选择性医疗管理策略。

Donald Fetterolf, Marty Olson
{"title":"选择性医疗管理策略。","authors":"Donald Fetterolf,&nbsp;Marty Olson","doi":"10.1089/dis.2008.111721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, health plans and disease management companies have employed \"opt-out\" strategies for evaluating medical management outcomes across larger populations, targeting the entire population of eligible individuals and allowing those not interested to opt out. Recent observations that the predominant effort of these programs is on high-risk patients has lead some managers to suggest that the focus be on only those individuals with an anticipated higher effectiveness and lower cost to the payers of such services. They believe such \"opt-in\" models, in which only higher risk participants are targeted and enrolled, will deliver higher value. The use of common opt-in models, however, is not only methodologically unsound, but experience in the field suggests there may be less overall effect as well. Calculation methods for developing impact remain extremely sensitive to methodology</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"11 1","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2008.111721","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opt-in medical management strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Donald Fetterolf,&nbsp;Marty Olson\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dis.2008.111721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Historically, health plans and disease management companies have employed \\\"opt-out\\\" strategies for evaluating medical management outcomes across larger populations, targeting the entire population of eligible individuals and allowing those not interested to opt out. Recent observations that the predominant effort of these programs is on high-risk patients has lead some managers to suggest that the focus be on only those individuals with an anticipated higher effectiveness and lower cost to the payers of such services. They believe such \\\"opt-in\\\" models, in which only higher risk participants are targeted and enrolled, will deliver higher value. The use of common opt-in models, however, is not only methodologically unsound, but experience in the field suggests there may be less overall effect as well. Calculation methods for developing impact remain extremely sensitive to methodology</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disease Management : Dm\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"37-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2008.111721\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disease Management : Dm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2008.111721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease Management : Dm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2008.111721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从历史上看,健康计划和疾病管理公司采用“选择退出”策略来评估更大人群的医疗管理结果,针对所有符合条件的个人,并允许那些不感兴趣的人选择退出。最近的观察表明,这些项目的主要努力是针对高危患者,这使得一些管理者建议,只关注那些对此类服务的支付者来说预期效果更高、成本更低的个人。他们认为,这种“选择加入”模式——只有高风险参与者才会被锁定并登记——将带来更高的价值。然而,使用普通的选择加入模型不仅在方法上是不健全的,而且该领域的经验表明,总体效果也可能较差。发展影响的计算方法仍然对方法学极为敏感
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Opt-in medical management strategies.

Historically, health plans and disease management companies have employed "opt-out" strategies for evaluating medical management outcomes across larger populations, targeting the entire population of eligible individuals and allowing those not interested to opt out. Recent observations that the predominant effort of these programs is on high-risk patients has lead some managers to suggest that the focus be on only those individuals with an anticipated higher effectiveness and lower cost to the payers of such services. They believe such "opt-in" models, in which only higher risk participants are targeted and enrolled, will deliver higher value. The use of common opt-in models, however, is not only methodologically unsound, but experience in the field suggests there may be less overall effect as well. Calculation methods for developing impact remain extremely sensitive to methodology

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving medication adherence with a targeted, technology-driven disease management intervention. Weight loss and maintenance outcomes using moderate and severe caloric restriction in an outpatient setting. Where we've gone wrong. Disease management programs for the underserved. Co-occurring mental illness and health care utilization and expenditures in adults with obesity and chronic physical illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1