多巴胺激动剂治疗帕金森病。

GMS health technology assessment Pub Date : 2008-06-18
Brigitte Konta, Wilhelm Frank
{"title":"多巴胺激动剂治疗帕金森病。","authors":"Brigitte Konta,&nbsp;Wilhelm Frank","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson's disease is a chronic degenerative organic disease with unknown causes. A disappearance of cells with melanin in the substantia nigra is considered as biological artefact of the disease, which causes a degenerative loss of neurons in the corpus striatum of mesencephalon. This structure produces also the transmitter substance dopamine. Due to this disappearance of cells dopamine is not produced in a sufficient quantity which is needed for movement of the body.The questions of this report are concerned the efficiency and safety of a treatment with dopamine agonists. Furthermore the cost-effectiveness is investigated as well as ethic questions. The goal is to give recommendation for the use of dopamine agonists to the German health system.A systematic literature search was done. The identified studies have different methodological quality and investigate different hypothesis and different outcome criteria. Therefore a qualitative method of information synthesis was chosen.Since the introduction of L-Dopa in the 1960´s it is considered as the most effective substance to reduce all the cardinal symptoms of Parkinson disease. This substance was improved in the course of time. Firstly some additional substances were given (decarbonxylase inhibitors, catechol-o-transferase inhibitors (COMT-inhibitors), monoaminoxydase-inhibitors (MAO-inhibitors) and NMDA-antagonists (N-Methyl-d-aspartat-antagonists).In the practical therapy of Parkinson dopamine agonists play an important role, because they directly use the dopamine receptors. The monotherapy of Parkinson disease is basically possible and is used in early stages of the disease. Clinical practise has shown, that an add on therapy with dopamine agonists can led to a reduction of the dose of L-dopa and a reduction of following dyskinesia.The studies for effectiveness include studies for the initial therapy, monotherapy and add-on-therapy. Basically there is a good effectiveness of dopamine agonists the reduce dyskinesia and this differences are statistically significant. The effect of dopamine agonists is weaker then levodopa generally. The initial therapy with dopamine agonists can postpone the use of levodopa medication or keep the dose small for a longer period of time. There are more other side effects to levodopa, these are not statistically significant. The idea, which strategy for the treatment should be chosen is dependent of several factors and has to be evaluated with the individual patient. An important criterion is the age of the patient at the beginning of the treatment. For younger patients (under 65 years) the risk of developing motoric fluctuation and dyskinesia is much higher and therefore it is proposed to use levodopa at later stages. The evidence of the evaluated studies show a good effectiveness with the therapy of Parkinson disease as monotherapy of younger patients or as additional medication to levodopa as well as older patients with progressive stages of this disease. In these groups of patients there is a positive cost-benefit ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"4 ","pages":"Doc05"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/2f/HTA-04-05.PMC3011299.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The treatment of Parkinson's disease with dopamine agonists.\",\"authors\":\"Brigitte Konta,&nbsp;Wilhelm Frank\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Parkinson's disease is a chronic degenerative organic disease with unknown causes. A disappearance of cells with melanin in the substantia nigra is considered as biological artefact of the disease, which causes a degenerative loss of neurons in the corpus striatum of mesencephalon. This structure produces also the transmitter substance dopamine. Due to this disappearance of cells dopamine is not produced in a sufficient quantity which is needed for movement of the body.The questions of this report are concerned the efficiency and safety of a treatment with dopamine agonists. Furthermore the cost-effectiveness is investigated as well as ethic questions. The goal is to give recommendation for the use of dopamine agonists to the German health system.A systematic literature search was done. The identified studies have different methodological quality and investigate different hypothesis and different outcome criteria. Therefore a qualitative method of information synthesis was chosen.Since the introduction of L-Dopa in the 1960´s it is considered as the most effective substance to reduce all the cardinal symptoms of Parkinson disease. This substance was improved in the course of time. Firstly some additional substances were given (decarbonxylase inhibitors, catechol-o-transferase inhibitors (COMT-inhibitors), monoaminoxydase-inhibitors (MAO-inhibitors) and NMDA-antagonists (N-Methyl-d-aspartat-antagonists).In the practical therapy of Parkinson dopamine agonists play an important role, because they directly use the dopamine receptors. The monotherapy of Parkinson disease is basically possible and is used in early stages of the disease. Clinical practise has shown, that an add on therapy with dopamine agonists can led to a reduction of the dose of L-dopa and a reduction of following dyskinesia.The studies for effectiveness include studies for the initial therapy, monotherapy and add-on-therapy. Basically there is a good effectiveness of dopamine agonists the reduce dyskinesia and this differences are statistically significant. The effect of dopamine agonists is weaker then levodopa generally. The initial therapy with dopamine agonists can postpone the use of levodopa medication or keep the dose small for a longer period of time. There are more other side effects to levodopa, these are not statistically significant. The idea, which strategy for the treatment should be chosen is dependent of several factors and has to be evaluated with the individual patient. An important criterion is the age of the patient at the beginning of the treatment. For younger patients (under 65 years) the risk of developing motoric fluctuation and dyskinesia is much higher and therefore it is proposed to use levodopa at later stages. The evidence of the evaluated studies show a good effectiveness with the therapy of Parkinson disease as monotherapy of younger patients or as additional medication to levodopa as well as older patients with progressive stages of this disease. In these groups of patients there is a positive cost-benefit ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS health technology assessment\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Doc05\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/2f/HTA-04-05.PMC3011299.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS health technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

帕金森病是一种病因不明的慢性退行性器质性疾病。黑质中黑色素细胞的消失被认为是该疾病的生物人工产物,它导致中脑纹状体中神经元的退行性丧失。这种结构也产生递质多巴胺。由于这种细胞的消失,多巴胺不能产生足够的量,这是身体运动所需要的。本报告的问题涉及多巴胺激动剂治疗的有效性和安全性。此外,成本效益和伦理问题进行了调查。目的是向德国卫生系统推荐使用多巴胺激动剂。进行了系统的文献检索。已确定的研究具有不同的方法学质量,研究不同的假设和不同的结果标准。因此,本文选择了定性的信息综合方法。自20世纪60年代引入左旋多巴以来,它被认为是减少帕金森病所有主要症状的最有效物质。随着时间的推移,这种物质得到了改进。首先给予一些附加物质(脱碳酶抑制剂,儿茶酚-o-转移酶抑制剂(comt -抑制剂),单氨基氧化酶抑制剂(mao -抑制剂)和nmda拮抗剂(n -甲基-d-天冬氨酸拮抗剂)。在帕金森的实际治疗中,多巴胺激动剂发挥着重要的作用,因为它们直接使用多巴胺受体。帕金森病的单一疗法基本上是可能的,并且用于疾病的早期阶段。临床实践表明,增加多巴胺激动剂的治疗可以减少左旋多巴的剂量,并减少随后的运动障碍。有效性研究包括初始治疗、单一治疗和附加治疗的研究。基本上,多巴胺激动剂在减少运动障碍方面有很好的效果,这种差异在统计上是显著的。多巴胺激动剂的作用一般弱于左旋多巴。最初使用多巴胺激动剂治疗可以推迟左旋多巴药物的使用或在较长时间内保持小剂量。左旋多巴还有其他副作用,这些没有统计学意义。应该选择哪种治疗策略的想法取决于几个因素,并且必须与个体患者一起评估。一个重要的标准是患者开始治疗时的年龄。对于年轻患者(65岁以下),发生运动波动和运动障碍的风险要高得多,因此建议在后期使用左旋多巴。评估研究的证据表明,作为年轻患者的单药治疗或作为左旋多巴的附加药物治疗帕金森病,以及患有该疾病进展阶段的老年患者,具有良好的效果。在这些患者群体中,有一个正的成本效益比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The treatment of Parkinson's disease with dopamine agonists.

Parkinson's disease is a chronic degenerative organic disease with unknown causes. A disappearance of cells with melanin in the substantia nigra is considered as biological artefact of the disease, which causes a degenerative loss of neurons in the corpus striatum of mesencephalon. This structure produces also the transmitter substance dopamine. Due to this disappearance of cells dopamine is not produced in a sufficient quantity which is needed for movement of the body.The questions of this report are concerned the efficiency and safety of a treatment with dopamine agonists. Furthermore the cost-effectiveness is investigated as well as ethic questions. The goal is to give recommendation for the use of dopamine agonists to the German health system.A systematic literature search was done. The identified studies have different methodological quality and investigate different hypothesis and different outcome criteria. Therefore a qualitative method of information synthesis was chosen.Since the introduction of L-Dopa in the 1960´s it is considered as the most effective substance to reduce all the cardinal symptoms of Parkinson disease. This substance was improved in the course of time. Firstly some additional substances were given (decarbonxylase inhibitors, catechol-o-transferase inhibitors (COMT-inhibitors), monoaminoxydase-inhibitors (MAO-inhibitors) and NMDA-antagonists (N-Methyl-d-aspartat-antagonists).In the practical therapy of Parkinson dopamine agonists play an important role, because they directly use the dopamine receptors. The monotherapy of Parkinson disease is basically possible and is used in early stages of the disease. Clinical practise has shown, that an add on therapy with dopamine agonists can led to a reduction of the dose of L-dopa and a reduction of following dyskinesia.The studies for effectiveness include studies for the initial therapy, monotherapy and add-on-therapy. Basically there is a good effectiveness of dopamine agonists the reduce dyskinesia and this differences are statistically significant. The effect of dopamine agonists is weaker then levodopa generally. The initial therapy with dopamine agonists can postpone the use of levodopa medication or keep the dose small for a longer period of time. There are more other side effects to levodopa, these are not statistically significant. The idea, which strategy for the treatment should be chosen is dependent of several factors and has to be evaluated with the individual patient. An important criterion is the age of the patient at the beginning of the treatment. For younger patients (under 65 years) the risk of developing motoric fluctuation and dyskinesia is much higher and therefore it is proposed to use levodopa at later stages. The evidence of the evaluated studies show a good effectiveness with the therapy of Parkinson disease as monotherapy of younger patients or as additional medication to levodopa as well as older patients with progressive stages of this disease. In these groups of patients there is a positive cost-benefit ratio.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variability in the prescription of drugs with uncertain effectiveness. The case of SYSADOA in the Basque Country. Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments. Effects of continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapies among adult patients with acute kidney injury. Telemedicine: The legal framework (or the lack of it) in Europe. Complex health care interventions: Characteristics relevant for ethical analysis in health technology assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1