[高剂量化疗治疗的高危乳腺癌患者蛋白表达谱的预后和预测影响]。

R Diallo-Danebrock, E Ting, O Gluz, A Herr, S Mohrmann, H Geddert, H E Gabbert, U Nitz, C Poremba
{"title":"[高剂量化疗治疗的高危乳腺癌患者蛋白表达谱的预后和预测影响]。","authors":"R Diallo-Danebrock,&nbsp;E Ting,&nbsp;O Gluz,&nbsp;A Herr,&nbsp;S Mohrmann,&nbsp;H Geddert,&nbsp;H E Gabbert,&nbsp;U Nitz,&nbsp;C Poremba","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression profiles was analyzed in high-risk breast cancer patients who had previously been shown to benefit from high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in comparison to dose-dense chemotherapy (DDCT). Using tissue microarrays, the expression of 34 protein markers was evaluated in 236 patients who had received either HDCT or DDCT (in the WSG AM01 trial). 1) 24 protein markers of the initial panel of 34 markers were sufficient to identify five profile clusters by K-means clustering: luminal A (27%), luminal B (12%), HER-2 (21%), basal-like (13%) cluster and a so called 'multiple marker negative'=MMN cluster (27%) characterized by the absence of specifying markers. 2) After DDCT, HER-2 and basal-like groups had significantly worse event-free survival (EFS) (HR 3.6 (95% CI, 1.65-8.18; p = 0.001) and HR 3.7 (95% CI, 1.68-8.48); p < 0.0001), respectively) when compared to both luminal groups. 3) After HDCT, the hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.76-3.05) for EFS in the HER-2 subgroups and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.37-3.32) in the basal-like subgroups which indicates a better outcome for patients in the HER-2 and basal-like subgroups who received HDCT. Protein expression profiling in high-risk breast cancers identified 5 subtypes, which differed with respect to survival and response to chemotherapy: In contrast to luminal A and B subtypes, HER-2 and basal-like subgroups had a significant predictive benefit from HDCT when compared to DDCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":76792,"journal":{"name":"Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Pathologie","volume":"91 ","pages":"187-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression profiling in high risk breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy].\",\"authors\":\"R Diallo-Danebrock,&nbsp;E Ting,&nbsp;O Gluz,&nbsp;A Herr,&nbsp;S Mohrmann,&nbsp;H Geddert,&nbsp;H E Gabbert,&nbsp;U Nitz,&nbsp;C Poremba\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression profiles was analyzed in high-risk breast cancer patients who had previously been shown to benefit from high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in comparison to dose-dense chemotherapy (DDCT). Using tissue microarrays, the expression of 34 protein markers was evaluated in 236 patients who had received either HDCT or DDCT (in the WSG AM01 trial). 1) 24 protein markers of the initial panel of 34 markers were sufficient to identify five profile clusters by K-means clustering: luminal A (27%), luminal B (12%), HER-2 (21%), basal-like (13%) cluster and a so called 'multiple marker negative'=MMN cluster (27%) characterized by the absence of specifying markers. 2) After DDCT, HER-2 and basal-like groups had significantly worse event-free survival (EFS) (HR 3.6 (95% CI, 1.65-8.18; p = 0.001) and HR 3.7 (95% CI, 1.68-8.48); p < 0.0001), respectively) when compared to both luminal groups. 3) After HDCT, the hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.76-3.05) for EFS in the HER-2 subgroups and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.37-3.32) in the basal-like subgroups which indicates a better outcome for patients in the HER-2 and basal-like subgroups who received HDCT. Protein expression profiling in high-risk breast cancers identified 5 subtypes, which differed with respect to survival and response to chemotherapy: In contrast to luminal A and B subtypes, HER-2 and basal-like subgroups had a significant predictive benefit from HDCT when compared to DDCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Pathologie\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"187-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Pathologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Pathologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛋白表达谱对高危乳腺癌患者的预后和预测影响进行了分析,这些患者先前已被证明从高剂量化疗(HDCT)中获益,而不是剂量密集化疗(DDCT)。利用组织微阵列技术,对236例接受HDCT或DDCT的患者(在WSG AM01试验中)34种蛋白标记物的表达进行了评估。1)最初的34个标记中的24个蛋白质标记足以通过K-means聚类识别出5个特征簇:luminal A (27%), luminal B (12%), HER-2(21%),基底样(13%)簇和所谓的“多标记阴性”=MMN簇(27%),其特征是缺乏特定的标记。2) DDCT后,HER-2组和基底样组的无事件生存期(EFS)明显较差(HR 3.6 (95% CI, 1.65-8.18;p = 0.001),危险度3.7 (95% CI, 1.68-8.48);P < 0.0001))。3) HDCT后,HER-2亚组EFS的风险比为1.5 (95% CI, 0.76-3.05),基底样亚组的风险比为1.1 (95% CI, 0.37-3.32),表明HER-2和基底样亚组患者接受HDCT后预后更好。高危乳腺癌的蛋白表达谱确定了5种亚型,它们在生存和化疗反应方面存在差异:与腔A和B亚型相比,HER-2和基底样亚组与DDCT相比,HDCT具有显著的预测益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression profiling in high risk breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy].

The prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression profiles was analyzed in high-risk breast cancer patients who had previously been shown to benefit from high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in comparison to dose-dense chemotherapy (DDCT). Using tissue microarrays, the expression of 34 protein markers was evaluated in 236 patients who had received either HDCT or DDCT (in the WSG AM01 trial). 1) 24 protein markers of the initial panel of 34 markers were sufficient to identify five profile clusters by K-means clustering: luminal A (27%), luminal B (12%), HER-2 (21%), basal-like (13%) cluster and a so called 'multiple marker negative'=MMN cluster (27%) characterized by the absence of specifying markers. 2) After DDCT, HER-2 and basal-like groups had significantly worse event-free survival (EFS) (HR 3.6 (95% CI, 1.65-8.18; p = 0.001) and HR 3.7 (95% CI, 1.68-8.48); p < 0.0001), respectively) when compared to both luminal groups. 3) After HDCT, the hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.76-3.05) for EFS in the HER-2 subgroups and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.37-3.32) in the basal-like subgroups which indicates a better outcome for patients in the HER-2 and basal-like subgroups who received HDCT. Protein expression profiling in high-risk breast cancers identified 5 subtypes, which differed with respect to survival and response to chemotherapy: In contrast to luminal A and B subtypes, HER-2 and basal-like subgroups had a significant predictive benefit from HDCT when compared to DDCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The complement system]. [Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis]. [Drug-induced liver injury]. Molecular pathology of lung cancer [Chronic myeloproliferative diseases].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1