医疗保险受益人糖尿病患者绩效反馈和护士病例管理的成本和效果:一项随机对照试验。

Jeph Herrin, Charles B Cangialose, David Nicewander, David J Ballard
{"title":"医疗保险受益人糖尿病患者绩效反馈和护士病例管理的成本和效果:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Jeph Herrin,&nbsp;Charles B Cangialose,&nbsp;David Nicewander,&nbsp;David J Ballard","doi":"10.1089/dis.2007.106719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurse case management has been shown to improve the quality of diabetes care in closed model health maintenance organizations and Veterans Affairs medical clinics. A randomized controlled trial of a similar intervention within HealthTexas Provider Network, a fee-for-service primary care network in North Texas, demonstrated no benefit in processes of care or clinical outcomes for Medicare diabetes patients. To investigate whether the case management model impacted the cost of diabetes care from the Medicare perspective, we compared the average payments and charges incurred between intervention arms: claims-based audit and feedback; claims- and medical-record-based audit and feedback; and claims- and medical-record-based audit and feedback plus a practice-based diabetes resource nurse. Following adjustment for baseline differences between groups, no significant differences were observed. Thus, within this setting, it appears the nurse case management model produced no improvement in either clinical quality or in costs associated with diabetes from a Medicare perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"10 6","pages":"328-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.106719","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost and effects of performance feedback and nurse case management for medicare beneficiaries with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jeph Herrin,&nbsp;Charles B Cangialose,&nbsp;David Nicewander,&nbsp;David J Ballard\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dis.2007.106719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nurse case management has been shown to improve the quality of diabetes care in closed model health maintenance organizations and Veterans Affairs medical clinics. A randomized controlled trial of a similar intervention within HealthTexas Provider Network, a fee-for-service primary care network in North Texas, demonstrated no benefit in processes of care or clinical outcomes for Medicare diabetes patients. To investigate whether the case management model impacted the cost of diabetes care from the Medicare perspective, we compared the average payments and charges incurred between intervention arms: claims-based audit and feedback; claims- and medical-record-based audit and feedback; and claims- and medical-record-based audit and feedback plus a practice-based diabetes resource nurse. Following adjustment for baseline differences between groups, no significant differences were observed. Thus, within this setting, it appears the nurse case management model produced no improvement in either clinical quality or in costs associated with diabetes from a Medicare perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disease Management : Dm\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"328-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.106719\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disease Management : Dm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.106719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease Management : Dm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.106719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

护士病例管理已被证明可以提高封闭模式健康维护组织和退伍军人事务医疗诊所的糖尿病护理质量。在德克萨斯州北部的收费初级保健网络HealthTexas提供者网络中进行的一项类似干预的随机对照试验表明,对医疗保险糖尿病患者的护理过程或临床结果没有任何益处。为了从医疗保险的角度调查病例管理模式是否影响糖尿病护理的成本,我们比较了干预组之间的平均支付和收费:基于索赔的审计和反馈;基于索赔和医疗记录的审计和反馈;基于索赔和医疗记录的审计和反馈以及基于实践的糖尿病资源护士。调整各组间基线差异后,未观察到显著差异。因此,在这种情况下,从医疗保险的角度来看,护士病例管理模式似乎没有改善临床质量或与糖尿病相关的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost and effects of performance feedback and nurse case management for medicare beneficiaries with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

Nurse case management has been shown to improve the quality of diabetes care in closed model health maintenance organizations and Veterans Affairs medical clinics. A randomized controlled trial of a similar intervention within HealthTexas Provider Network, a fee-for-service primary care network in North Texas, demonstrated no benefit in processes of care or clinical outcomes for Medicare diabetes patients. To investigate whether the case management model impacted the cost of diabetes care from the Medicare perspective, we compared the average payments and charges incurred between intervention arms: claims-based audit and feedback; claims- and medical-record-based audit and feedback; and claims- and medical-record-based audit and feedback plus a practice-based diabetes resource nurse. Following adjustment for baseline differences between groups, no significant differences were observed. Thus, within this setting, it appears the nurse case management model produced no improvement in either clinical quality or in costs associated with diabetes from a Medicare perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving medication adherence with a targeted, technology-driven disease management intervention. Weight loss and maintenance outcomes using moderate and severe caloric restriction in an outpatient setting. Where we've gone wrong. Disease management programs for the underserved. Co-occurring mental illness and health care utilization and expenditures in adults with obesity and chronic physical illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1