in water only if the cleft is very narrow. If the width of the cleft is consistent with that determined by morphometric studies in the central nervous system, glutamate diffusion should not be slowed by confinement and is thus likely to be similar to that in free solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"18 1-2\",\"pages\":\"61-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

突触间隙中的递质扩散通过影响量子事件的振幅和时间过程对突触效能产生关键影响,但扩散常数的值是推测性的。在这项研究中,我们使用分子动力学模拟来确定空间约束和膜电荷如何影响谷氨酸和水的扩散常数以及它们的扩散特性。突触间隙表示为两个单壁碳片包围的空间。水尤其是谷氨酸都集中在孔壁附近,其中谷氨酸的浓度可达到平均值的30-50倍,水的浓度可达到平均值的2-8倍。这种谷氨酸的空间分布与经典的扩散概念相矛盾,而经典的扩散概念是建立在连续和蒙特卡罗模拟的基础上的。谷氨酸和水分子的分层表明,谷氨酸-裂隙壁(或水-裂隙壁)界面相互作用可能对谷氨酸-水分子在裂隙中的扩散起到关键调节作用。事实上,谷氨酸的有效纵向扩散常数与间隙宽度密切相关,但仅当间隙非常窄(< 5 nm)时如此。因此,即使是像中枢神经系统谷氨酸能突触那样狭窄的间隙,谷氨酸的有效扩散常数也不会因为限制而比散装溶液中的自由扩散低很多。在相同的裂缝宽度范围内,水的有效扩散常数对裂缝宽度的敏感性明显低于谷氨酸,但也高于谷氨酸。最后,谷氨酸和水的分层及其有效扩散常数在很大程度上与裂壁如何带电无关。综上所述,在突触间隙的狭窄空间内,谷氨酸在壁附近呈层状分布。因此,它的扩散常数依赖于裂缝宽度。然而,只有当缝隙很窄时,谷氨酸的扩散才比其在水中的自由扩散慢。如果裂缝的宽度与中枢神经系统形态测量学研究确定的宽度一致,谷氨酸的扩散不应因限制而减慢,因此可能与自由溶液中的相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Molecular dynamics simulations of glutamate diffusion in synaptic cleft.

Diffusion of transmitters in the synaptic cleft critically influences synaptic efficacy by affecting both the amplitude and the time course of quantal events, but the value of the diffusion constant is speculative. In this study, we use molecular dynamics simulations to determine how the spatial confinement and membrane charges affect the diffusion constants of glutamate- and water as well as general properties of their diffusion. The synaptic cleft is represented as the space enclosed by two single-wall carbon sheets. Both water and especially glutamate are concentrated near the pore wall, where the concentration of glutamate can reach 30-50 times the mean value and the concentration of water can reach 2-8 times the mean value. Such spatial profiles of glutamate contradict the classical notions of diffusion on which both continuous and Monte Carlo simulations are built. The layering of glutamate- and water molecules suggests that the interfacial glutamate-cleft wall (or water-cleft wall) interactions may critically regulate their diffusion in the cleft. Indeed, the effective longitudinal diffusion constant of glutamate is steeply dependent on the cleft width, but only when the cleft is very narrow (< 5 nm). Therefore, even for a cleft as narrow as at the glutamatergic synapse in the central nervous system, the effective diffusion constant of glutamate will not be much lower than free diffusion in the bulk solution due to confinement. The effective diffusion constant of water is considerably less sensitive to cleft width over the same range of cleft widths than is glutamate, but is also higher than that of glutamate. Finally, the layering of glutamate and water and their effective diffusion constants are largely independent of how the cleft wall is charged. In conclusion, in the confined space of the synaptic cleft, glutamate is layered near the wall. Consequently, its diffusion constant becomes dependent on the cleft width. However, the diffusion of glutamate is slower than its free diffusion in water only if the cleft is very narrow. If the width of the cleft is consistent with that determined by morphometric studies in the central nervous system, glutamate diffusion should not be slowed by confinement and is thus likely to be similar to that in free solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dopaminergic modulation of the neuron activity in the cerebral cortex of the wakeful animal. The role of intermediate filament proteins in the development of neurological disease. Cerebellar-dependent learning as a neurobehavioral index of the cannabinoid system. Methylphenidate treated at the test cage--dose-dependent sensitization or tolerance depend on the behavioral assay used. Psychiatric implications of hepatitis-C infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1