加州大学洛杉矶分校硬皮病临床试验联盟胃肠道仪器的信度和效度。

Dinesh Khanna, Ron D Hays, Paul Maranian, James R Seibold, Ann Impens, Maureen D Mayes, Philip J Clements, Terri Getzug, Nihal Fathi, Amber Bechtel, Daniel E Furst
{"title":"加州大学洛杉矶分校硬皮病临床试验联盟胃肠道仪器的信度和效度。","authors":"Dinesh Khanna,&nbsp;Ron D Hays,&nbsp;Paul Maranian,&nbsp;James R Seibold,&nbsp;Ann Impens,&nbsp;Maureen D Mayes,&nbsp;Philip J Clements,&nbsp;Terri Getzug,&nbsp;Nihal Fathi,&nbsp;Amber Bechtel,&nbsp;Daniel E Furst","doi":"10.1002/art.24730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To refine the previously developed scleroderma (systemic sclerosis [SSc]) gastrointestinal tract (GIT) instrument (SSC-GIT 1.0).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the SSC-GIT 1.0 and the Short Form 36 to 152 patients with SSc; 1 item was added to the SSC-GIT 1.0 to assess rectal incontinence. In addition, subjects completed a rating of the severity of their GIT involvement (from very mild to very severe). Evaluation of psychometric properties included internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability (mean time interval 1.1 weeks), and multitrait scaling analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants were mostly women (84%) and white (81%); 55% had diffuse SSc. Self-rated severity of GIT involvement ranged from no symptoms to very mild (39%), mild (21%), moderate (31%), and severe/very severe (9%). Of an initial 53 items in the SSC-GIT 1.0, 19 items were excluded, leaving a 34-item revised instrument (the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 [UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0]). Analyses supported 7 multi-item scales: reflux, distention/bloating, diarrhea, fecal soilage, constipation, emotional well-being, and social functioning. Test-retest reliability estimates were >/=0.68 and coefficient alphas were >/=0.67. Participants who rated their GIT disease as mild had lower scores on a 0-3 scale on all 7 scales. Symptom scales were also able to discriminate subjects with corresponding clinical GIT diagnoses. The Total GIT Score, developed by averaging 6 of 7 scales (excluding constipation), was reliable and provided greater discrimination between mild, moderate, and severe self-rated GIT involvement than individual scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0, an improvement over the SSC-GIT 1.0, and supports a Total GIT Score in SSc patients with GIT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8405,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis and rheumatism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/art.24730","citationCount":"201","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument.\",\"authors\":\"Dinesh Khanna,&nbsp;Ron D Hays,&nbsp;Paul Maranian,&nbsp;James R Seibold,&nbsp;Ann Impens,&nbsp;Maureen D Mayes,&nbsp;Philip J Clements,&nbsp;Terri Getzug,&nbsp;Nihal Fathi,&nbsp;Amber Bechtel,&nbsp;Daniel E Furst\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/art.24730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To refine the previously developed scleroderma (systemic sclerosis [SSc]) gastrointestinal tract (GIT) instrument (SSC-GIT 1.0).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the SSC-GIT 1.0 and the Short Form 36 to 152 patients with SSc; 1 item was added to the SSC-GIT 1.0 to assess rectal incontinence. In addition, subjects completed a rating of the severity of their GIT involvement (from very mild to very severe). Evaluation of psychometric properties included internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability (mean time interval 1.1 weeks), and multitrait scaling analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants were mostly women (84%) and white (81%); 55% had diffuse SSc. Self-rated severity of GIT involvement ranged from no symptoms to very mild (39%), mild (21%), moderate (31%), and severe/very severe (9%). Of an initial 53 items in the SSC-GIT 1.0, 19 items were excluded, leaving a 34-item revised instrument (the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 [UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0]). Analyses supported 7 multi-item scales: reflux, distention/bloating, diarrhea, fecal soilage, constipation, emotional well-being, and social functioning. Test-retest reliability estimates were >/=0.68 and coefficient alphas were >/=0.67. Participants who rated their GIT disease as mild had lower scores on a 0-3 scale on all 7 scales. Symptom scales were also able to discriminate subjects with corresponding clinical GIT diagnoses. The Total GIT Score, developed by averaging 6 of 7 scales (excluding constipation), was reliable and provided greater discrimination between mild, moderate, and severe self-rated GIT involvement than individual scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0, an improvement over the SSC-GIT 1.0, and supports a Total GIT Score in SSc patients with GIT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/art.24730\",\"citationCount\":\"201\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 201

摘要

目的:改进既往发病硬皮病(系统性硬化症[SSc])胃肠道(GIT)仪器(SSc -GIT 1.0)。方法:对152例SSc患者应用SSc - git 1.0和Short Form 36;SSC-GIT 1.0增加1项评估直肠失禁。此外,受试者完成了GIT受累程度的评分(从非常轻微到非常严重)。心理测量特性的评估包括内部一致性信度、重测信度(平均时间间隔1.1周)和多特质量表分析。结果:研究参与者以女性(84%)和白人(81%)为主;55%为弥漫性SSc。自评的GIT受累严重程度从无症状到非常轻微(39%)、轻度(21%)、中度(31%)和严重/非常严重(9%)不等。SSC-GIT 1.0最初的53个条目中,有19个条目被排除,剩下34个条目的修订工具(加州大学洛杉矶硬皮病临床试验联盟GIT 2.0 [UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0])。分析支持7个多项目量表:反流、胀气/腹胀、腹泻、粪便污染、便秘、情绪健康和社会功能。重测信度估计>/=0.68,alpha系数>/=0.67。将自己的GIT疾病评为轻度的参与者在所有7个量表上的0-3分都较低。症状量表也能区分具有相应临床GIT诊断的受试者。GIT总分是由7个量表(不包括便秘)中的6个量表平均得出的,它是可靠的,并且在轻度、中度和重度自评GIT累及程度之间提供了比单个量表更大的区别。结论:本研究支持UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0的信度和效度,在SSc -GIT 1.0的基础上进行了改进,并支持SSc合并GIT患者的GIT总分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument.

Objective: To refine the previously developed scleroderma (systemic sclerosis [SSc]) gastrointestinal tract (GIT) instrument (SSC-GIT 1.0).

Methods: We administered the SSC-GIT 1.0 and the Short Form 36 to 152 patients with SSc; 1 item was added to the SSC-GIT 1.0 to assess rectal incontinence. In addition, subjects completed a rating of the severity of their GIT involvement (from very mild to very severe). Evaluation of psychometric properties included internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability (mean time interval 1.1 weeks), and multitrait scaling analysis.

Results: Study participants were mostly women (84%) and white (81%); 55% had diffuse SSc. Self-rated severity of GIT involvement ranged from no symptoms to very mild (39%), mild (21%), moderate (31%), and severe/very severe (9%). Of an initial 53 items in the SSC-GIT 1.0, 19 items were excluded, leaving a 34-item revised instrument (the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 [UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0]). Analyses supported 7 multi-item scales: reflux, distention/bloating, diarrhea, fecal soilage, constipation, emotional well-being, and social functioning. Test-retest reliability estimates were >/=0.68 and coefficient alphas were >/=0.67. Participants who rated their GIT disease as mild had lower scores on a 0-3 scale on all 7 scales. Symptom scales were also able to discriminate subjects with corresponding clinical GIT diagnoses. The Total GIT Score, developed by averaging 6 of 7 scales (excluding constipation), was reliable and provided greater discrimination between mild, moderate, and severe self-rated GIT involvement than individual scales.

Conclusion: This study provides support for the reliability and validity of the UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0, an improvement over the SSC-GIT 1.0, and supports a Total GIT Score in SSc patients with GIT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arthritis and rheumatism
Arthritis and rheumatism 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
Double-blind, Randomized, 8-week Placebo-controlled followed by a 16-week open label extension study, with the LPA1 receptor antagonist SAR100842 for Patients With Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Secukinumab Achievement of Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Related Remission: 2-Year Results from a Phase 3 Study Assessment of methods to quantitatively evaluate global synovitis activity with FDG-PET/CT Antibodies Against Domain 1 and Domain 4/5 of β2 Glycoprotein I : Clinical Relevance in Obstetric Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome A Self-Determination Theory Based Intervention to Increase Levels of Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Self-Determined Motivation, Physical Activity and Improve Health Outcomes Among Patients Living with Rheumatoid Arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1