John F MacDonald, Michael F Jackson, Michael A Beazely
{"title":"海马长期突触可塑性与NMDA受体的信号放大。","authors":"John F MacDonald, Michael F Jackson, Michael A Beazely","doi":"10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The direction of plasticity at CA3-CA1 hippocampal synapses is determined by the strength of afferent stimulation. Weak stimuli lead to long-term depression (LTD) and strong stimuli to long-term potentiation (LTP), but both require activation of synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs). These receptors are therefore necessary and required for the induction of plasticity at CA3-CA1 synapses even though they carry little of the current responsible for the basal excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP). The influx of Ca(2+) via NMDARs triggers the subsequent and persistent changes in the expression of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5 methylisoxazole-4-proprionic acid receptors (AMPARs) and these receptors are responsible for the major part of the basal EPSP. The degree of activity of NMDARs is determined in part by extracellular Mg(2+) and by the co-agonists for this receptor, glycine and D-serine. During strong stimulation, a relief of the voltage-dependent block of NMDARs by Mg(2+) provides a positive feedback for NMDAR Ca(2+) influx into postsynaptic CA1 spines. In this review, we discuss how the induction of LTP at CA3-CA1 synapses requires further signal amplification of NMDAR activity. We discuss how the regulation of NMDARs by protein kinases and phosphatases is brought into play. Evidence is presented that Src family kinases (SFKs) play a \"core\" role in the induction of LTP by enhancing the function and expression of NMDARs. At CA3-CA1 synapses, NMDARs are largely composed of NR1 (NMDA receptor subunit 1)-NR2A or NR1-NR2B containing subunits. Recent, but controversial, evidence has correlated NR1-NR2A receptors with the induction of LTP and NR1-NR2B receptors with LTD. However, LTP can be induced by activation of either subtype of NMDAR and the ratio of NR2A:NR2B receptors has been proposed as an alternative determinant of the direction of synaptic plasticity. Many transmitters and signal pathways can modify NMDAR function and expression and, for a given stimulus strength, they can potentially lead to a change in the balance between LTP and LTD. As opposed to the \"core\" mechanisms of LTP and LTD, the resulting alterations in this balance underlie \"meta-plasticity.\" Thus, in addition to their contribution to core mechanisms, we will also discuss how Src-family kinases could preferentially target NR1-NR2A or NR1-NR2B receptors to alter the relative contribution of these receptor subtypes to synaptic plasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10778,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in neurobiology","volume":"18 1-2","pages":"71-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"180","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity and signal amplification of NMDA receptors.\",\"authors\":\"John F MacDonald, Michael F Jackson, Michael A Beazely\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.80\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The direction of plasticity at CA3-CA1 hippocampal synapses is determined by the strength of afferent stimulation. Weak stimuli lead to long-term depression (LTD) and strong stimuli to long-term potentiation (LTP), but both require activation of synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs). These receptors are therefore necessary and required for the induction of plasticity at CA3-CA1 synapses even though they carry little of the current responsible for the basal excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP). The influx of Ca(2+) via NMDARs triggers the subsequent and persistent changes in the expression of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5 methylisoxazole-4-proprionic acid receptors (AMPARs) and these receptors are responsible for the major part of the basal EPSP. The degree of activity of NMDARs is determined in part by extracellular Mg(2+) and by the co-agonists for this receptor, glycine and D-serine. During strong stimulation, a relief of the voltage-dependent block of NMDARs by Mg(2+) provides a positive feedback for NMDAR Ca(2+) influx into postsynaptic CA1 spines. In this review, we discuss how the induction of LTP at CA3-CA1 synapses requires further signal amplification of NMDAR activity. We discuss how the regulation of NMDARs by protein kinases and phosphatases is brought into play. Evidence is presented that Src family kinases (SFKs) play a \\\"core\\\" role in the induction of LTP by enhancing the function and expression of NMDARs. At CA3-CA1 synapses, NMDARs are largely composed of NR1 (NMDA receptor subunit 1)-NR2A or NR1-NR2B containing subunits. Recent, but controversial, evidence has correlated NR1-NR2A receptors with the induction of LTP and NR1-NR2B receptors with LTD. However, LTP can be induced by activation of either subtype of NMDAR and the ratio of NR2A:NR2B receptors has been proposed as an alternative determinant of the direction of synaptic plasticity. Many transmitters and signal pathways can modify NMDAR function and expression and, for a given stimulus strength, they can potentially lead to a change in the balance between LTP and LTD. As opposed to the \\\"core\\\" mechanisms of LTP and LTD, the resulting alterations in this balance underlie \\\"meta-plasticity.\\\" Thus, in addition to their contribution to core mechanisms, we will also discuss how Src-family kinases could preferentially target NR1-NR2A or NR1-NR2B receptors to alter the relative contribution of these receptor subtypes to synaptic plasticity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"18 1-2\",\"pages\":\"71-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"180\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.80\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v18.i1-2.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 180
摘要
海马CA3-CA1突触的可塑性方向由传入刺激的强度决定。弱刺激导致长期抑制(LTD)和强刺激导致长期增强(LTP),但两者都需要激活突触n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸受体(NMDARs)。因此,这些受体对于诱导CA3-CA1突触的可塑性是必需的,尽管它们携带的负责基底兴奋性突触后电位(EPSP)的电流很少。Ca(2+)通过NMDARs的内流触发α -氨基-3-羟基-5甲基异恶唑-4-本体酸受体(AMPARs)表达的随后和持续的变化,这些受体负责基础EPSP的主要部分。NMDARs的活性程度部分由细胞外Mg(2+)和该受体的协同激动剂甘氨酸和d -丝氨酸决定。在强刺激期间,Mg(2+)缓解NMDAR的电压依赖性阻滞,为NMDAR Ca(2+)涌入突触后CA1棘提供了正反馈。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了在CA3-CA1突触诱导LTP如何需要进一步放大NMDAR活性的信号。我们讨论了蛋白激酶和磷酸酶是如何调控NMDARs的。有证据表明Src家族激酶(SFKs)通过增强NMDARs的功能和表达,在LTP的诱导中发挥“核心”作用。在CA3-CA1突触,NMDARs主要由NR1 (NMDA受体亚基1)-NR2A或NR1- nr2b亚基组成。最近,但有争议的证据表明NR1-NR2A受体与LTP的诱导有关,NR1-NR2B受体与LTD有关。然而,LTP可以通过NMDAR的任何一种亚型的激活来诱导,并且NR2A:NR2B受体的比例被认为是突触可塑性方向的另一个决定因素。许多递质和信号通路可以改变NMDAR的功能和表达,并且对于给定的刺激强度,它们可能导致LTP和LTD之间平衡的改变。与LTP和LTD的“核心”机制相反,这种平衡的结果变化是“元可塑性”的基础。因此,除了它们对核心机制的贡献外,我们还将讨论src家族激酶如何优先靶向NR1-NR2A或NR1-NR2B受体,以改变这些受体亚型对突触可塑性的相对贡献。
Hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity and signal amplification of NMDA receptors.
The direction of plasticity at CA3-CA1 hippocampal synapses is determined by the strength of afferent stimulation. Weak stimuli lead to long-term depression (LTD) and strong stimuli to long-term potentiation (LTP), but both require activation of synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs). These receptors are therefore necessary and required for the induction of plasticity at CA3-CA1 synapses even though they carry little of the current responsible for the basal excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP). The influx of Ca(2+) via NMDARs triggers the subsequent and persistent changes in the expression of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5 methylisoxazole-4-proprionic acid receptors (AMPARs) and these receptors are responsible for the major part of the basal EPSP. The degree of activity of NMDARs is determined in part by extracellular Mg(2+) and by the co-agonists for this receptor, glycine and D-serine. During strong stimulation, a relief of the voltage-dependent block of NMDARs by Mg(2+) provides a positive feedback for NMDAR Ca(2+) influx into postsynaptic CA1 spines. In this review, we discuss how the induction of LTP at CA3-CA1 synapses requires further signal amplification of NMDAR activity. We discuss how the regulation of NMDARs by protein kinases and phosphatases is brought into play. Evidence is presented that Src family kinases (SFKs) play a "core" role in the induction of LTP by enhancing the function and expression of NMDARs. At CA3-CA1 synapses, NMDARs are largely composed of NR1 (NMDA receptor subunit 1)-NR2A or NR1-NR2B containing subunits. Recent, but controversial, evidence has correlated NR1-NR2A receptors with the induction of LTP and NR1-NR2B receptors with LTD. However, LTP can be induced by activation of either subtype of NMDAR and the ratio of NR2A:NR2B receptors has been proposed as an alternative determinant of the direction of synaptic plasticity. Many transmitters and signal pathways can modify NMDAR function and expression and, for a given stimulus strength, they can potentially lead to a change in the balance between LTP and LTD. As opposed to the "core" mechanisms of LTP and LTD, the resulting alterations in this balance underlie "meta-plasticity." Thus, in addition to their contribution to core mechanisms, we will also discuss how Src-family kinases could preferentially target NR1-NR2A or NR1-NR2B receptors to alter the relative contribution of these receptor subtypes to synaptic plasticity.